Two broad aims drive weed science research: improved management and improvedunderstanding of weed biology and ecology. In recent years, agriculturalweed research addressing these two aims has effectively split into separatesubdisciplines despite repeated calls for greater integration. Although someexcellent work is being done, agricultural weed research has developed avery high level of repetitiveness, a preponderance of purely descriptivestudies, and has failed to clearly articulate novel hypotheses linked toestablished bodies of ecological and evolutionary theory. In contrast,invasive plant research attracts a diverse cadre of nonweed scientists usinginvasions to explore broader and more integrated biological questionsgrounded in theory. We propose that although studies focused on weedmanagement remain vitally important, agricultural weed research wouldbenefit from deeper theoretical justification, a broader vision, andincreased collaboration across diverse disciplines. To initiate change inthis direction, we call for more emphasis on interdisciplinary training forweed scientists, and for focused workshops and working groups to developspecific areas of research and promote interactions among weed scientistsand with the wider scientific community.
