We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Recent work demonstrated that detection of SARS-CoV-2 on the floor of long-term care facilities is associated with impending COVID-19 outbreaks. It is unknown if similar results will be observed in hospitals.
Methods:
Floor swabs were prospectively collected weekly from healthcare worker-only areas (eg, staff locker rooms) at two hospitals in Ontario, Canada for 39 weeks. Floor swabs were processed for SARS-CoV-2 using quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Results were reported as percentage of positive floor swabs and viral copy number. Grouped fivefold cross-validation was used to evaluate model outbreak discrimination.
Results:
SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected on 537 of 760 floor swabs (71%). At Hospital A, overall positivity was 90% (95% CI: 85%–93%; N = 280); at Hospital B, overall positivity was 60% (95% CI: 55%–64%; N = 480). There were four COVID-19 outbreaks at Hospital A and seven at Hospital B during the study period. The outbreaks consisted of primarily patient cases (ie, 140 patient cases and 4 staff cases). For every 10-fold increase in viral copies, there was a 22-fold higher odds of a COVID-19 outbreak (OR = 22.0, 95% CI 7.3, 91.8). The cross-validated area under the receiver operating curve for SARS-CoV-2 viral copies for predicting a contemporaneous outbreak was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82–0.90).
Conclusion:
Viral burden of SARS-CoV-2 on floors, even in healthcare worker-only areas, was strongly associated with COVID-19 outbreaks in those hospital wards. Built environment sampling may support hospital COVID-19 outbreak identification, fill gaps in traditional surveillance, and guide infection prevention and control measures.
Background: Statistically significant decreases in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) occurred in Veterans Health Administration (VA) facilities from 2007 to 2019 using active surveillance for facility admissions and contact precautions for patients colonized (CPC) or infected (CPI) with MRSA, but the value of these interventions is controversial. Objective: To determine the impact of active surveillance, CPC, and CPI on prevention MRSA HAIs, we conducted a prospective cohort study between July 2020 and June 2022 in all 123 acute-care VA medical facilities. In April 2020, all facilities were given the option to suspend any combination of active surveillance, CPC, or CPI to free up laboratory resources for COVID-19 testing and conserve personal protective equipment. We measured MRSA HAIs (cases per 1,000 patient days) in intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICUs by the infection control policy. Results: During the analysis period, there were 917,591 admissions, 5,225,174 patient days, and 568 MRSA HAIs. Only 20% of facilities continued all 3 MRSA infection control measures in July 2020, but this rate increased to 57% by June 2022. The MRSA HAI rate for all infection sites in non-ICUs was 0.07 (95% CI, 0.05–0.08) for facilities practicing active surveillance plus CPC plus CPI compared to 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08–0.19; P = .01) for those not practicing any of these strategies, and in ICUs the MRSA HAI rates were 0.20 (95% CI, 0.15–0.26) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.41–0.98; P < .001) for the respective policies. Similar differences were seen when the analyses were restricted to MRSA bloodstream HAIs. Accounting for monthly COVID-19 admissions to facilities over the analysis period using a negative binomial regression model did not change the relationships between facility policy and MRSA HAI rates in the ICUs or non-ICUs. There was no statistically significant difference in monthly facility urinary catheter-associated infection rates, a nonequivalent dependent variable, in the categories during the analysis period in either ICUs or non-ICUs. Conclusions: In Veterans Affairs medical centers, there were fewer MRSA HAIs when facilities practiced active surveillance and contact precautions for colonized or infected patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The effect was greater in ICUs than non-ICUs.
Advancements in prototyping technologies – haptics and extended reality – are creating exciting new environments to enhance stakeholder and user interaction with design concepts. These interactions can now occur earlier in the design process, transforming feedback mechanisms resulting in greater and faster iterations. This is essential for bringing right-first-time products to market as quickly as possible.
While existing feedback tools, such as speak-aloud, surveys and/or questionnaires, are a useful means for capturing user feedback and reflections on interactions, there is a desire to explicitly map user feedback to their physical prototype interaction. Over the past decade, several hand-tracking tools have been developed that can, in principle, capture product user interaction.
In this paper, we explore the capability of the LeapMotion Controller, MediaPipe and Manus Prime X Haptic gloves to capture user interaction with prototypes. A broad perspective of capability is adopted, including accuracy as well as the practical aspects of knowledge, skills, and ease of use. In this study, challenges in accuracy, occlusion and data processing were elicited in the capture and translation of user interaction into design insights.
Increasing attention has been paid in recent years to the role of landscape, environment and place in the De gestis Britonum and two vernacular translations and adaptations, Wace's Roman de Brut and Laȝamon's Brut. This essay builds on that work by considering the ways in which landscapes are re-presented across these works in various contexts pertaining to concealment, whether planned and considered, such as ambushes, or out of necessity, such as when we find armies making a tactical retreat, or routed and in flight. The process of adapting and translating landscapes in these works, as we hope to demonstrate, offers interesting ways of understanding how these authors were making sense of physical and textual landscapes in their own writing and in their sources. We have chosen to examine several episodes that operate in this way, drawing on archaeological methods that stress the shifting nature of the landscape in accordance with temporality and seasonality, and which recognize that the landscape is not a static backdrop, but is an active presence which interacts in complex ways with weather and the time of day, not to mention human activity.
Geoffrey of Monmouth's De gestis Britonum became very popular from the moment it was completed in the mid-twelfth century. It survives in various versions in 225 manuscripts and was widely translated and adapted into different vernaculars. It is generally accepted that the civil war of the mid-twelfth century between Empress Matilda and her cousin King Stephen provides the context for Geoffrey's narrative of the rise and fall of kings and peoples. He had certainly completed the work, dedicated to Matilda's half-brother, Robert of Gloucester, by 1139 when Henry of Huntingdon was amazed to find a copy of it in the library of the abbey of Le Bec. The conflict continued until the treaty of Wallingford in 1153 which recognized Matilda's son Henry as Stephen's heir. He became king in 1154 and a year later Wace completed his Norman French verse version of De gestis Britonum, known today as the Roman de Brut, which he presented to the Angevin court. This text, also incorporating information from Bede and elsewhere, was substantially the basis for Laȝamon's Brut, whose specific date is not our focus in this essay, but which might have been completed anywhere between the death of Henry and the later thirteenth-century contexts of the two surviving Brut manuscripts.
Using a machine-learning model, we examined drivers of antibiotic prescribing for antibiotic-inappropriate acute respiratory illnesses in a large US claims data set. Antibiotics were prescribed in 11% of the 42 million visits in our sample. The model identified outpatient setting type, patient age mix, and state as top drivers of prescribing.
Mars exploration motivates the search for extraterrestrial life, the development of space technologies, and the design of human missions and habitations. Here, we seek new insights and pose unresolved questions relating to the natural history of Mars, habitability, robotic and human exploration, planetary protection, and the impacts on human society. Key observations and findings include:
– high escape rates of early Mars' atmosphere, including loss of water, impact present-day habitability;
– putative fossils on Mars will likely be ambiguous biomarkers for life;
– microbial contamination resulting from human habitation is unavoidable; and
– based on Mars' current planetary protection category, robotic payload(s) should characterize the local martian environment for any life-forms prior to human habitation.
Some of the outstanding questions are:
– which interpretation of the hemispheric dichotomy of the planet is correct;
– to what degree did deep-penetrating faults transport subsurface liquids to Mars' surface;
– in what abundance are carbonates formed by atmospheric processes;
– what properties of martian meteorites could be used to constrain their source locations;
– the origin(s) of organic macromolecules;
– was/is Mars inhabited;
– how can missions designed to uncover microbial activity in the subsurface eliminate potential false positives caused by microbial contaminants from Earth;
– how can we ensure that humans and microbes form a stable and benign biosphere; and
– should humans relate to putative extraterrestrial life from a biocentric viewpoint (preservation of all biology), or anthropocentric viewpoint of expanding habitation of space?
Studies of Mars' evolution can shed light on the habitability of extrasolar planets. In addition, Mars exploration can drive future policy developments and confirm (or put into question) the feasibility and/or extent of human habitability of space.
The Inquisitions post mortem (IPMs) are a truly wonderful source for many different aspects of late medieval countryside and rural life. They have recently been made digitally accessible and interrogatable by the Mapping the Medieval Countryside project, and the first fruits of these developments are presented here. The chapters examine IPMs in connection with the landscape and topography of England, in particular markets and fairs and mills; and consider the utility of proofs of age for everyday life on such topics as the Church, retaining, and the wine trade.
Michael Hicks is Emeritus Professor of Medieval History at the University of Winchester.
Contributors: Katie A. Clarke, William S. Deller, Paul Dryburgh, Christopher Dyer, Janette Garrett, Michael Hicks, Matthew Holford, Gordon McKelvie, Stephen Mileson, Simon Payling, Matthew Tompkins, Jennifer Ward.
The Inquisitions post mortem (IPMs) of Edward V and Richard III are part of a vast archive that are housed at The National Archives (TNA, formerly the Public Record Office). IPMs record government enquiries into the landed estates that feudal tenants held at the time of their deaths. There are 2,163 files of IPMs returned to the court of chancery from the 1230s to 1642 that are arranged by reigns (classes C132–142). They are a huge repository of data about past landowners, their dates of death, their heirs and the ages of the heirs, and the particular properties that they held in every county. There are also IPMs of the palatine counties of Chester, Durham and Lancaster that were originally recorded elsewhere and also survive today at TNA. All these landowners and their lands from all the IPMs up to 1485 were listed in four massive volumes by the Record Commission in 1828. The calendars of inquisitions post mortem (CIPMs) record this data systematically landholder by landholder, county by county and property by property in twenty-six volumes up to 1447; in another three volumes calendar are those from 1485 to 1509. These calendars converted Latin text in medieval handwriting, often faded, tattered and stained, into print in modern English. The CIPMs preserve all the essential information whilst removing repetition and common forms. Their publication is one of the most remarkable cooperative endeavours of the past 150 years: truly a great historical enterprise. That the series remains incomplete is most regrettable. The unpublished IPMs are difficult to access and analyse and will inevitably deteriorate with mere handling. The gap in the calendars from 1447 to 1485, covering Wars of the Roses and Yorkist kings, is especially missed and is unlikely to change in the near future given current funding in the UK.
The IPMs in this volume have been transcribed and calendared, published and funded by the British Academy, the Richard III and Yorkist History Trust, and the largely unremunerated labours of the researcher Dr Gordon McKelvie. Access to the published calendars was greatly extended forever by British History Online up to 1422 and for 1485–1509 and from 1422–47 on the Mapping website, both generously funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council. The IPMs in this volume will be added to both websites from 2024.