We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition of the importance of leadership skills to doctors. However, these skills are not usually formally taught or assessed. This study aims to evaluate the impact of using coaching as a novel technique to support Psychiatry trainees in developing leadership skills.
Methods
This poster summarises a primary research study which evaluated an educational intervention using a mixed-method approach.
All Higher Psychiatry Trainees at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trusts were given an opportunity to enrol on the Coaching for Consultant Psychiatrist Leadership Pilot Programme. Those who enrolled (coachees) were offered five 90-minute one-to-one sessions with Psychiatry consultants (coaches) who received training in Coaching for Leadership. Coachees completed a self-assessment questionnaire examining their views on their own leadership skills before and after completing the programme. Questions used were adopted from the High-Performance People Skills questionnaire (HPPS) – a tool used to collect 360° feedback as part of leadership training. Coachees and coaches also attended separate focus groups to discuss their subjective experiences of receiving and providing coaching. Thematic analysis was carried out.
Results
Eight coaches and seven coachees participated in the study. Most HPPS self-assessment scores post-intervention have increased after completion of the course. Overall coachees' satisfaction with their leadership skills increased from 3.4/5.0 to 4.0/5.0 after completing the programme.
Focus groups yielded rich qualitative data. The themes identified were: a broad range of reasons for Trainees and Consultants to join the programme, positive impact on coaches’ coaching skills, positive impact on coachees’ leadership skills and ideas on how to improve the programme to inform future curriculum design or improve implementation of any educational interventions.
Conclusion
Psychiatry Trainees’ self-perception of leadership skills can improve after receiving coaching. They find coaching helpful due to its individualised nature and the fact that it promotes the application of skills in real-life settings. Coaches also benefit by gaining new skills in coaching and leadership. Coachees and coaches share similar motivations for joining, including the desire to learn new skills, support others and be supported. More research is needed to evaluate the practical aspects of delivering coaching for leadership programmes as part of speciality training, but its potential is promising.
A number of community based surveys have identified an increase in psychological symptoms and distress but there has been no examination of symptoms at the more severe end of the mental health spectrum.
Aims
We aimed to analyse numbers and types of psychiatric presentations to inform planning for future demand on mental health services in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Method
We analysed electronic data between January and April 2020 for 2534 patients referred to acute psychiatric services, and tested for differences in patient demographics, symptom severity and use of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA), before and after lockdown. We used interrupted time-series analyses to compare trends in emergency department and psychiatric presentations until December 2020.
Results
There were 22% fewer psychiatric presentations the first week and 48% fewer emergency department presentations in the first month after lockdown initiated. A higher proportion of patients were detained under the MHA (22.2 v. 16.1%) and Mental Capacity Act 2005 (2.2 v. 1.1%) (χ2(2) = 16.3, P < 0.0001), and they experienced a longer duration of symptoms before seeking help from mental health services (χ2(3) = 18.6, P < 0.0001). A higher proportion of patients presented with psychotic symptoms (23.3 v. 17.0%) or delirium (7.0 v. 3.6%), and fewer had self-harm behaviour (43.8 v. 52.0%, χ2(7) = 28.7, P < 0.0001). A higher proportion were admitted to psychiatric in-patient units (22.2 v. 18.3%) (χ2(6) = 42.8, P < 0.0001) after lockdown.
Conclusions
UK lockdown resulted in fewer psychiatric presentations, but those who presented were more likely to have severe symptoms, be detained under the MHA and be admitted to hospital. Psychiatric services should ensure provision of care for these patients as well as planning for those affected by future COVID-19 waves.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.