We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Laparoscopic surgery is open surgery carried out through small incisions with enhanced magnification of the operative field. The advantages of a laparoscopic (or key hole) approach to the abdomen and pelvis have been well documented and include: a significant reduction in postoperative pain, length of stay, recovery time and adhesion formation. In children or adolescents this will result in a faster return to school and normal activities. Laparoscopic incisions are much smaller than a transverse incision and indeed a midline laparotomy. This reduction in wound visibility is especially important in children and adolescents who otherwise may be asked by contemporaries or a new partner about the reasons behind the scar. This will be especially distressing while coming to terms with the psychological impact of the diagnosis of an XY karyotype or an absent uterus.
The claimant presented with abdominal pain from the age of 18 years through to the age of 36 years. When she finally underwent a laparoscopy, she was found to have grade 4 endometriosis which had spread around her ovaries, colon and the wall of the abdomen. She underwent treatment, but as the endometriosis was so far advanced it could not be fully treated and it was alleged: i) it had been negligent to consider her symptoms to be related to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) alone; ii) there had been a failure to consider a diagnosis of endometriosis earlier; iii) there had been a failure to perform a laparoscopy earlier, even though her symptoms remained unchanged after treatment.
Gynaecological operative laparoscopy has progressed significantly over the past two decades. The process of laparoscopic surgery should be based on an appropriate risk management system that allows for improved quality of care. Regarding women with severe endometriosis, specialist referral centres should be developed. Units performing laparoscopic surgery should adopt recommendations and guidelines from scientific bodies (RCOG, NICE, BSGE) and should benchmark their audited activity against the national standards. The main components for consideration when developing models of service in laparoscopic surgery include: gynaecology outpatients, pre-operative preparation, operative and post-operative. Laparoscopic training can be developed and augmented with the use of simulators or laparoscopic trainers. Laparoscopic surgery necessitates a team approach between surgical, nursing and technical support staff. Audit of length of stay, analgesia requirement, complication rate and re-admission rate help to redesign and configure the service.
The first gynaecological reports for laparoscopy came from Hope in 1937 (Hope, 1937) on the diagnosis of extrauterine pregnancy but it was not until the 1970s that laparoscopic surgery started to become established (Semm, 1970). The introduction of good-resolution camera systems and the development of new surgical instruments have enabled the advancement of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, advances in technology have increased the safety parameters and enabled surgery to be performed more efficiently. These technological developments include the expansion of bipolar technology and the introduction of laser modalities, the harmonic scalpel and haemostatic stapling devices.
Originally laparoscopic surgery was referred to as minimally invasive surgery but it soon became apparent that the surgery was highly invasive but performed through small incisions, and hence the term minimal access surgery was coined. Minimal access surgery can be considered as an alternative procedure to the traditional operation; it aims to achieve the same end result as the traditional operation but is performed through small incisions. In hysteroscopic surgery, most laparoscopic procedures should aim to emulate the open operation, the only difference being the size of the incision. However, there may be modifications in the minimal access route as a result of the improved vision that it affords or the difficulty in emulating the open procedure. The perceived disadvantages of the laparoscopic route over the open route are the potential complications, the time to perform the operation and the cost.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.