Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:31:55.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Practice and Self-Reflection in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Training: What Factors Influence Trainees’ Engagement and Experience of Benefit?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2012

James Bennett-Levy*
Affiliation:
University Centre for Rural Health (North Coast), University of Sydney, Lismore, Australia
Nicole K. Lee
Affiliation:
National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
*
Reprint requests to James Bennett-Levy, University Centre for Rural Health (North Coast), University of Sydney, PO Box 3074, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia. E-mail: james.bennett-levy@ucrh.edu.au

Abstract

Background: Previous studies of self-practice/self-reflection (SP/SR) CBT training have found that trainees report significant benefits from practising CBT techniques on themselves (self-practice) and reflecting on their experience (self-reflection) as a formal part of their CBT training. However, not all trainees experience the same level of benefit from SP/SR and not all types of training course produce benefits to the same extent. Aims: This paper examines the question: What factors influence trainees’ reported benefit from SP/SR? The aim was to develop a model to maximize the value of SP/SR training. Method: The authors used a grounded theory analysis of four SP/SR training courses, varying along several dimensions, to derive a model that could account for the data. Results: A model was derived comprising of seven elements: Two outcomes – “Experience of Benefit” and “Engagement with the Process” – that mutually influence one another; and five other influencing factors – “Course Structure and Requirements”, “Expectation of Benefit”, “Feeling of Safety with the Process”, “Group Process”, and “Available Personal Resources” – that mediate the impact on Engagement with the Process and Experience of Benefit from SP/SR. Conclusions: A model that provides guidance about the best ways to set up and develop SP/SR programs has been developed. This model may now be subject to empirical testing by trainers and researchers. Implications and recommendations for the design and development of future SP/SR programs are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. D. (2001). Experiential groups in counselor education: student attitudes and instructor participation. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 111119.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Freeman, A. and Associates, (1990). Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Beck, J. (1995). Cognitive Therapy: basics and beyond. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Beidas, R. S. and Kendall, P. C. (2010). Training therapists in evidence-based practice: a critical review of studies from a systems-contextual perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17, 130.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J. (2006). Therapist skills: a cognitive model of their acquisition and refinement. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 5778.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J., Lee, N., Travers, K., Pohlman, S. and Hamernik, E. (2003). Cognitive therapy from the inside: enhancing therapist skills through practising what we preach. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 31, 145163.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J., McManus, F., Westling, B. and Fennell, M. J. V. (2009a). Acquiring and refining CBT skills and competencies: which training methods are perceived to be most effective? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 571583.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J. and Thwaites, R. (2007). Self and self-reflection in the therapeutic relationship: a conceptual map and practical strategies for the training, supervision and self-supervision of interpersonal skills. In Gilbert, P. and Leahy, R. (Eds.), The Therapeutic Relationship in the Cognitive Behavioural Psychotherapies (pp. 255281). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J., Thwaites, R., Chaddock, A. and Davis, M. (2009b). Reflective practice in cognitive behavioural therapy. In Stedmon, J. and Dallos, R. (Eds.), Reflective Practice in Psychotherapy and Counselling (pp. 115135). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J., Turner, F., Beaty, T., Smith, M., Paterson, B. and Farmer, S. (2001). The value of self-practice of cognitive therapy techniques and self-reflection in the training of cognitive therapists. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 203220.Google Scholar
Burns, S. (1996). Artistry in Training. Warriewood, NSW: Business and Professional Publishing.Google Scholar
Chaddock, A. (2007). Can the Use of a Self-Practice/Self-Reflection Approach Enhance the Therapeutic Skills and Attitudes of Trainee Cognitive-Behavioural Therapists? Unpublished DClinPsy Thesis, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A. and Noe, R. A. (2000). Towards an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678707.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (2008). The Impact of a Self-Practice/Self-Reflection Programme on the Therapeutic Skills and Beliefs of Experienced Cognitive-Behavioural Therapists. Unpublished DClinPsy Thesis, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
DeRubeis, R. J., Evans, M. D., Hollon, S. D., Garvey, M. J., Grove, W. M. and Tuason, V. B. (1990). How does cognitive therapy work? Cognitive change and symptom change in cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 862869.Google Scholar
Fairburn, C. G. and Cooper, Z. (2011). Therapist competence, therapy quality, and therapist training. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 373378.Google Scholar
Farrand, P., Perry, J. and Linsley, S. (2010). Enhancing self-practice/self-reflection (SP/SR) approach to cognitive behaviour training through the use of reflective blogs. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 473477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feiner, S. E. (1998). Course design: an integration of didactic and experiential approaches to graduate training of group therapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 48, 439460.Google Scholar
Fennell, M. (2010). Training skills. In Mueller, M., Kennerley, H., McManus, F. and Westbrook, D. (Eds.), The Oxford Guide to Surviving as a CBT Therapist (pp. 371405). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Greenberg, L. S. (1991). Research on the process of change. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 316.Google Scholar
Haarhoff, B., and Farrand, P. (2012). Reflective and self-evaluative practice in CBT. In Dryden, W. and Branch, R. (Eds.), The CBT Handbook (pp. 475492). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Haarhoff, B., Gibson, K. and Flett, R. (2011). Improving the quality of cognitive behaviour therapy case conceptualization: the role of self-practice/self-reflection. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 39, 323339.Google Scholar
Henry, W. P., Schacht, T. E., Strupp, H. H., Butler, S. F. and Binder, J. L. (1993). Effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: mediators of therapists' responses to training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 441447.Google Scholar
Henry, W. P., Strupp, H. H., Butler, S. F., Schacht, T. E. and Binder, J. L. (1993). Effects of training in time-limited psychotherapy: changes in therapist behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 434440.Google Scholar
Laireiter, A.-R. and Willutzki, U. (2003). Self-reflection and self-practice in training of cognitive behaviour therapy: an overview. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10, 1930.Google Scholar
Lasky, G. B. and Riva, M. T. (2006). Confidentiality and privileged communication in group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 56, 455476.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Woelfel, M. W. and Light, S. C. (1987). The buffering effects of social support subsequent to an important life event. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 247263.Google Scholar
Macran, S. and Shapiro, D. (1998). The role of personal therapy for therapists: a review. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71, 1325.Google Scholar
Milne, D. L. (2009). Evidence-Based Clinical Supervision. Chichester: BPS Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milne, D. L., Baker, C., Blackburn, I., James, I. and Reichelt, K. (1999). Effectiveness of cognitive therapy training. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 30, 8192.Google Scholar
Milne, D. L., Leck, C. and Choudhri, N. Z. (2009). Collusion in clinical supervision: literature review and case study in self-reflection. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2, 106114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, C. F. (2010). Competency in conducting cognitive-behavioral therapy: foundational, functional, and supervisory aspects. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 1219.Google Scholar
Osborn, C. J., Daninhirsch, C. L. and Page, B. J. (2003). Experiential training in group counseling: humanistic processess in practice. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 42, 1428.Google Scholar
Padesky, C. A. (1996). Developing cognitive therapist competency: teaching and supervision models. In Salkovskis, P. M. (Ed.), Frontiers of Cognitive Therapy (pp. 266292). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Payne, H. (2001). Student experiences in a personal development group: the question of safety. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 4, 267292.Google Scholar
Rakovshik, S. G. and McManus, F. (2010). Establishing evidence-based training in cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of current empirical findings and theoretical guidance. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 496516.Google Scholar
Ramsden, P. (1984). The context of learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (Eds.), The Experience of Learning (pp. 144164). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Richards, T. J. and Richards, L. (1991). The NUD*IST qualitative data analysis system. Qualitative Sociology, 14, 307324.Google Scholar
Safran, J. D. and Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the Therapeutic Alliance: a relational treatment guide. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. and Bennett-Levy, J. (2010). When therapists have problems: what can CBT do for us? In Mueller, M., Kennerley, H., McManus, F. and Westbrook, D. (Eds.), The Oxford Guide to Surviving as a CBT Therapist (pp. 457480). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sutton, L., Townend, M. and Wright, J. (2007). The experiences of reflective learning journals by cognitive behavioural psychotherapy students. Reflective Practice, 8, 387404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, H. A. and Dozois, D. J. A. (2006). Preparing clients for cognitive behavioral therapy: a randomized pilot study of motivational interviewing for anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 481498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. M., Moorey, S. and Cobb, J. (1991). Training in cognitive-behaviour therapy: pilot evaluation of a training course using the Cognitive Therapy Scale. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 19, 373376.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.