The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research (EXAMINER) is a validated laptop-based battery of executive functioning tests. A modified tablet version of the EXAMINER was developed on the UCSF Tablet-based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT-EXAMINER). Here we describe the battery and investigate the reliability and validity of a composite score.

A diagnostically heterogeneous sample of 2135 individuals (mean age = 65.58, SD = 16.07), including controls and participants with a variety of neurodegenerative syndromes, completed the TabCAT-EXAMINER. A composite score was developed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Validity was evaluated via linear regressions that tested associations with neuropsychological tests, demographics, clinical diagnosis, and disease severity. Replicability of cross-sectional results was tested in a separate sample of participants (n = 342) recruited from a frontotemporal dementia study. As this separate sample also collected longitudinal TabCAT-EXAMINER measures, we additionally assessed test-retest reliability and associations between baseline disease severity and changes in TabCAT-EXAMINER scores.

The TabCAT-EXAMINER score was normally distributed, demonstrated high test-retest reliability, and was associated in the expected directions with independent tests of executive functioning, demographics, disease severity, and diagnosis. Greater baseline disease severity was associated with more rapid longitudinal TabCAT-EXAMINER decline.

The TabCAT-EXAMINER is a tablet-based executive functioning battery developed for observational research and clinical trials. Performance can be summarized as a single composite score, and results of this study support its reliability and validity in cognitive aging and neurodegenerative disease cohorts.

Poor cardiovascular health occurs with age and is associated with increased dementia risk, yet its impact on frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease has not been well established. Examining cardiovascular risk in a population with high genetic vulnerability provides an opportunity to assess the impact of lifestyle factors on brain health outcomes. In the current study, we examined whether systemic vascular burden associates with accelerated cognitive and brain aging outcomes in genetic FTLD.

166 adults with autosomal dominant FTLD (C9orf72 n= 97; GRN n= 34; MAPT n= 35; 54% female; Mage = 47.9; Meducation = 15.6 years) enrolled in the Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Longitudinal FTD study (ALLFTD) were included. Participants completed neuroimaging and were screened for cardiovascular risk and functional impairment during a comprehensive neurobehavioral and medical interview. A vascular burden score (VBS) was created by summing vascular risk factors (VRS) [diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and sleep apnea] and vascular diseases (VDS) [cerebrovascular disease (e.g., TIA, CVA), cardiac arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation, pacemaker, defibrillator), coronary artery disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, cardiac bypass, stent), and congestive heart failure] following a previously developed composite (range 0 to 8). We examined the interaction between each vascular health metric (VBS, VDS, VRS) and age (vascular health*age) on clinical severity (CDR plus NACC FTLD-SB), and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume outcomes, adjusting for age and sex. Vascular risk, disease, and overall burden scores were examined in separate models.

There was a statistically significant interaction between total VBS and age on both clinical severity (ß=0.20, p=0.044) and WMH burden (ß=0.20, p=0.032). Mutation carriers with higher vascular burden evidenced worse clinical and WMH outcomes for their age. When breaking down the vascular burden score into (separate) vascular risk (VRS) and vascular disease (VDS) scores, the interaction between age and VRS remained significant only for WMH (ß=0.26, p=0.009), but not clinical severity (ß=0.04, p=0.685). On the other hand, the interaction between VDS and age remained significant only for clinical severity (ß=0.20, p=0.041) but not WMH (ß=0.17, p=0.066).

Our results demonstrate that systemic vascular burden is associated with an “accelerated aging” pattern on clinical and white matter outcomes in autosomal dominant FTLD. Specifically, mutation carriers with greater vascular burden show poorer neurobehavioral outcomes for their chronological age. When separating vascular risk from disease, risk was associated with higher age-related WMH burden, whereas disease was associated with poorer age-related clinical severity of mutation carriers. This pattern suggests preferential brain-related effects of vascular risk factors, while the functional impact of such factors may be more closely aligned with fulminant vascular disease. Our results suggest cardiovascular health may be an important, potentially modifiable risk factor to help mitigate the cognitive and behavioral disturbances associated with having a pathogenic variant of autosomal dominant FTLD. Future studies should continue to examine the neuropathological processes underlying the impact of cardiovascular risk in FTLD to inform more precise recommendations, particularly as it relates to lifestyle interventions.

Therapeutics targeting frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are entering clinical trials. There are challenges to conducting these studies, including the relative rarity of the disease. Remote assessment tools could increase access to clinical research and pave the way for decentralized clinical trials. We developed the ALLFTD Mobile App, a smartphone application that includes assessments of cognition, speech/language, and motor functioning. The objectives were to determine the feasibility and acceptability of collecting remote smartphone data in a multicenter FTD research study and evaluate the reliability and validity of the smartphone cognitive and motor measures.

A diagnostically mixed sample of 207 participants with FTD or from familial FTD kindreds (CDR®+NACC-FTLD=0 [n=91]; CDR®+NACC-FTLD=0.5 [n=39]; CDR®+NACC-FTLD>1 [n=39]; unknown [n=38]) were asked to remotely complete a battery of tests on their smartphones three times over two weeks. Measures included five executive functioning (EF) tests, an adaptive memory test, and participant experience surveys. A subset completed smartphone tests of balance at home (n=31) and a finger tapping test (FTT) in the clinic (n=11). We analyzed adherence (percentage of available measures that were completed) and user experience. We evaluated Spearman-Brown split-half reliability (100 iterations) using the first available assessment for each participant. We assessed test-retest reliability across all available assessments by estimating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). To investigate construct validity, we fit regression models testing the association of the smartphone measures with gold-standard neuropsychological outcomes (UDS3-EF composite [Staffaroni et al., 2021], CVLT3-Brief Form [CVLT3-BF] Immediate Recall, mechanical FTT), measures of disease severity (CDR®+NACC-FTLD Box Score & Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale [PSPRS]), and regional gray matter volumes (cognitive tests only).

Participants completed 70% of tasks. Most reported that the instructions were understandable (93%), considered the time commitment acceptable (97%), and were willing to complete additional assessments (98%). Split-half reliability was excellent for the executive functioning (r’s=0.93-0.99) and good for the memory test (r=0.78). Test-retest reliabilities ranged from acceptable to excellent for cognitive tasks (ICC: 0.70-0.96) and were excellent for the balance (ICC=0.97) and good for FTT (ICC=0.89). Smartphone EF measures were strongly associated with the UDS3-EF composite (ß's=0.6-0.8, all p<.001), and the memory test was strongly correlated with total immediate recall on the CVLT3-BF (ß=0.7, p<.001). Smartphone FTT was associated with mechanical FTT (ß=0.9, p=.02), and greater acceleration on the balance test was associated with more motor features (ß=0.6, p=0.02). Worse performance on all cognitive tests was associated with greater disease severity (ß's=0.5-0.7, all p<.001). Poorer performance on the smartphone EF tasks was associated with smaller frontoparietal/subcortical volume (ß's=0.4-0.6, all p<.015) and worse memory scores with smaller hippocampal volume (ß=0.5, p<.001).

These results suggest remote digital data collection of cognitive and motor functioning in FTD research is feasible and acceptable. These findings also support the reliability and validity of unsupervised ALLFTD Mobile App cognitive tests and provide preliminary support for the motor measures, although further study in larger samples is required.

A common assumption in clinical neuropsychology is that cerebrovascular risk is adversely associated with executive function, while Alzheimer’s disease (AD) primarily targets episodic memory. The goal of the present study was to determine the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of these assumptions using validated markers of cerebrovascular and AD burden.

19271 longitudinally-followed participants from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center (NACC) database (Mean age= 72.25; SD age= 10.42; 58% women; 51.6% CDR= 0, 33.7% CDR= 0.5, 14.7% CDR> 1) were included. Cognitive outcomes were a composite memory score and an executive function composite score (UDS3-EF; Staffaroni et al., 2020). Baseline presence of cerebrovascular disease was indexed by the presence of moderate to severe white matter hyperintensities or lacunar infarct on brain MRI (yes/no), while baseline AD pathology was indexed by the presence of a positive amyloid PET scan or elevated CSF AD biomarkers (yes/no). We used linear mixed effect models to assess the effects of baseline cerebrovascular disease, baseline AD pathology, and their interactions with time in study (years post baseline) controlling for baseline age, sex, education, and baseline MoCA score.

Baseline cerebrovascular disease was significantly associated with a lower intercept on executive functioning (between-person effect) (p < -0.001, 95% CI -0.37, -0.14) but not memory, while presence of AD biomarkers was associated with a lower memory intercept (p < -0.001, 95% CI -0.52, -0.39) but not executive function. However, only presence of AD pathology at baseline was associated with faster longitudinal decline on both memory and executive functioning over time. Baseline cerebrovascular disease did not independently relate to rate of cognitive decline.

Consistent with widely held assumptions, our between-person analyses showed that MRI evidence of cerebrovascular disease was associated with worse executive functioning but not memory, while biomarker evidence of AD pathology was associated with worse memory but not executive function. Longitudinally, however, AD is the primary driver of decline in both executive and memory function. These results extend our understanding of how pathology impacts cognition in aging cohorts and highlight the importance of using longitudinal models.

There are minimal data directly comparing plasma neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in aging and neurodegenerative disease research. We evaluated associations of plasma NfL and plasma GFAP with brain volume and cognition in two independent cohorts of older adults diagnosed as clinically normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or Alzheimer’s dementia.

We studied 121 total participants (Cohort 1: n = 50, age 71.6 ± 6.9 years, 78% CN, 22% MCI; Cohort 2: n = 71, age 72.2 ± 9.2 years, 45% CN, 25% MCI, 30% dementia). Gray and white matter volumes were obtained for total brain and broad subregions of interest (ROIs). Neuropsychological testing evaluated memory, executive functioning, language, and visuospatial abilities. Plasma samples were analyzed in duplicate for NfL and GFAP using single molecule array assays (Quanterix Simoa). Linear regression models with structural MRI and cognitive outcomes included plasma NfL and GFAP simultaneously along with relevant covariates.

Higher plasma GFAP was associated with lower white matter volume in both cohorts for temporal (Cohort 1: β = −0.33, p = .002; Cohort 2: β = −0.36, p = .03) and parietal ROIs (Cohort 1: β = −0.31, p = .01; Cohort 2: β = −0.35, p = .04). No consistent findings emerged for gray matter volumes. Higher plasma GFAP was associated with lower executive function scores (Cohort 1: β = −0.38, p = .01; Cohort 2: β = −0.36, p = .007). Plasma NfL was not associated with gray or white matter volumes, or cognition after adjusting for plasma GFAP.

Plasma GFAP may be more sensitive to white matter and cognitive changes than plasma NfL. Biomarkers reflecting astroglial pathophysiology may capture complex dynamics of aging and neurodegenerative disease.

The relationship between wisdom and fluid intelligence (Gf) is poorly understood, particularly in older adults. We empirically tested the magnitude of the correlation between wisdom and Gf to help determine the extent of overlap between these two constructs.

Cross-sectional study with preregistered hypotheses and well-powered analytic plan (https://osf.io/h3pjx).

Memory and Aging Center at the University of California San Francisco, located in the USA.

141 healthy older adults (mean age = 76 years; 56% female).

Wisdom was quantified using a well-validated self-report-based scale (San Diego Wisdom Scale or SD-WISE). Gf was assessed via composite measures of processing speed (Gf-PS) and executive functioning (Gf-EF). The relationships of SD-WISE scores to Gf-PS and Gf-EF were tested in bivariate correlational analyses and multiple regression models adjusted for demographics (age, sex, and education). Exploratory analyses evaluated the relationships between SD-WISE and age, episodic memory performance, and dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortical volumes on magnetic resonance imaging.

Wisdom showed a small, positive association with Gf-EF (r = 0.181 [95% CI 0.016, 0.336], p = .031), which was reduced to nonsignificance upon controlling for demographics, and no association with Gf-PS (r = 0.019 [95% CI −0.179, 0.216], p = .854). Wisdom demonstrated a small, negative correlation with age (r = −0.197 [95% CI −0.351, −0.033], p = .019), but was not significantly related to episodic memory or prefrontal volumes.

Our findings indicate that most of the variance in wisdom (>95%) is unaccounted for by Gf. The independence of wisdom from cognitive functions that reliably show age-associated declines suggests that it may hold unique potential to bolster decision-making, interpersonal functioning, and other everyday activities in older adults.

Clinically normal older adults (52–92 years old) were followed longitudinally for up to 8 years after completing a memory paradigm at baseline [Story Recall Test (SRT)] that assessed delayed recall at 30 min and 1 week. Subsets of the cohort underwent neuroimaging (N = 134, mean age = 75) and neuropsychological testing (N = 178–207, mean ages = 74–76) at annual study visits occurring approximately 15–18 months apart. Mixed-effects regression models evaluated if baseline SRT performance predicted longitudinal changes in gray matter volumes and cognitive composite scores, controlling for demographics.

Worse SRT 1-week recall was associated with more precipitous rates of longitudinal decline in medial temporal lobe volumes (p = .037), episodic memory (p = .003), and executive functioning (p = .011), but not occipital lobe or total gray matter volumes (demonstrating neuroanatomical specificity; p > .58). By contrast, SRT 30-min recall was only associated with longitudinal decline in executive functioning (p = .044).

Memory paradigms that capture longer-term recall may be particularly sensitive to age-related medial temporal lobe changes and neurodegenerative disease trajectories. (JINS, 2020, xx, xx-xx)