Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T19:58:37.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vitamin D status in pregnant Indian women across trimesters and different seasons and its correlation with neonatal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2011

R. K. Marwaha*
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology and Thyroid Research, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS), Brig. SK Mazumdar Marg, Timarpur, Delhi110 054, India
N. Tandon
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
S. Chopra
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Armed Forces Clinic, New Delhi, India
N. Agarwal
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Institute of Home Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
M. K. Garg
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology, Army Hospital (Research and Referral), Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India
B. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Institute of Home Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
R. S. Kanwar
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology and Thyroid Research, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS), Brig. SK Mazumdar Marg, Timarpur, Delhi110 054, India
K. Bhadra
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology and Thyroid Research, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS), Brig. SK Mazumdar Marg, Timarpur, Delhi110 054, India
S. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology and Thyroid Research, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS), Brig. SK Mazumdar Marg, Timarpur, Delhi110 054, India
K. Mani
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
S. Puri
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Institute of Home Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
*
*Corresponding author: Dr R. K. Marwaha, fax +91 11 23939684, email marwaha_ramank@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the vitamin D status of pregnant Indian women and their breast-fed infants. Subjects were recruited from the Department of Obstetrics, Armed Forces Clinic and Army Hospital (Research and Referral), Delhi. A total of 541 apparently healthy women with uncomplicated, single, intra-uterine gestation reporting in any trimester were consecutively recruited. Of these 541 women, 299 (first trimester, ninety-seven; second trimester, 125; third trimester, seventy-seven) were recruited in summer (April–October) and 242 (first trimester, fifty-nine, second trimester, ninety-three; third trimester, ninety) were recruited in winter (November–March) to study seasonal variations in vitamin D status. Clinical, dietary, biochemical and hormonal evaluations for the Ca–vitamin D–parathormone axis were performed. A subset of 342 mother–infant pairs was re-evaluated 6 weeks postpartum. Mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) of pregnant women was 23·2 (sd 12·2) nmol/l. Hypovitaminosis D (25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l) was observed in 96·3 % of the subjects. Serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower in winter in the second and third trimesters, while serum intact parathormone (iPTH) and alkaline phosphatase levels were significantly higher in winter in all three trimesters. A significant negative correlation was found between serum 25(OH)D and iPTH in mothers (r − 0·367, P = 0·0001) and infants (r − 0·56, P = 0·0001). A strong positive correlation was observed between 25(OH)D levels of mother–infant pairs (r 0·779, P = 0·0001). A high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was observed in pregnancy, lactation and infancy with no significant inter-trimester differences in serum 25(OH)D levels.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D has been established in all age groups across the world(Reference Mithal, Wahi and Bonjour1). The problem of hypovitaminosis D is likely to worsen during pregnancy because of the active transplacental transport of Ca to the developing fetus. Mother–offspring studies in Western populations have confirmed that optimal vitamin D supply not only influences the course of pregnancy, but is also required for fetal and neonatal Ca homeostasis, bone maturation and mineralisation(Reference Jones, Riley and Dwyer2Reference Walicka and Marcinowska-Suchowierska6). Breast-fed infants born to vitamin D-deficient mothers are at risk for developing vitamin D deficiency and its metabolic sequelae(Reference Pawley and Bishop7Reference Seth, Marwaha and Singla12).

Divergent data on the status of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels in different trimesters of pregnancy are available, with different investigators reporting either a decline(Reference Ardawi, Nasrat and BA'Aqueel13) or an increase(Reference Sanchez, Idrisa and Bobzom14) or absence of change with progression of pregnancy(Reference Reddy, Norman and Willis15, Reference Selly, Brown and DeMaggio16). Furthermore, most studies have evaluated mothers in the third trimester and correlated their serum vitamin D levels with the newborn's cord blood 25(OH)D levels(Reference Brooke, Brown and Cleeve17Reference Bhalala, Desai and Parekh19). In view of the aforementioned facts, we have (1) evaluated maternal 25(OH)D levels in different trimesters, (2) assessed the impact of seasonal variation on serum vitamin D status, and (3) correlated maternal and newborn vitamin D status by concurrent evaluation of serum 25(OH)D levels in mother–infant pairs at 6–8 weeks postpartum.

Methods

Setting

Subjects were recruited between April 2006 and October 2007, from the obstetrics outpatient department of the Armed Forces Clinic and Army Hospital (Research and Referral), Delhi, which is a primary care provider for families of armed forces personnel currently residing in Delhi. The present study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee at Army Hospital (Research and Referral). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects/patients.

Subjects

Healthy women (n 541) with uncomplicated, single, intra-uterine gestation in any trimester were consecutively recruited, and anthropometric, nutritional, biochemical and hormonal investigations were carried out once at the time of first contact. All women who were approached agreed to participate in the study. These women, all of whom were housewives, belonged to lower–middle socio-economic strata, with 85 % having completed 12 years of schooling. Fasting blood samples were drawn without venostasis under basal conditions. Serum was separated in a cold centrifuge, and three aliquots were made, one of which was used immediately to measure ionised and total Ca, inorganic P and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), while the other two were stored at − 80°C for assessing 25(OH)D and intact parathormone (iPTH). Women with any chronic hepatic or renal illness, malabsorption syndrome, medications (current and past) and vitamin supplements that can affect the Ca–vitamin D–parathormone axis were excluded from the study.

All women who completed their pregnancy were invited 6–8 weeks postpartum for clinical and biochemical evaluation of mother–infant pairs. Of the 541 recruited pregnant women, only 342 mother–infant pairs could be studied. The remaining mothers were unavailable for comment, as they had gone back to their native villages after delivery, which is a common local tradition.

Hormonal assays

Serum 25(OH)D was measured by RIA using a commercial kit (Diasorin, Stillwater, MN, USA). The normal range for 25(OH)D was 22·5–92·5 nmol/l (9–37 ng/ml), with analytical sensitivity being 3·75 nmol/l (1·5 ng/ml). Serum iPTH was measured by immunoradiometric assay with a commercial kit (Diasorin). The normal range for iPTH was 13–54 pg/ml, with analytical sensitivity being 0·7 pg/ml. Commercial kits (Roche Diagnostics GmBH, Mannheim, Germany) were used to measure serum Ca, P and ALP. Total Ca was estimated by the colorimetric method. The normal range for total Ca was 2·24–2·74 mmol/l (90–110 mg/l) in infants (2 d–2 years old) and 2·09–2·54 mmol/l (84–102 mg/l) in adults, with analytical sensitivity being 2 mg/l. Serum P and ALP were determined by photometric analysis. The normal range for P was 0·97–2·25 mmol/l (30–70 mg/l) in infants and 0·87–1·45 mmol/l (27–45 mg/l) in adults, with analytical sensitivity being 3 mg/l. The normal upper limit of ALP was 1076 IU/l in infants and ≤ 240 IU/l in non-pregnant women. The analytical sensitivity of ALP was 5 IU/l. Serum ionised Ca was estimated by the ion exchange method and its normal range was 1·12–1·32 mmol/l (44·8–5·280 mg/l) in adults and 1–1·25 mmol/l (40–50 mg/l) in infants. Vitamin D deficiency was classified using Lips criteria(Reference Lips20) based on 25(OH)D levels as mild (25–50 nmol/l (10–20 ng/ml)), moderate (12·5–25 nmol/l (5–10 ng/ml)) and severe ( < 12·5 nmol/l (5 ng/ml)) hypovitaminosis D.

Dietary analysis

Nutrient intake was calculated using the 24 h dietary recall method. During pre-testing, three separate 24 h dietary recalls were recorded from fifty subjects (two on weekdays and one on a weekend). Since no difference was found between weekday and weekend intakes, only one 24 h dietary recall was taken during the final study. Detailed descriptions of foods consumed along with their quantities, as estimated by standardised household measures, were noted. Raw weights were then calculated and used to estimate nutrient intake using the Nutritive Value of Indian foods (National Institute of Nutrition, 2001)(Reference Gopalan, Ramasastry and Balasubramaniam21).

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using STATA-9.0 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Descriptive statistics are expressed as numbers (percentages) or means and standard deviations/medians (ranges) as appropriate. Seasonal differences in biochemical parameters were tested using Student's t test and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for non-normal data. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the strength of the relationship between variables, since data were non-normal. P < 0·05 was considered significant.

Results

The basic characteristics of women are given in Table 1. The mean age of pregnant women was 24·6 (sd 2·8) (range 19–30) years. The mean age at marriage was 20·3 (sd 1·5) years. There were 219 (40·5 %) women with their first pregnancy.

Table 1 Basic parameters of pregnant women

(Mean values, standard deviations, medians, ranges, number of subjects and percentages, n 541)

Vitamin D status of pregnant women

A total of 521 women (96·3 %) were found to be vitamin D deficient (25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l), with 36·8, 41·8 and 17·7 % falling into the mild (25–50 nmol/l), moderate (12·5–25 nmol/l) and severe ( < 12·5 nmol/l) hypovitaminosis D categories, respectively. Mean serum total Ca, ionised Ca, P, alkaline phosphate, 25(OH)D and iPTH were 2·33 (sd 0·09) mmol/l, 1·19 (sd 0·05) mmol/l, 1·22 (sd 0·15) mmol/l, 182·07 (sd 40·51) IU/l, 23·2 (sd 12·2) nmol/l and 649 (sd 44) pg/l, respectively. A highly significant negative correlation was observed between vitamin D and iPTH (r − 0·317, P = 0·001) and between vitamin D and ALP (r − 0·232, P = 0·0001). Seasonal differences observed in various biochemical and hormonal parameters during the three trimesters are shown in Table 2. In comparison with the values reported in summer, serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower in winter in the second and third trimesters, while iPTH and ALP levels were significantly higher in winter in all the three trimesters.

Table 2 Seasonal differences between biochemical parameters in the three trimesters of pregnancy

(Mean values, standard deviations, medians, ranges and number of subjects)

ALP, alkaline phosphatase; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; iPTH, intact parathormone.

* Mean values were significantly different as tested by the independent t test between summer and winter: P < 0·001, P < 0·01, P < 0·05.

Mean values were not significantly different between trimesters: P = 0·81 (first v. second trimester), P = 0·12 (second v. third trimester), P = 0·07 (first v. third trimester).

Mean values were significantly different as tested by Wilcoxon's rank-sum test between summer and winter: P < 0·001 (first trimester), P < 0·01 (second trimester), P < 0·05 (third trimester).

Among the women studied either in summer or winter, while there was no significant difference in mean serum 25(OH)D levels between the three trimesters, iPTH levels were significantly higher in the first trimester compared with values in both the second and third trimesters. The prevalence of maternal hypovitaminosis D was not different in the three trimesters whether studied in summer (96·9 v. 92 v. 98·7 %) or winter (100 v. 97·9 v. 95·6 %) in the first, second and third trimesters, respectively. No significant difference was observed in mean serum phosphate levels in the three different trimesters both in summer and winter. Mean serum ALP showed a progressive decline in summer, whereas in winter, it decreased in the second trimester and then increased in the third trimester, the difference being non-significant in both seasons.

There was no difference in serum Ca, phosphate, ALP and 25(OH)D levels between primigravida and multigravida. However, serum iPTH levels were marginally higher in primigravida (69·57 (sd 43·95) pg/ml) compared with those in multigravida (61·72 (sd 43·94) pg/ml; P = 0·023).

Diet

The dietary intake of energy (5300 (sd 1130) kJ), total Ca (408 (sd 160) mg; range 38–1024 mg) and Ca from dairy sources (271 (sd 154) mg) in pregnant women was significantly lower when compared with the RDA for Indians(22). The mean vitamin D intake was similar in all trimesters (0·2 (sd 0·4) μg, P = 0·16), being higher in winter than in summer, but did not reach statistical significance (0·3 (sd 0·4) v. 0·1 (sd 0·3) μg), P = 0·06). Although mean energy intake increased from 5154 (sd 1087) kJ in the first trimester to 5314 (sd 1132) kJ in the second trimester and to 5450 (sd 1185) kJ in the third trimester, these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0·06). Percentage energy contribution was highest from carbohydrates (181 (sd 49) g; 64 %) followed by fat (45 (sd 10) g; 32 %) and protein (35 (sd 12) g; 11 %), which were well in the recommended range.

Vitamin D status of lactating mothers

The biochemical profile of lactating mothers is presented in Table 3. A total of 341 (99·7 %) lactating mothers had serum 25(OH)D levels < 50 nmol/l, with 19·3, 51·2 and 29·2 % suffering from mild (25–50 nmol/l), moderate (12·5–25 nmol/l) and severe ( < 12·5 nmol/l) hypovitaminosis D, respectively. A highly significant negative correlation was found between 25(OH)D and iPTH (r − 0·310, P = 0·0001) and between 25(OH)D and ALP (r − 0·217, P = 0·0001), respectively, in lactating mothers.

Table 3 Biochemical profile of mothers and their infants at 6 weeks postpartum

(Mean values, standard deviations, medians and ranges, n 342)

ALP, alkaline phosphatase; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; iPTH, intact parathormone.

Vitamin D status of exclusively breast-fed infants

The biochemical profile of infants is shown in Table 3. No significant difference was observed in serum 25(OH)D levels in infants born in summer and winter (data not shown). A total of 338 infants (98·8 %) had serum 25(OH)D levels < 50 nmol/l, with 38·0, 44·5 and 16·3 % classified as mild (25–50 nmol/l), moderate (12·5–25 nmol/l) and severe ( < 12·5 nmol/l) hypovitaminosis D, respectively. A highly significant negative correlation was also observed between 25(OH)D and iPTH levels of infants (r − 0·56, P = 0·0001; data not shown).

Correlations between the vitamin D status of mother–infant pairs

As shown in Fig. 1, a strong positive correlation was found between 25(OH)D, (r 0·779, P = 0·0001), ionised Ca (r 0·166, P = 0·0001) and iPTH (r 0·534, P = 0·0001) levels of mothers and infants.

Fig. 1 Relationship between the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels of mother–infant pairs, (r 0·779, P = 0·0001).

Discussion

We have reported vitamin D status of pregnant women hailing from lower–middle socio-economic strata. The nutritional, educational and obstetric data of these women were consistent with that described for this socio-economic class(Reference Sachar, Kaur Navjeet and Soni23), thereby making the information generated generalisable for this group. In the present study, 96 % of pregnant women had hypovitaminosis D, which is the highest reported prevalence in the literature. Several other studies from developing and developed nations across the world have reported that the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D (25(OH)D < 25 nmol/l) in pregnancy ranged from 18 to 84 %(Reference Bassir, Laborie and Lapillonne24Reference Scroth, Lavelle and Moffatt26, Reference Javaid, Crozier and Harvey10, Reference Judkins and Eagleton27Reference Sahu, Bhatia and Aggarwal32). South Asians, both in their country of origin and after migration to Europe or the UK, have been found to have lower serum 25(OH)D concentrations than white Caucasians(Reference Scroth, Lavelle and Moffatt26, Reference Awumey, Mitra and Hollis33Reference Hamson, Goh and Sheldon35) due to a range of factors including skin pigmentation, covered-up clothing (especially common in women), restricted outdoor physical activity and low dietary vitamin D intake(Reference Sachan, Gupta and Das25, Reference Masood and Iqbal36).

The present findings have shown the status of 25(OH)D, Ca, ALP and iPTH during different trimesters of pregnancy. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of 25(OH)D deficiency (25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l)) among pregnant women in the three different trimesters, both in summer and winter. A study of pregnant Iranian women has shown that 60 % of the women in the first trimester, 48 % in the second trimester and 47 % in the third trimester had either severe or moderate vitamin D deficiency(Reference Ainy, Ghazi and Azizi37). In an earlier study conducted in Asian women residing in London, it has been found that 25(OH)D concentration was < 25 nmol/l in 25 % of subjects in the first trimester, which reduced in the third trimester(Reference Brooke, Brown and Cleeve17).

Total serum Ca and ionised Ca values showed no variation across trimesters in the present study. Studies in the literature have shown either no change in serum Ca values(Reference Reddy, Norman and Willis15, Reference Selly, Brown and DeMaggio16, Reference Ainy, Ghazi and Azizi37) or an increase(Reference Brooke, Brown and Cleeve17, Reference Brooke, Brown and Bone38Reference Brunvand, Quigstad and Urdal40) or a decrease(Reference Polanska, Dale and Wills41, Reference Henriksen, Brunvand and Stoltenberg42) with progression of pregnancy. The constancy of serum ionised Ca values has also been reported by other investigators(Reference Reddy, Norman and Willis15, Reference Pitkin43, Reference Saggese, Baroncelli and Bertelloni44). Similar to earlier reports(Reference Reddy, Norman and Willis15, Reference Ainy, Ghazi and Azizi37, Reference Pitkin43, Reference Saggese, Baroncelli and Bertelloni44), there was no change in serum P during the course of pregnancy both in summer and winter. Mean serum ALP showed a non-significant decline in the present study. This is in contrast with the findings of Ainy et al. (Reference Ainy, Ghazi and Azizi37) who attributed the increment in ALP, related to placental production, to lack of vitamin D supplementation and insufficient dietary intake. We observed no significant difference in mean serum 25(OH)D concentration in the three trimesters, both in summer and winter, which is in concordance with the reports from Reddy et al. (Reference Reddy, Norman and Willis15) and Selly et al. (Reference Selly, Brown and DeMaggio16). In contrast, Sanchez et al. (Reference Sanchez, Idrisa and Bobzom14) found that 25(OH)D concentration increased in the second and third trimesters, the increase being attributable to food and supplement intake and sun exposure. In a longitudinal study of pregnant women, Ardawi et al. (Reference Ardawi, Nasrat and BA'Aqueel13) showed a moderate, but statistically significant, decrease towards the end of pregnancy and at term. The decrease was attributed to the particular dietary and cultural habits followed by the subjects. In India, there is no fortification of food products with vitamin D, and there is no clear guidelines recommending mandatory vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. These factors could partly explain the absence of variation in serum 25(OH)D levels during the three trimesters of pregnancy.

Several reasons for change in serum 25(OH)D levels in pregnancy have been postulated. These include altered hepatic 25-hydroxylase activity, change in iPTH levels and increased fetal metabolic activity(Reference Sanchez, Idrisa and Bobzom14, Reference Pitkin43, Reference Cushard, Creditor and Canterburry45Reference Marya, Rathee and Lata47). Another study has suggested that rise in iPTH was responsible for the increased absorption of vitamin D in mothers(Reference Bruinse and Van den Berg48).

There is no consistent pattern in the change in serum iPTH levels during the different trimesters of pregnancy. Most studies conducted in populations replete with Ca and vitamin D have reported a gradual decline in serum iPTH levels with evolution of pregnancy. In contrast, studies from the Gambia, Asia and other regions with low Ca and vitamin D intake often do not report any decline in iPTH levels during pregnancy(Reference Kovacs and Kronenberg49, Reference Kovacs50). Other causes of varying results could include methodological differences in assays resulting in the measurement of multiple different immunoactive but biologically inactive fragments of parathormone(Reference Kovacs and Kronenberg49). In addition, the contribution of placenta-derived parathormone-related peptide to the different aspects of bone mineral metabolism, including renal 1α hydroxylation of 25(OH)D, may also be partly responsible for the variation in iPTH values in the three trimesters reported in different studies(Reference Kovacs and Kronenberg49, Reference Gallacher, Fraser and Owens51Reference Tobias and Cooper53).

Marked seasonal variation in serum 25(OH)D levels was observed in the present study. A progressive fall in 25(OH)D levels in pregnant women during winter months due to the reduced availability of sunshine has been described in European and US populations(Reference MacLaughlin, Fairney and Lester54Reference Van der Wielen, Lowik and Van den Berg57), as well as from India and other Asian countries(Reference Sahu, Bhatia and Aggarwal32, Reference Goswami, Gupta and Goswami34, Reference Ainy, Ghazi and Azizi37, Reference Kim and Moon58, Reference Nakamura, Nashimoto and Yamamoto59). In addition, serum 25(OH)D concentration also depends on the extent of the body surface area exposed, which is likely to be reduced due to the style of dressing in winter(Reference Hatun, Ozkan and Orbak8, Reference Puri, Marwaha and Agarwal60).

High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in apparently healthy lactating mothers (99·7 %) and exclusively breast-fed infants (98·8 %) observed in the present study only reiterates our earlier observation(Reference Seth, Marwaha and Singla12) as well as those of other workers(Reference Ainy, Ghazi and Azizi37, Reference Puri, Marwaha and Agarwal60Reference Dawodu and Wagner63). Mothers with suboptimal vitamin D status have offspring with reduced intra-uterine and postnatal skeletal development(Reference Pawley and Bishop7, Reference Javaid, Crozier and Harvey10). The impact of maternal vitamin D status on the neonate's serum 25(OH)D levels is apparent from the strong correlation reported by us in the present study. Although a similar correlation between 25(OH)D levels of mothers and newborns has been reported earlier, most investigators have measured cord blood 25(OH)D levels to establish the relationship(Reference Marya, Rathee and Dua18, Reference Bhalala, Desai and Parekh19, Reference Farrant, Krishnaveni and Hill31).

Mother–offspring studies in Western populations have shown associations of maternal body build, diet, nutritional status, smoking and physical activity with bone mass in newborns and children(Reference Jones, Riley and Dwyer2Reference Godfrey, Walker-Bone and Robinson4, Reference Tobias, Steer and Emmett5, Reference Pawley and Bishop7, Reference Javaid, Crozier and Harvey10). The importance of nutrition, mainly Ca, has been acknowledged with regard to pregnancy outcome(Reference Balasubramanian, Rajeshwari and Gulab64). Greater maternal consumption of Ca and Ca-rich foods, especially milk and milk products, in mid- to late pregnancy has been associated with improved bone outcomes in children(Reference Ganpule, Yajnik and Fall9). In the present study, mothers had low Ca intakes, consistent with other low-income groups in India(Reference Shatruguna, Kulkarni and Kumar65). The mean dietary Ca intake (408·11 (sd 167·2) mg/d) of mothers was just 60 % of the RDA given by the Indian Council of Medical Research(22), and the intake of other macronutrients was also far below the RDA. Also, vitamin D supplementation is not a part of antenatal care programmes in India, which worsens the situation further.

These data reinforce the need to provide greater emphasis on maternal nutrition to improve neonatal and childhood bone health.

Conclusion

We conclude that there is a high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among pregnant women and their infants in India. Serum 25(OH)D levels were uniformly low across all three trimesters, with a tendency to decline in winter. There was a strong positive correlation between maternal and infant serum 25(OH)D levels. Further research, preferably by randomised controlled trials, is needed to establish the effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the bone health of women and their children.

Acknowledgements

The present study was funded through project no. INM305, from the Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India. The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance provided by Madan Prasad, MI Beg, Abhishek Kaushik, Amit Panwar, Pramod Kumar and Neeta Rautela for the conduct of the present study. We would also like to express our gratitude to the study volunteers and staff of the Armed Forces Clinic, Dalhousie Road, New Delhi. None of the authors has a conflict of interests to declare. The authors' contributions were as follows: R. K. M. and N. T. contributed to the conceptualisation of the study, clinical evaluation and preparation of the manuscript. S. C. supervised the recruitment and clinical evaluation of the subjects. N. A. was involved in the data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. M. K. G. was responsible for conceptualising the study and clinical evaluation of the subjects. B. S. contributed to conceptualisation of the study and data collection. R. S. K. assisted in the clinical evaluation. K. B. and S. S. performed the collection of biochemical samples and laboratory evaluation. K. M. analysed the data. S. P. conducted the data collection and dietary analysis. The study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Army Hospital (Research and Referral), Delhi Cantt, India.

References

1 Mithal, A, Wahi, DA, Bonjour, JP, et al. (2009) Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporos Int 20, 18071829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Jones, G, Riley, M & Dwyer, T (1999) Maternal smoking during pregnancy, growth and bone mass in prepubertal children. J Bone Miner Res 14, 146151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Jones, G, Riley, MD & Dwyer, T (2000) Maternal diet during pregnancy is associated with bone mineral density in children: a longitudinal study. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 749756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Godfrey, K, Walker-Bone, K, Robinson, S, et al. (2001) Neonatal bone mass: influence of parental birthweight and maternal smoking, body composition and activity during pregnancy. J Bone Miner Res 16, 16941703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Tobias, JH, Steer, CD, Emmett, PM, et al. (2005) Bone mass in childhood is related to maternal diet in pregnancy. Osteoporos Int 16, 17311741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Walicka, M & Marcinowska-Suchowierska, E (2008) Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy and lactation. Ginekol Pol 79, 780784.Google ScholarPubMed
7 Pawley, N & Bishop, NJ (2004) Prenatal and infant predictors of bone health: the influence of vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr 80, Suppl., S1748S1751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Hatun, S, Ozkan, B, Orbak, Z, et al. (2005) Vitamin D deficiency in early infancy. J Nutr 135, 279282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Ganpule, A, Yajnik, CS, Fall, CHD, et al. (2006) Bone mass in Indian children – relationships to maternal nutritional status and diet during pregnancy: the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91, 29943001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Javaid, MK, Crozier, SR, Harvey, NC, et al. (2006) Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at age nine years: a longitudinal study. Lancet 367, 3643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Dijkstra, SH, Beek, AV, Janssen, JW, et al. (2007) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in newborn infants of high-risk mothers. Arch Dis Child 92, 750753.Google ScholarPubMed
12 Seth, A, Marwaha, RK, Singla, B, et al. (2009) Vitamin D nutrition status of exclusively breast fed infants and their mothers. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 22, 241246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Ardawi, MSM, Nasrat, HAN & BA'Aqueel, HS (1997) Calcium regulating hormones and parathyroid hormone-related peptide in normal human pregnancy and postpartum: a longitudinal study. Eur J Endocrinol 137, 402409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Sanchez, PA, Idrisa, A, Bobzom, DN, et al. (1997) Calcium and vitamin D status of pregnant teenagers in Maiduguri Nigeria. J Natl Med Assoc 89, 805811.Google ScholarPubMed
15 Reddy, SG, Norman, AW, Willis, DM, et al. (1983) Regulation of vitamin D metabolism in normal human pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56, 363370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Selly, EW, Brown, EM, DeMaggio, DM, et al. (1997) A prospective study of calcitropic hormones in pregnancy and post partum: reciprocal changes in serum intact parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176, 214217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Brooke, OG, Brown, IRF, Cleeve, HJW, et al. (1981) Observations on the vitamin D state of pregnant Asian women in London. Br J Obstet gynaecol 88, 1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Marya, RK, Rathee, S, Dua, V, et al. (1988) Effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on foetal growth. Ind J Med Res 88, 488492.Google ScholarPubMed
19 Bhalala, U, Desai, M, Parekh, P, et al. (2007) Subclinical hypovitaminosis D among exclusively breastfed young infants. Indian Pediatr 44, 897901.Google ScholarPubMed
20 Lips, P (2001) Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly, consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev 22, 477501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Gopalan, C, Ramasastry, BV & Balasubramaniam, SC (2001) Nutritive Value of Indian Foods. Hyderabad: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Publication.Google Scholar
22 Indian Council of Medical Research (1990) Nutrient Requirements and Recommended Dietary Allowances for Indians. New Delhi: ICMR Publication.Google Scholar
23 Sachar, RK, Kaur Navjeet, , Soni, RK, et al. (2000) Energy consumption during pregnancy and its relationship to birth weight. A population based study from rural Punjab. Indian J Commun Med 25, 166169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Bassir, M, Laborie, S, Lapillonne, A, et al. (2001) Vitamin D deficiency in Iranian mothers and their neonates: a pilot study. Acta Paediatr 90, 577579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Sachan, A, Gupta, R, Das, V, et al. (2005) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women and their newborns in northern India. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 10601064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Scroth, RJ, Lavelle, CLB & Moffatt, MEK (2005) A review of vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy: who is affected? Int J Circumpolar Health 64, 112120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Judkins, A & Eagleton, C (2006) Vitamin D deficiency in pregnant New Zealand women. N Z Med J 119, U2144.Google ScholarPubMed
28 Van der Meer, IM, Karamali, NS, Boeke, JP, et al. (2006) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant non-western women in The Hague, Netherlands. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 350353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Cavalier, E, Delanaye, P, Morreale, A, et al. (2008) Vitamin D deficiency in recently pregnant women. Rev Med Liege 63, 8791.Google ScholarPubMed
30 O'Riordan, MN, Kiely, M, Higgins, JR, et al. (2008) Prevalence of suboptimal vitamin D status during pregnancy. Ir Med J 101, 240243.Google ScholarPubMed
31 Farrant, HJW, Krishnaveni, GV, Hill, JC, et al. (2009) Vitamin D insufficiency is common in Indian mothers but is not associated with gestational diabetes or variation in newborn size. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 646652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Sahu, M, Bhatia, V, Aggarwal, A, et al. (2009) Vitamin D replacement in pregnant women in rural north India: a pilot study vitamin D replacement in pregnant Indian women. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 11571159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Awumey, EMK, Mitra, DA, Hollis, BW, et al. (1998) Vitamin D metabolism is altered in Asian Indians in the Southern United States: a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83, 169173.Google ScholarPubMed
34 Goswami, R, Gupta, N, Goswami, D, et al. (2000) Prevalence and significance of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in healthy subjects in Delhi. Am J Clin Nutr 72, 472475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35 Hamson, C, Goh, L, Sheldon, P, et al. (2003) Comparitive study of bone mineral density, calcium, and vitamin D status in the Gujarati and white populations of Leicester. Postgrad Med J 79, 279283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Masood, SH & Iqbal, MP (2008) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in South Asia. Pak J Med Sci 24, 891897.Google Scholar
37 Ainy, E, Ghazi, AAM & Azizi, F (2006) Changes in calcium, 25(OH) vitamin D3 and other biochemical factors during pregnancy. J Endocrinol Invest 29, 303307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Brooke, OG, Brown, IRF, Bone, CDM, et al. (1980) Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: effects on calcium status and fetal growth. Br Med J 80, 751754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Kohlmeier, L & Marcus, R (1995) Calium disorders of pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 24, 1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Brunvand, L, Quigstad, E, Urdal, P, et al. (1996) Vitamin D deficiency and fetal growth. Early Hum Dev 45, 2733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41 Polanska, N, Dale, RA & Wills, MR (1976) Plasma calcium levels in pregnant Asian women. Ann Clin Biochem 13, 339344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Henriksen, C, Brunvand, L, Stoltenberg, C, et al. (1995) Diet and vitamin D status among pregnant Pakistani women in Oslo. Eur J Clin Nutr 49, 211218.Google ScholarPubMed
43 Pitkin, RM (1985) Calcium metabolisms in pregnancy and the perinatal period: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151, 99109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44 Saggese, G, Baroncelli, GI, Bertelloni, S, et al. (1991) Intact parathyroid ghormone levels during pregnancy, in healthy term neaonates and in hypocalcemic preterm infants. Acta Padiatr Scand 80, 3641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45 Cushard, WG, Creditor, M, Canterburry, JM, et al. (1972) Physiologic hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 34, 767771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46 Turton, CWG, Stamp, TCB, Stanley, P, et al. (1977) Altered vitamin D metabolism in pregnancy. Lancet i, 222225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Marya, RK, Rathee, S, Lata, V, et al. (1981) Effects of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 12, 155161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48 Bruinse, HW & Van den Berg, H (1995) Changes of some vitamin levels during and after normal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 61, 3137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49 Kovacs, CS & Kronenberg, HM (1997) Maternal–fetal calcium and bone metabolism during pregnancy, puerperium and lactation. Endocr Rev 18, 832872.Google ScholarPubMed
50 Kovacs, CS (2008) Vitamin D in pregnancy and lactation: maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes from human and animal studies. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 520S528S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51 Gallacher, SJ, Fraser, WD, Owens, OJ, et al. (1994) Changes in calcitropic hormones and biochemical markers of bone turnover in normal human pregnancy. Eur J Endocrinol 131, 369374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52 Hosking, DJ (1996) Calcium homeostasis in pregnancy. Clin Endocrinol 45, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53 Tobias, JH & Cooper, C (2004) PTH/PTHrp activity and the programming of skeletal development in utero. J Bone Miner Res 19, 177182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54 MacLaughlin, M, Fairney, A, Lester, E, et al. (1974) Seasonal variations in serum 25-hydroxy-cholecalciferol in healthy people. Lancet i, 536538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Kuoppala, T, Tuimala, R, Parviainen, M, et al. (1986) Serum levels of vitamin D metabolites, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and alkaline phosphotase in Finnish women throughout pregnancy and in cord serum at delivery. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 40, 287293.Google Scholar
56 Sherman, SS, Hollis, BW & Tobin, JD (1990) Vitamin D status and related parameters in a healthy population: the effects of age, sex, and season. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71, 405413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 Van der Wielen, RP, Lowik, MR, Van den Berg, H, et al. (1995) Serum vitamin D concentrations among elderly people in Europe. Lancet 345, 207210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58 Kim, JH & Moon, SJ (2000) Time spent outdoors and seasonal variation in serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in Korean women. Int J Food Sci Nutr 51, 439451.Google ScholarPubMed
59 Nakamura, K, Nashimoto, M & Yamamoto, M (2000) Summer/winter differences in the serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D3 and parathyroid hormone levels of Japanese women. Int J Biometeorol 44, 186189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60 Puri, S, Marwaha, RK, Agarwal, N, et al. (2008) Vitamin D status of apparently healthy schoolgirls from two different socioeconomic strata in Delhi: relation to nutrition and lifestyle. Br J Nutr 99, 876882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61 MacLennan, WJ, Hamilton, JC & Darmady, JM (1980) The effect of season and stage of pregnancy on plasma 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations in pregnant women. Postgrad Med J 56, 7579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62 Dawodu, A, Agarwal, M, Hossain, M, et al. (2003) Hypovitaminosis D and vitamin D deficiency in exclusively breast-feeding infants and their mothers in summer: a justification for vitamin D supplementation of breast-feeding infants. J Pediatr 142, 169173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63 Dawodu, A & Wagner, CL (2007) Mother–child vitamin D deficiency: an international perspective. Arch Dis Child 92, 737740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64 Balasubramanian, K, Rajeshwari, J & Gulab, (2003) Varying role of vitamin D deficiency in the etiology of rickets in young children vs. adolescents in northern India. J Trop Pediatr 49, 201206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65 Shatruguna, V, Kulkarni, B, Kumar, PA, et al. (2005) Bone status of Indian women from a low-income group and its relationship to nutritional status. Osteoporos Int 16, 18271835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Basic parameters of pregnant women(Mean values, standard deviations, medians, ranges, number of subjects and percentages, n 541)

Figure 1

Table 2 Seasonal differences between biochemical parameters in the three trimesters of pregnancy(Mean values, standard deviations, medians, ranges and number of subjects)

Figure 2

Table 3 Biochemical profile of mothers and their infants at 6 weeks postpartum(Mean values, standard deviations, medians and ranges, n 342)

Figure 3

Fig. 1 Relationship between the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels of mother–infant pairs, (r 0·779, P = 0·0001).