Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:14:06.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic diversity and phylogeography of the elusive, but epidemiologically important Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto genotype G3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2018

Liina Kinkar
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia
Teivi Laurimäe
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia
Ibrahim Balkaya
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Atatürk, Erzurum, Turkey
Adriano Casulli
Affiliation:
World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for the Epidemiology, Detection and Control of Cystic and Alveolar Echinococcosis.European Union Reference Laboratory for Parasites. Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
Houria Zait
Affiliation:
Parasitology and Mycology Department, Mustapha University Hospital, 16000 Algiers, Algeria
Malik Irshadullah
Affiliation:
Section of Parasitology, Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
Mitra Sharbatkhori
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
Hossein Mirhendi
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Mohammad Rostami-Nejad
Affiliation:
Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Francisco Ponce-Gordo
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University, Plaza Ramón y Cajal s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Steffen Rehbein
Affiliation:
Merial GmbH, Kathrinenhof Research Center, Walchenseestr. 8–12, 83101 Rohrdorf, Germany
Eshrat Beigom Kia
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Sami Simsek
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Firat, 23119 Elazig, Turkey
Viliam Šnábel
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Hlinkova 3, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
Gérald Umhang
Affiliation:
ANSES, Nancy Laboratory for Rabies and Wildlife, Wildlife surveillance and eco-epidemiology unit, Malzéville 54220, France
Antonio Varcasia
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2 – 07100 Sassari, Italy
Urmas Saarma*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia
*
Author for correspondence: Urmas Saarma, E-mail: urmas.saarma@ut.ee

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a severe parasitic disease caused by the species complex Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. Human infections are most commonly associated with E. granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.), comprising genotypes G1 and G3. The objective of the current study was to provide first insight into the genetic diversity and phylogeography of genotype G3. Despite the epidemiological importance of the genotype, it has remained poorly explored due to the ambiguity in the definition of the genotype. However, it was recently demonstrated that long sequences of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) provide a reliable method to discriminate G1 and G3 from each other. Therefore, we sequenced near-complete mtDNA of 39 G3 samples, covering most of the known distribution range and host spectra of the genotype. The phylogenetic network revealed high genetic variation within E. granulosus s.s. G3 and while G3 is significantly less prevalent worldwide than G1, the genetic diversity of both of the genotypes is equally high. We also present the results of the Bayesian phylogeographic analysis, which yielded several well-supported diffusion routes of genotype G3 originating from Turkey and Iran, suggesting the Middle East as the origin of the genotype.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adwan, G, et al. (2013) Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus isolated from sheep in Palestine. Experimental Parasitology 134, 195199.Google Scholar
Alvarez Rojas, CA, Romig, T and Lightowlers, MW (2014) Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato genotypes infecting humans – review of current knowledge. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 918.Google Scholar
Alvarez Rojas, CA, et al. (2016) Microdiversity of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in Australia. Parasitology 143, 10261033.Google Scholar
Alvarez Rojas, CA, et al. (2017) High intraspecific variability of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in Chile. Parasitology International 66, 112115.Google Scholar
Andresiuk, MV, et al. (2013) Echinococcus granulosus genotype G1 dominated in cattle and sheep during 2003–2006 in Buenos Aires province, an endemic area for cystic echinococcosis in Argentina. Acta Tropica 127, 136142.Google Scholar
Anijalg, P, et al. (2018) Large-scale migrations of brown bears in Eurasia and to North America during the Late Pleistocene. Journal of Biogeography 45, 394405.Google Scholar
Ayres, DL, et al. (2012) BEAGLE: an application programming interface and high-performance computing library for statistical phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 61, 170173.Google Scholar
Bandelt, HJ, Forster, P and Rohl, A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 3748.Google Scholar
Bart, JM, et al. (2006) Genotyping of human cystic echinococcosis in Xinjiang, PR China. Parasitology 133, 571579.Google Scholar
Bielejec, F, et al. (2016) Spread3: interactive visualization of spatiotemporal history and trait evolutionary processes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33, 21672169.Google Scholar
Borghese, A (2005) Buffalo Production and Research. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Bowles, J and McManus, DP (1993) NADH dehydrogenase 1 gene sequences compared for species and strains of the genus Echinococcus. International Journal for Parasitology 23, 969972.Google Scholar
Bowles, J, Blair, D and McManus, DP (1992) Genetic variants within the genus Echinococcus identified by mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 54, 165173.Google Scholar
Bowles, J, Blair, D and McManus, D (1994) Molecular genetic characterization of the cervid strain (‘northern form’) of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology 109, 215221.Google Scholar
Breyer, I, et al. (2004) Echinococcus granulosus strain typing in Bulgaria: the G1 genotype is predominant in intermediate and definitive wild hosts. Parasitology Research 93, 127130.Google Scholar
Bruford, MW, Bradley, DG and Luikart, G (2003) DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nature Reviews. Genetics 4, 900910.Google Scholar
Busi, M, et al. (2007) Genetic variation within and between G1 and G3 genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus in Italy revealed by multilocus DNA sequencing. Veterinary Parasitology 150, 7583.Google Scholar
Calderini, P, Gabrielli, S and Cancrini, G (2012) Is the goat a new host for the G3 Indian buffalo strain of Echinococcus granulosus? The Scientific World Journal 2012, 286357. doi: 10.1100/2012/286357.Google Scholar
Capuano, F, et al. (2006) Cystic echinococcosis in water buffaloes: epidemiological survey and molecular evidence of ovine (G1) and buffalo (G3) strains. Veterinary Parasitology 137, 262268.Google Scholar
Casulli, A, et al. (2012) Genetic variability of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in Europe inferred by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 12, 377383.Google Scholar
Chessa, B, et al. (2009) Revealing the history of sheep domestication using retrovirus integrations. Science 324, 532536.Google Scholar
Davison, J, et al. (2011) Late-Quaternary biogeographic scenarios for the brown bear (Ursus arctos), a wild mammal model species. Quaternary Science Reviews 30, 418430.Google Scholar
Debeljak, Z, et al. (2016) First insights into the genetic diversity of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.) in Serbia. Veterinary Parasitology 223, 5762.Google Scholar
de la Rue, ML, et al. (2011) Infection of humans and animals with Echinococcus granulosus (G1 and G3 strains) and E. ortleppi in Southern Brazil. Veterinary Parasitology 177, 97103.Google Scholar
Deplazes, P, et al. (2017) Global distribution of alveolar and cystic echinococcosis. Advances in Parasitology 95, 315493.Google Scholar
Drummond, AJ and Bouckaert, RR (2015) Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis with BEAST. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Drummond, AJ, et al. (2012) Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29, 19691973.Google Scholar
Eckert, J and Deplazes, P (2004) Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17, 107135.Google Scholar
Eckert, J, et al. (2001) Echinococcosis in animals: clinical aspects, diagnosis and treatment. WHO/OIE Manual on echinococcosis in humans and animals: a public health problem of global concern, Ch. 1 (pp. 1–17) and Ch. 6 (pp. 195225).Google Scholar
Ehsan, M, et al. (2017) Prevalence and genotypic characterization of bovine Echinococcus granulosus isolates by using cytochrome oxidase 1 (Co1) gene in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Veterinary Parasitology 239, 8085.Google Scholar
Espinoza, S, et al. (2014) Detection of the G3 genotype of Echinococcus granulosus from hydatid cysts of Chilean cattle using COX1 and ND1 mitochondrial markers. Parasitology Research 113, 139147.Google Scholar
Excoffier, L, Laval, G and Schneider, S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1, 4750.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization (2014) Multicriteria-based ranking for risk management of food-borne parasites. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series No. 23. Rome, 302, p. XVI.Google Scholar
Fu, YX (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147, 915925.Google Scholar
Griffiths, RC and Tavaré, S (1994) Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 344, 403410.Google Scholar
Guindon, S, et al. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59, 307321.Google Scholar
Hall, TA (1999) Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 9598.Google Scholar
Hassan, ZI, et al. (2017) Two haplotype clusters of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in northern Iraq (Kurdistan region) support the hypothesis of a parasite cradle in the Middle East. Acta Tropica 172, 201207.Google Scholar
Hewitt, GM (1999) Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68, 87112.Google Scholar
Ho, SYW, et al. (2008) The effect of inappropriate calibration: three case studies in molecular ecology. PLoS ONE 3, e1615.Google Scholar
Hofreiter, M and Stewart, J (2009) Ecological change, range fluctuations and population dynamics during the Pleistocene. Current Biology 19, R584R594.Google Scholar
Hüttner, M, et al. (2008) Genetic characterization and phylogenetic position of Echinococcus felidis Ortlepp, 1937 (Cestoda: Taeniidae) from the African lion. International Journal for Parasitology 38, 861868.Google Scholar
Keis, M, et al. (2013) Complete mitochondrial genomes and a novel spatial genetic method reveal cryptic phylogeographic structure and migration patterns among brown bears in north-western Eurasia. Journal of Biogeography 40, 915927.Google Scholar
Kierstein, G, et al. (2004) Analysis of mitochondrial D-loop region casts new light on domestic water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30, 308324.Google Scholar
Kinkar, L, et al. (2016) High-resolution phylogeography of zoonotic tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto genotype G1 with an emphasis on its distribution in Turkey, Italy and Spain. Parasitology 143, 17901801.Google Scholar
Kinkar, L, et al. (2017) New mitogenome and nuclear evidence on the phylogeny and taxonomy of the highly zoonotic tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 52, 5258.Google Scholar
Kinkar, L, et al. (2018) Global phylogeography and genetic diversity of the zoonotic tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto genotype G1. International Journal for Parasitology (in press).Google Scholar
Knapp, J, et al. (2011) Phylogenetic relationships within Echinococcus and Taenia tapeworms (Cestoda: Taeniidae): an inference from nuclear protein-coding genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61, 628638.Google Scholar
Knapp, J, et al. (2015) Taxonomy, phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Echinococcus multilocularis: from fundamental knowledge to health ecology. Veterinary Parasitology 213, 8591.Google Scholar
Korsten, M, et al. (2009) Sudden expansion of a single brown bear maternal lineage across northern continental Eurasia after the last ice age: a general demographic model for mammals? Molecular Ecology 18, 19631979.Google Scholar
Kotlík, P, et al. (2006) A northern glacial refugium for bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 1486014864.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, et al. (2007) Mitochondrial DNA analyses of Indian water buffalo support a distinct genetic origin of river and swamp buffalo. Animal Genetics 38, 227232.Google Scholar
Lanfear, R, et al. (2012) Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29, 16951701.Google Scholar
Lanfear, R, et al. (2016) Partitionfinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34, 772773.Google Scholar
Latif, AA, et al. (2010) Morphological and molecular characterisation of Echinococcus granulosus in livestock and humans in Punjab, Pakistan. Veterinary Parasitology 170, 4449.Google Scholar
Laurimäe, T, et al. (2016) Genetic diversity and phylogeography of highly zoonotic Echinococcus granulosus genotype G1 in the Americas (Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico) based on 8279 bp of mtDNA. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 45, 290296.Google Scholar
Lavikainen, A, et al. (2003) Molecular genetic characterization of the Fennoscandian cervid strain, a new genotypic group (G10) of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology 127, 207215.Google Scholar
Lemey, P, et al. (2009) Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLoS Computational Biology 5, e1000520.Google Scholar
Librado, P and Rozas, J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25, 14511452.Google Scholar
Lv, F-H, et al. (2015) Mitogenomic meta-analysis identifies two phases of migration in the history of eastern Eurasian sheep. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32, 25152533.Google Scholar
Lymbery, AJ, et al. (2015) Echinococcus canadensis, E. borealis, and E. intermedius. What's in a name? Trends in Parasitology 31, 2329.Google Scholar
Maillard, S, et al. (2009) The EmsB tandemly repeated multilocus microsatellite: a new tool to investigate genetic diversity of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 47, 36083616.Google Scholar
McDevitt, AD, et al. (2012) Climate and refugial origin influence the mitochondrial lineage distribution of weasels (Mustela nivalis) in a phylogeographic suture zone. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 106, 5769.Google Scholar
Mitrea, IL, et al. (2014) Occurrence and genetic characterization of Echinococcus granulosus in naturally infected adult sheep and cattle in Romania. Veterinary Parasitology 206, 159166.Google Scholar
Moks, E, et al. (2008) First report of Echinococcus granulosus G8 in Eurasia and a reappraisal of the phylogenetic relationships of ‘genotypes’ G5–G10. Parasitology 135, 647654.Google Scholar
Moro, P and Schantz, PM (2009) Echinococcosis: a review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 13, 125133.Google Scholar
M'rad, S, et al. (2010) Molecular identification of Echinococcus granulosus in Tunisia: first record of the buffalo strain (G3) in human and bovine in the country. The Open Veterinary Science Journal 4, 2730.Google Scholar
Nakao, M, et al. (2010) Genetic polymorphisms of Echinococcus tapeworms in China as determined by mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 379385.Google Scholar
Nakao, M, et al. (2013) Mitochondrial phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus (Cestoda: Taeniidae) with emphasis on relationships among Echinococcus canadensis genotypes. Parasitology 140, 16251636.Google Scholar
Nakao, M, Lavikainen, A and Hoberg, E (2015) Is Echinococcus intermedius a valid species? Trends in Parasitology 31, 342343.Google Scholar
Nikmanesh, B, et al. (2014) Genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus isolates from human clinical samples based on sequencing of mitochondrial genes in Iran, Tehran. Iranian Journal of Parasitology 9, 2027.Google Scholar
Pednekar, RP, et al. (2009) Molecular and morphological characterisation of Echinococcus from food producing animals in India. Veterinary Parasitology 165, 5865.Google Scholar
Pezeshki, A, et al. (2013) Genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus from domestic animals and humans from Ardabil Province, northwest Iran. Journal of Helminthology 87, 387391.Google Scholar
Possenti, A, et al. (2016) Potential risk factors associated with human cystic echinococcosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10, e0005114.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A (2014) Figtree, a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A, et al. (2014) Tracer v1.6, Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.Google Scholar
Rannamäe, E, et al. (2016) Maternal and paternal genetic diversity of ancient sheep in Estonia from the Late Bronze Age to the post-medieval period and comparison with other regions in Eurasia. Animal Genetics 47, 208218.Google Scholar
Romig, T, Ebi, D and Wassermann, M (2015) Taxonomy and molecular epidemiology of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. Veterinary Parasitology 213, 7684.Google Scholar
Rostami, S, et al. (2015) Genetic characterization of Echinococcus granulosus from a large number of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of human isolates in Iran. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 92, 588594.Google Scholar
Saarma, U, et al. (2007) Mitogenetic structure of brown bears (Ursus arctos L.) in northeastern Europe and a new time frame for the formation of European brown bear lineages. Molecular Ecology 16, 401413.Google Scholar
Saarma, U, et al. (2009) A novel phylogeny for the genus Echinococcus, based on nuclear data, challenges relationships based on mitochondrial evidence. Parasitology 136, 317328.Google Scholar
Santucci, F, Emerson, BC and Hewitt, GM (1998) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of European hedgehogs. Molecular Ecology 7, 11631172.Google Scholar
Schmitt, T and Varga, Z (2012) Extra-Mediterranean refugia: the rule and not the exception? Frontiers in Zoology 9, 22.Google Scholar
Sharbatkhori, M, et al. (2011) Sequence analysis of cox1 and nad1 genes in Echinococcus granulosus G3 genotype in camels (Camelus dromedarius) from central Iran. Parasitology Research 108, 521527.Google Scholar
Sharbatkhori, M, et al. (2016) Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato genotypes in domestic livestock and humans in Golestan province, Iran. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 58, 38.Google Scholar
Sharma, M, et al. (2013a) Genetic diversity and population genetic structure analysis of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto complex based on mitochondrial DNA signature. PLoS ONE 8, e82904.Google Scholar
Sharma, M, et al. (2013b) Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus cysts in north Indian patients: identification of G1, G3, G5 and G6 genotypes. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2262.Google Scholar
Simsek, S, Kaplan, M and Ozercan, IH (2011) A comprehensive molecular survey of Echinococcus granulosus in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues in human isolates in Turkey. Parasitology Research 109, 411416.Google Scholar
Šnábel, V, et al. (2009) Cystic echinococcosis in Turkey: genetic variability and first record of the pig strain (G7) in the country. Parasitology Research 105, 145.Google Scholar
Taberlet, P and Bouvet, J (1994) Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism, phylogeography, and conservation genetics of the brown bear Ursus arctos in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 255, 195200.Google Scholar
Tajima, F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585595.Google Scholar
Tamura, K and Nei, M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10, 512526.Google Scholar
Thompson, R (2008) The taxonomy, phylogeny and transmission of Echinococcus. Experimental Parasitology 119, 439446.Google Scholar
Thompson, RA and McManus, DP (2002) Towards a taxonomic revision of the genus Echinococcus. Trends in Parasitology 18, 452457.Google Scholar
Torgerson, PR and Budke, CM (2003) Echinococcosis – an international public health challenge. Research in Veterinary Science 74, 191202.Google Scholar
Varcasia, A, et al. (2007) Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus in sheep and goats of Peloponnesus, Greece. Parasitology Research 101, 11351139.Google Scholar
Varcasia, A, et al. (2011) Cystic Echinococcosis in Sardinia: farmers' knowledge and dog infection in sheep farms. Veterinary Parasitology 181, 335340.Google Scholar
Wassermann, M, et al. (2016) A novel zoonotic genotype related to Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto from southern Ethiopia. International Journal for Parasitology 46, 663668.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2015). Investing to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: Third WHO report on neglected tropical diseases, pp. 9599.Google Scholar
Yanagida, T, et al. (2012) Genetic polymorphisms of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in the Middle East. Parasitology International 61, 599603.Google Scholar
Yanagida, T, et al. (2017) Specific status of Echinococcus canadensis (Cestoda: Taeniidae) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. International Journal for Parasitology 47, 971979.Google Scholar
Yang, Z (1994) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39, 306314.Google Scholar
Yindee, M, et al. (2010) Y-chromosomal variation confirms independent domestications of swamp and river buffalo. Animal Genetics 41, 433435.Google Scholar
Zait, H, et al. (2016) Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto and Echinococcus canadensis in humans and livestock from Algeria. Parasitology Research 115, 24232431.Google Scholar
Zeder, MA (2008) Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean basin: origins, diffusion, and impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 1159711604.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kinkar et al. supplementary material 1

Kinkar et al. supplementary material

Download Kinkar et al. supplementary material 1(PDF)
PDF 185.7 KB