Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:41:44.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gas migration experiments in bentonite: implications for numerical modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

C. C. Graham*
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
J. F. Harrington
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
R. J. Cuss
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
P. Sellin
Affiliation:
SKB, Stockholm, Sweden
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the Swedish KBS-3 repository concept, there is potential for gas to be generated from corrosion of ferrous materials under anoxic conditions, combined with the radioactive decay of the waste and radiolysis of water. A full understanding of the probable behaviour of this gas phase within the engineered barrier system (EBS) is therefore required for performance assessment. We demonstrate key features from gas transport experiments on pre-compacted Mx80 bentonite, under laboratory and field conditions, and discuss their implications in terms of a conceptual model for gas migration behaviour. On both scales, major gas entry is seen to occur close to the sum of the porewater and swelling pressures of the bentonite. In addition, gas pressure at breakthrough is profoundly sensitive to the number and location of available sinks for gas escape. Observations of breakthrough can be explained by the creation of dilatational pathways, resulting in localized changes in the monitored porewater pressures and total stresses. These pathways are highly unstable, evolving spatially and temporally, and must consequently influence the gas permeability as their distribution/geometry develops.

Such observations are poorly embodied by conventional concepts of two-phase flow, which do not fully represent the key processes involved. Although dilatancy based models provide a better description of these processes, the paucity of data limits further development and validation of these models at present.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
© [2012] The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2012

References

Angeli, M. Solday, Skurtveit, E. and Aker, E (2009) Experimental percolation of supercritical CO2 through a caprock. Energy Procedia, 1, 33513358.Google Scholar
Arnedo, D., Alonso, E.E., Olivella, S. and Romero, E. (2008) Gas injection tests on sand/bentonite mixtures in the laboratory. Experimental results and numerical modelling. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, S237S247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuss, R.J. and Harrington, J.F. (2011) Update on Dilatancy Associated with Onset of Gas Flow in Callovo-Oxfordian Claystone., Progress report on test SPP_COx-2. British Geological Survey commissioned report CR/11/110, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Cuss, R.J., Harrington, J.F. and Noy, D.J. (2010) Large Scale Gas Injection Test (Lasgit) Performed at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory. Summary Report 2008. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (SKB) Technical Report TR-10-38. SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, 109 pp.Google Scholar
Cuss, R.J., Harrington, J.F., Noy, D.J., Wikman, A., and Sellin, P. (2011) Large scale gas injection test (Lasgit): results from two gas injection tests.. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36, 17291742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohew, A.T., Horseman, S.T. and Harrington, J.F. (2000) Gas entry into unconfined clay pastes between the liquid and plastic limits. Pp. 369–394 in: Environmental Mineralogy – Microbial Interactions, Anthropogeni c Influences , Contaminated Land and Waste Management, (J.D. Cotter-Howells, L.S. Campbell, E. Valsami-Jones and M. Batchelder, editors). Mineralogical Society Special Publication, 9. Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, London..Google Scholar
Gallé, C. (1998) Migration des gaz et pression de rupture dans une argile compactée destinée à la barrière ouvragée d'un stackage profound.. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 169, 675680.Google Scholar
Gallé, C. and Tanai, K. (1998) Evaluation of gas transport properties of back fill materials for waste disposal: H2 migration experiments in compacted Fo-Ca Clay.. Clays and Clay Minerals, 46, 498–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J.F. and Horseman, S.T. (1999) Gas transport properties of clays and mudrocks. Pp. 107–124 in:. Muds and Mudstones: Physical and Fluid Flow Properties (A.C. Aplin, A.J. Fleet and J.H.S. Macquaker, editors). Geological Society of London Special Publication, 158. Geological Society of London, London.Google Scholar
Harrington, J.F. and Horseman, S.T. (2003 Migration in KBS-3 Buffer Bentonite: Sensitivity of Test Parameters to Experimental Boundary Conditions. SKB Technical Report No. TR-03-02. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Harrington, J.F., Birchall, D.J., Noy, D.J. and Cuss, R.J. (2007) Large Scale Gas Injection Test (Lasgit) Performed at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory: Summary Report 2007. British Geological Survey Commissioned Report, CR/07/211.Google Scholar
Harrington, J.F., de la Vaissière, R., Noy, D.J., Cuss, R.J. and Talandier, J. (2012) Gas flow in Callovo- Oxfordian clay (COx): results from laboratory and field-scale measurements.. Mineralogical Magazine, 76, 33033318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horseman, S.T. (1996) Generation and Migration of Repository Gases: Some Key Considerations in Radioactive Waste Disposal. In:. Proc. Int. 2-Day Conference, London, 21–22 Nov. 1996, Proc. Int. 2-Day Conference, London, 21–22 Nov. 1996,Google Scholar
Horseman, S.T. and Harrington, T. (1997) Study of Gas Migration in Mx80 Buffer Bentonite. British Geological Survey, Technical Report WE/97/7. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Horseman, S.T., Harrington, T. and Sellin, P. (1997) Gas migration in Mx80 buffer bentonite.. MRS Symposia Proceedings, 465, 10031010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horseman, S.T., Harrington, T. and Sellin, P. (1999) Gas migration in clay barriers. Engineering Geology, 54, 139149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horseman, S.T., Harrington, T. and Sellin, P. (2004) Water and gas flow in Mx80 bentonite buffer clay.. Materials Research Society, 807, 715720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, P., Horseman, S. and Gimmi, T. (2005) Characterisation of gas transport properties of the Opalinus Clay, a potential host rock formation for radioactive waste disposal.. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue de l'IFP, 60, 121139.Google Scholar
Pusch, R. and Forsberg, T. (2005) Gas Migration through Bentonite Clay. SKB Technical Report 83-71. Svensk Kä rnbrä nslehantering AB, Stockholm, Sweden. Google Scholar
SKB (2011) Long-term Safety for the Final Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel at Forsmark: Main Report of the SR-Site Project. SKB Technical Report TR-11-01. Svensk Kä rnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Skurtveit, E., Aker, E., Soldal, M., Angeli, M. and Hallberg, E. (2010) Influence of Micro Fractures and Fluid Pressure on Sealing Efficiency of Caprock: A Laboratory Study on Shale. GHGT-10. International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Technologies.Google Scholar
Tanai, K., Kanno, T. and Gallé, C. (1997) Experimental study of gas permeabilities and breakthrough pressures in clays.. MRS Symposia Proceedings, 465, 10031010.Google Scholar
Van Geet, M., Volckaert, G., Bastiaens, W., Maes, N., Weetjens, E., Sellin, P., Vallejan, B. and Gens, A. (2007) Efficiency of a borehole seal by means of precompacted bentonite blocks. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 32, 123134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar