We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Diagnostic criteria for narcissistic personality disorder primarily focus on grandiosity and significance. In psychotherapeutic work, it is important to distinguish two subtypes of pathological narcissism: narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. One of the manifestations of narcissistic traits is unstable or unformed self-esteem, manifested in attempts to conform to ideals. A part of modern society perceives the female body as an object that “needs to be looked at”. Self-objectification refers to a learned pattern of self-assessment of the importance of one’s body and appearance compared to other aspects of the self. Self-observation and comparison of oneself with others is one of the manifestations of self-objectification. With acts of auto aggression, the body becomes a tool or a means to solve psychological problems. In order for this to become possible, the ability to objectify your body “to look at it from the outside” plays an important role.
Objectives
Analysis of the relationship between non-suicidal self-injurious behavior and narcissistic personality traits in young women with depression and young women without a psychiatric diagnosis.
Methods
Тhe study included 49 women divided into two groups. The first group included 24 patients with depression undergoing inpatient treatment (mean age 18.4). The second group included 25 healthy subjects (mean age 18 years). The methods: The answer to the question “Sometimes I purposely injure myself” was used as an indicator of self-harm (NSSI) (five-point Likert scale); “Ich structure test” (ISTA); “Physical Appearance Comparison Scale-Revised” (PACS-R).
Results
In the clinical group, a significant association of severity of NSSI with indicators of “deficit narcissism” was revealed (Spearman r=,534*). Correlations were found between the severity of NSSI and PACS-R (r=,344**). In the clinical group, there was no connection between “Comparison with others” and narcissistic traits. In a group of healthy subjects, significant associations of NSSI severity with “destructive narcissism” (,572**) and PACS-R (,576**) were revealed. In the clinical group, the severity of NSSI is associated with a more serious pathology - the lack of formation of “normal” narcissism, and in the healthy group it is more likely to be deformed narcissism. Self-objectification and comparison of oneself with others in the clinical group is not associated with manifestations of narcissistic traits, such connections are demonstrated in the group of healthy young women.
Conclusions
It is shown that in the clinical group of depressed young women, the severity of self-harming behavior is associated with “deficit narcissism”, and in healthy young women, first of all, with “destructive narcissism” with an increased need to compare themselves with others.
Schizophrenia is affecting multiple functions such as cognition, perception, emotion, and social behaviors, and it has also been shown to influence artistic works created by patients. Among the deviations observed in the art works are distinct characteristics like delusional themes, disordered shorter lines, and unique creativity. Such features, along with altered pictorial perceptions and possibly altered motoric function, suggest that it might be possible to differentiate art made by schizophrenic patients from that of healthy individuals. Given the shortcomings of existing diagnostic methods being very long and with a 25% error rate, we proposed a novel neural network model that leverages these artistic markers for classification to support diagnosis.
Objectives
To develop and train a neural network model leveraging unique artistic markers for the classification and support of diagnosing schizophrenia.
Methods
Our study involved 764 participants, 45% diagnosed with schizophrenia, while the others were either healthy or diagnosed with other mental disorders. The average age of the participants was 38.25 years (SD=13.43), and 43.88% of the participants were females. All participants were instructed to draw eight drawings of human faces. These drawings were digitized and categorized based on participants’ schizophrenia status to form the initial training dataset for our model. This data was processed using Python and converted into a NumPy array, which served as input for our model developed using the Keras library. The structure of the model is presented (Image 1).
Results
We used area under curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity as key evaluation metrics for our model. The model achieved an AUC of 0.90 on a test dataset that was new to the model and was not used in the preceding training phase. It exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and a specificity of 0.85, indicating its capacity to identify schizophrenic and non-schizophrenic individuals, respectively (Image 2).
Image:
Image 2:
Conclusions
The application of machine learning and AI tools to analyze art created by schizophrenia patients, can offer a promising methodology for exploring the differences between schizophrenic and healthy individuals, as well as a possible support for current diagnostic methods. This approach has the potential to provide an additional fast and more accurate diagnosis, enhancing individualized patient care. Future research will focus on refining and validating the model across diverse populations and various art forms.
This volume offers an important vision of co-operation as an alternative to the neoliberal market, exploring the cooperative model's potential for driving environmental and socio-economic transformation in the post-COVID world.
This study examines phonological and phonetic properties of ATR contrasts in the vowel system of Akebu (Kwa). The sum of descriptive evidence, including vowel harmony, vowel distribution in non-harmonising contexts, vowel reduction and typological and etymological considerations, indicates a rare vowel inventory with an ATR contrast in front/back vowels but a height contrast in the three redundantly [−ATR] central vowels /ᵻ, ə, a/. This analysis was checked against four common acoustic metrics of ATR: F1 and F2 frequencies, spectral slope and F1 bandwidth size (B1). As expected, the results for the last three metrics were variable across speakers and vowel types, and are therefore inconclusive. The results for F1 were consistent but do not distinguish between ATR and vowel height. Two results nonetheless suggest the [−ATR] status of central vowels: they occupy the same belt of F1 frequencies and show the same position of observed-over-predicted B1 values as front and back [−ATR] vowels.
Layers of volcanic ash and Andosol soils derived from the ash may play an important role in preserving snow and ice as well as in the development of permafrost conditions in (a) the immediate vicinity of volcanoes at high elevations or at high latitudes and (b) land areas that are often distant from volcanic activity and are either prone to permafrost or covered by snow and ice, but have been affected by subaerial ash deposition. The special properties of volcanic ash are critically reviewed, particularly in relation to recent research in Kamchatka in the Far East of Russia. Of special importance are the thermal properties, the unfrozen water contents of ash layers, and the rate of volcanic glass weathering.Weathering of volcanic glass results in the development of amorphous clay minerals (e.g. allophane, opal, palagonite), but occurs at a much slower rate under cold compared to warm climate conditions. Existing data reveal (1) a strong correlation between the thermal conductivity, the water/ice content, and the mineralogy of the weathered part of the volcanic ash, (2) that an increase in the amounts of amorphous clay minerals (allophane, palagonite) increases the proportion of unfrozen water and decreases the thermal conductivity, and (3) that amorphous silica does not alter to halloysite or other clay minerals, even in the Early Pleistocene age (Kamchatka) volcanic ashes or in the Miocene and Pliocene deposits of Antarctica due to the cold temperatures. The significance of these findings are discussed in relation to past climate reconstruction and the influence of volcanic ash on permafrost aggradation and degradation, snow and ice ablation, and the development of glaciers.
The three sections of this book move from local case studies of cooperativism to examples of systemic designs, especially in the form of CWB, that incorporate co-operation in the widest sense of the word. The Preston Model and its budding offshoot in Japan are just two examples of a changing mindset in how life, space and work can be organized, with human beings taking centre stage. The Preston Model is highlighted in this book because of recent attention to its successes and influence and its focus on co-operation. The Preston Model has captured the imagination and ignited hopes and desires for change. We do not claim that the Preston Model is uniquely innovative. Not only does it have its roots in Cleveland and Mondragon, but there are many versions of CWB or the social economy dotted around the world, each with its local touch. Some are recent, as in Barcelona or Cincinnati, and others have been established for several decades, as is the case of the ‘Chantier’ system of social and economic innovation in Quebec (Mendell, 2009). It does seem, however, that the development of the Preston Model is uniquely situated at a moment of social and economic change in the UK with significant outreach and influence – as in the national economies of Scotland and Wales – that is not common to all such systemic innovations.
It is no longer incontestably accepted that the neoliberal modality of the capitalist system based squarely on competition and hierarchical structures of reward can solve its own problems in a world beset by multiplying and recurring crises. This is why a growing number of academics and public intellectuals argue in favour of market plurality and many endorse the cooperative model of organizing as a promising alternative to market orthodoxy, capable of advancing more socially balanced and participatory practices (Stiglitz, 2002; Porritt, 2007; Restakis, 2010; Birchall, 2013). The authors of this book align with this thinking and have engaged with the task of outlining thoughts of an exciting future of co-operation as a force that can counteract the failures and shortcomings of the neoliberal way of engaging the market and the competition that accompanies it.
The background to this book is an almost overwhelming and growing list of international tensions of various kinds: a pandemic, the climate emergency, the struggle for social justice as manifested in the Black Lives Matter movement, an alarming rise of extremist right-wing political positions, the politics of austerity, wage stagnation, growing inequalities, the refugee crises and, at the time of writing, the ‘cost of living’ crisis in Europe; all, combined with and partly as a result of the Russian military conflict with Ukraine, are causing serious social and economic uncertainties that bring into question previously held socio-economic expectations of citizens in 21st-century Europe. The present volume cannot hope to pretend to offer solutions to these multiple challenges, but nevertheless intends to present the reader with a consideration of the potential of co-operatives and cooperation as a means of reconstructing some of the damaged aspirations of the 20th century, as the 21st gets underway.
It is a premise of this book to argue that co-operatives per se are an important and globally relevant organizational form for business. They are an economic force with a wide-ranging social and economic imprint. In Europe alone, agricultural co-operatives process 60 per cent of all agricultural produce and there are 4,000 co-operative banks with 50 million members and a market share of 20 per cent (Dilger et al, 2017; Gouveia, 2012; World Coop Monitor, nd). The UK co-operative sector alone showed a £39.7 billion turnover in 2021, employed 250,128 people and had 13.9 million members (Co-op Economy, 2021). Over time, co-operatives have credibly established a reputation of organizations being most resilient to calamities and highly productive in pooling resources to achieve both economic and social value-driven outcomes (Roelants, 2013). Despite these facts, business and management literature often give the impression that co-operatives exist on the periphery of the modern economy and, as a result, the contribution of co-operatives to the GDP and their wide-ranging social imprint does not translate into a matching societal recognition (Develtere et al, 2008).
In March 2013, the British financial sector was shocked by the news that one of the larger banks in the country, the Co-operative Bank, had accumulated losses of £600 million. Later in the year, it emerged that the Bank had a shortfall in its capital of about £1.5 billion, putting the bank on the brink of collapse. Until then, the Co-operative Bank plc had been 100 per cent owned by The Co-operative Group. The rescue operation required a major restructuring, following which the Co-operative Group's shareholding fell to 30 per cent. Later, in 2017, in the course of a second restructuring, the Group was forced to sell all its remaining shares, leaving the bank 100 per cent owned by private equity, mostly US hedge funds. The sad irony of the story was that the institution created to advance the principles of fairness, co-operation and mutuality had ended up in the hands of organizations that for many were the epitome of capitalist greed and exclusivity.
Much of the blame for the near collapse of the bank centred on the blatant incompetence of the directors putting in doubt the workability of the cooperative participatory principles, allowing unqualified people to sit on the board of a major cooperative company. The spotlight was on the Reverend Paul Flowers. As Chairman of the Co-operative Bank, he presided over the policies that had led the Bank to a catastrophe. An investigation by the Financial Conduct Authority found Flowers entirely unfit for the job, to which Flowers progressed through the elective processes of United Cooperatives. He had never worked in banking in any senior capacity when, in March 2010, he was put at the helm of the Co-operative Bank – a bank with £50 billion of assets, £36 billion of customer deposits and 4.7 million customers. However, there were people who saw the problem not in the principle but in its implementation. Rob Harrison, editor of Ethical Consumer magazine and an activist for the Save Our Bank campaign, argued that the implementation of cooperative principles in the management of mutual societies was predominantly a question of training and education: ‘You need to spend lots of money on training people because they aren't necessarily going to turn up with all you need to manage a complicated company.
Flexible work arrangements promote not only acceptable and convenient work modes; for many professionals flexible work leads to increase in workload and in working time (Rubery et al., 2016; Thompson et al., 2015). As the result, lack of recreation time could be named as a direct consequence of high workload (Pang, 2017). The key problem is the investigation of attitudes towards recreation and recovery: are professionals more reactive or proactive in their recreation planning, and do they recover well?
Objectives
The aim of the research: to reveal (1) typical types of recreation planning for professionals with high level of work flexibility and (2) recovery efficiency level.
Methods
The research was conducted in representatives of various professions, who work in flexible work arrangements (n=378). The diagnostic set included inventories for assessment of recreation planning type (Luzyanina, Kuznetsova, 2014) and recovery efficiency (Leonova, 2019).
Results
Two types of recreation planning have been found: proactive (26% of respondents) and reactive (74%). For the reactive approach lack of targeted strategies of recreation planning has been found. Proactive approach is characterized by tracking signs of resources decrease and advance planning of work breaks. There are differences in recovery efficiency (p<0,001) in proactive and reactive professionals: non-efficient recovery is typical for the majority of professionals with the reactive type to recreation planning.
Conclusions
The detailed analysis of proactive/reactive approaches manifestations and peculiarities of recreation planning could help to predict not only the recovery level, but the mechanisms of advanced self-regulation, adequate to high work flexibility.