We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Stroke due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO) carries poor outcomes despite advancements in endovascular therapy (EVT). Predictors of recovery remain underexplored. This study evaluates clinical and imaging predictors of outcomes following EVT, including a Critical Area Diffusion Score (CADS), assessing infarct location and extent in critical brainstem regions on post-EVT MRI.
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed 48 BAO patients treated with EVT at a provincial stroke center (2015–2021). Patients were categorized by outcomes (favorable: modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–3; unfavorable: mRS 4–6). Clinical, demographic and imaging data – age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), reperfusion success (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] 2b–3) and post-EVT CADS from diffusion-weighted MRI – were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
Results:
Patients with favorable outcomes were younger (median 64.0 vs. 73.0 years, p = 0.031), had lower NIHSS scores at presentation (median 8 vs. 16, p = 0.018) and achieved higher successful reperfusion rates (81.0% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.020). CADS ≤ 3 was linked to better outcomes (median mRS 3 vs. 5, p = 0.026) and higher odds of recovery in univariate analysis (OR = 10.89, p = 0.038). However, in multivariate analysis, CADS was not an independent predictor, with successful reperfusion (OR = 18.8, p = 0.044) as the strongest factor.
Conclusion:
Age, NIHSS scores and successful reperfusion predict recovery in BAO patients undergoing EVT. Although CADS ≤ 3 is linked to favorable outcomes, it is not independently predictive. CADS holds promise as a prognostic tool, but its utility should be considered alongside clinical markers to enhance outcome prediction in BAO.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.