Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:54:58.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - System disturbances as springboard for development of operators' expertise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Leena Norros
Affiliation:
State Technical Research Centre
Yrjo Engeström
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
David Middleton
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Our research studies transitions that occur when new technologies are implemented in industrial work processes. We are particularly interested in analyzing the developmental dynamics of production processes, and are concerned with examining the production process as a “sociotechnical system.”

The effect of technology can be seen to be mediated by social activity in two senses. First, any technology is itself socially constructed and therefore only one alternative of several possible ones. Second, the technology takes its concrete shape through use and is therefore influenced by the choices of the users. In this chapter we especially concentrate on the latter aspect of the social mediation of technology; i.e., we examine the role of operators in constructing the sociotechnical system through the use of technology as a tool of activity.

The dynamics of change in sociotechnical systems

Due to the principal difficulty, even impossibility, of anticipating precisely the functional and economic constraints of a system in its future operation, which is also reflected in internal difficulties in organizing the design process, a system in design deviates from one in operation. The more complex the system is, and the more flexibly it is expected to function in future use, the more difficult it is to predict and specify during design.

As a consequence, there exists a need to develop the design activity (Rouse & Cody 1988; Martin et al., 1990). As the design process has become an object of research, the inadequacy of different formal design models to comprehend the actual design activity has become apparent (Rouse & Cody, 1988; Hyötyläinen et al. 1990).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×