To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The original declarative procedural reflective (DPR) model is a well-established model of therapist knowledge and skill development. To date, although it has been used to guide reflection and discussion around personal and practitioner selves, it has not emphasised the various intersecting identities of practitioners and how these interact within wider concepts such as power, society, service contexts and the patient and supervisory relationships. The learning, development and implementation of CBT skills does not occur in a vacuum or separate to the practitioner identities however relatively little has been written on this. This paper aims to expand the original DPR model to illustrate potential ways that social context, identity and power could be considered within CBT training, delivery and supervision. It delineates and explores the additional components of the model (i.e. practitioner identity(s), context/society and power) and then provides examples of how this framework could inform key CBT activities (including low-intensity CBT).
Key learning aims
(1) We aim to (re-) familiarise the reader with the original DPR model of practitioner development and how this applies to CBT practitioners explicitly including low-intensity CBT practitioners (from novice learners through to expert).
(2) We aim to help the reader understand how the key elements of the original DPR model (declarative knowledge, procedural skills, reflective system and therapist stance) can be applied to specific content areas when working with individuals with minoritised identities.
(3) The reader will be introduced to an adapted DPR model which provides a framework for CBT practitioners to reflect on, and be able to conceptualise the influence of their own social identities, social context, power and how this may impact on their development and implementation of declarative knowledge, procedural skills and reflective skills.
(4) We aim to help the reader understand how an adapted DPR model can provide a helpful framework to guide skill development in working with difference and ensuring practitioners have the knowledge and skills required to provide sensitive and effective therapy, supervision and training to individuals with identities that may be different from the practitioner.
There has been limited consideration of the training and support needs of therapists from minoritised ethnic backgrounds. This study quantitatively evaluates a novel application of self-practice/self-reflection (SP/SR) to CBT therapists from minoritised ethnic backgrounds. The study aimed to explore the impact of the SP/SR programme on (1) therapists’ skills in working with ethnicity in their clinical practice; (2) their ethnic identity development; and (3) their perceived levels of personal and professional wellbeing, during the intervention and at follow-up. A multiple baseline single case experimental design was adopted. Measures were developed and adapted for this evaluation and weekly outcomes relating to therapist skill development, ethnic identity development, and personal and professional wellbeing were collected. The outcomes of six participants were analysed using visual and statistical analysis. The results indicated that the SP/SR programme significantly improved therapist skills in identifying and addressing similarities and differences in ethnicity within therapy during the intervention. Improvements were also seen across other skills, ethnic identity developmental and wellbeing outcomes between the baseline and SP/SR phases, with some participants showing significant improvements. Outcomes from the follow-up phase presented a more mixed picture. Therefore, the findings give some support for the SP/SR programme in developing therapist skills in working with ethnicity, as well as highlighting differential outcomes for participants related to their levels of experience and engagement. The findings may have possible implications for the personal and professional development of ethnically minoritised therapists, as well as future quantitative SP/SR research.
Key learning aims
(1) To provide an overview of self-practice/self-reflection (SP/SR) and its theoretical underpinnings.
(2) To summarise the current issues around the development of cultural competence, particularly for therapists from minoritised ethnic backgrounds.
(3) To introduce and describe a novel SP/SR programme for CBT therapists from minoritised ethnic backgrounds.
(4) To highlight the importance of considering ethnicity within clinical practice, both in terms of the provision of culturally competent therapy as well as to support the personal and professional development of therapists from minoritised ethnic backgrounds.
Older adults are under-represented in Talking Therapies (previously named IAPT) services in the UK, a national priority for improvement in the NHS. A Talking Therapies service in the south of England identified that many older adults who were referred did not opt-in to assessment. We aimed to explore the characteristics of these older adults and understand their experiences, to inform recommendations to support them to opt-in to the service in future. First, demographic and referral characteristics were compared for older adults who did and did not opt-in, to explore any that increased odds of not opting-in. Next, surveys and semi-structured interviews were used to investigate older adults’ reasons for not opting-in. Responses were thematically analysed, and themes were categorised using the COM-B model to inform theory-based recommendations. Older age, being from an ethnic minority group, having a previous referral, not being able to receive text messages, and not self-referring (e.g. being referred by GP) all significantly increased the chances of older adults not opting-in. Thematic analysis found that impersonal and confusing processes, as well as older adults’ limited knowledge of Talking Therapies, beliefs about therapy, and physical, cognitive and life changes with age were barriers to opting-in. Several recommendations are made, including ideas to increase accessibility of information, change procedures to improve personal connection, and explore and overcome practical barriers. Improving routine data and feedback collection from people who do not opt-in will be important to inform and evaluate improvements.
Key learning aims
(1) To recognise that the ongoing issue of under-representation of older adults within Talking Therapies extends beyond barriers to referral.
(2) To understand demographic and referral characteristics that may increase the likelihood of older adults not opting-in to a Talking Therapies service following referral.
(3) To understand the experiences of older adults who do not opt-in and the barriers they cite, exploring factors that impacted their capability, opportunity and motivation to opt-in.
(4) To consider how services could change their procedures, information sharing, and community outreach to better serve older adults.
Many white psychotherapists may lack the skills required to work effectively with service users from minoritised ethnicities. This article proposes that the nature of this skills deficit can be understood through applying the Declarative-Procedural-Reflective (DPR) model of therapist skill development. The DPR model has been used in a range of psychotherapeutic contexts, and it provides a systematic account of how therapists from all modalities develop and can improve their skills. Adapting this model to white therapists’ skills in working with service users from minoritised ethnicities allows the identification of specific areas of skills deficit, and therefore clear recommendations as to how to address those deficits. The application of the DPR model to this context suggests that there are clear areas of skills deficit in terms of knowledge base, the practical skills of carrying out therapy, and the ability of therapists to reflect on their work with service users from minoritised ethnicities. I conclude by making a number of suggestions as to how those deficits could be addressed, both by individual therapists and at a systemic level.
Key learning aims
(1) To explore why some white psychotherapists find it more difficult to work effectively with service users from minoritised ethnicities.
(2) To conceptualise difficulties in working with service users from minoritised ethnicities as an issue of clinical skill, knowledge and attitude development, where therapists’ skills can be improved if specific deficits are appropriately addressed.
(3) To use the structure of the DPR model to better understand how deficits in therapists’ skills, knowledge and reflective ability may have an impact on their work with service users from minoritised ethnicities. This allows the identification of specific areas of deficit, and therefore clear recommendations as to how to address those deficits.
(4) This is primarily addressed at CBT therapists, but the points raised in this article apply to all schools of therapy.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.