Cerebral microbleeds are associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) following acute ischemic stroke. We investigated whether the effect of dabigatran (vs. aspirin) in patients with acute minor non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) is modified by baseline microbleeds on MRI.

The Dabigatran Treatment of Acute Stroke II trial randomized 305 patients with acute minor non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke/TIA to dabigatran (150/110 mg twice daily) or aspirin (81 mg daily) for 30 days. Microbleeds were centrally adjudicated in patients with an interpretable blood-sensitive sequence on baseline MRI. In this post hoc analysis, we used multivariable regression models to determine the association between microbleeds and any incident HT on day-30 MRI and excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale = 0–1) at 90 days.

A total of 251 (82.3%) participants (mean age = 66 ± 13 years, 36% women, median [IQR] onset-to-randomization time = 40[27–55] hours; median [IQR] NIHSS = 1 [0–2]) were included, of whom 82 (33%) had microbleeds. On day-30 MRI, 6% (n = 14) developed HT, and 80% (n = 191) achieved 90-day mRS of 0–1. We found no association between microbleed presence and HT (adjusted OR = 0.84; 95%CI:0.21–3.25) or excellent functional outcome (adjusted RR = 1.09; 95%CI:0.94–1.26). The rate of HT in patients with microbleeds was 3% with dabigatran and 4% with aspirin (OR = 0.85; 95%CI:0.11–6.75). Excellent functional outcome occurred in 74% and 84% of dabigatran and aspirin-treated patients, respectively (RR = 0.88; 95%CI:0.69–1.12). The presence, severity or location of microbleeds did not modify the effect of dabigatran on these outcomes (p-interaction > 0.05).

Early dabigatran treatment appears safe in patients with acute minor non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke/TIA and hemorrhage-prone cerebral small vessel disease marked by microbleeds on MRI.

It is unknown if the COVID-19 pandemic and public health measures had an immediate impact on stroke subtypes and etiologies in patients not infected with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate if the proportion of non-COVID-19-related stroke subtypes (ischemic vs. hemorrhagic) and etiologies (cardioembolic, atherosclerosis, small vessel disease, and others) during the pandemic’s first wave were different from prepandemic.

For this retrospective cohort study, we included patients without COVID-19 with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at two large Canadian stroke centers between March–May 2019 (prepandemic cohort) and March–May 2020 (pandemic cohort). Proportions of stroke subtypes and etiologies were compared between cohorts using chi-square tests.

The prepandemic cohort consisted of 234 stroke patients and the pandemic cohort of 207 stroke patients. There were no major differences in baseline characteristics. The proportions of ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke were similar (ischemic stroke: 77% prepandemic vs. 75% pandemic; hemorrhagic stroke:12% prepandemic vs. 14% pandemic; p > 0.05). There were no differences in etiologies, except for a decreased proportion of ischemic stroke due to atherosclerosis in the pandemic cohort (26% prepandemic vs. 15% pandemic; difference: 10.6%, 95%CI: 1.4-19.7; p = 0.03). Notably, during the pandemic, the cause of ischemic stroke was more often unknown because of incomplete work-up (13.3% prepandemic vs. 28.2% pandemic, difference: 14.9%, 95%-CI: 5.7–24.2; p = <0.01).

In this study, the pandemic had no clear effect on stroke subtypes and etiologies suggesting a limited impact of the pandemic on stroke triggers. However, the shift from atherosclerosis toward other causes warrants further exploration.

We investigated the impact of regionally imposed social and healthcare restrictions due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to the time metrics in the management of acute ischemic stroke patients admitted at the regional stroke referral site for Central South Ontario, Canada.

We compared relevant time metrics between patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and/or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) before and after the declared restrictions and state of emergency imposed in our region (March 17, 2020).

We identified a significant increase in the median door-to-CT times for patients receiving intravenous tPA (19 min, interquartile range (IQR): 14–27 min vs. 13 min, IQR: 9–17 min, p = 0.008) and/or EVT (20 min, IQR: 15–33 min vs. 11 min, IQR: 5–20 min, p = 0.035) after the start of social and healthcare restrictions in our region compared to the previous 12 months. For patients receiving intravenous tPA treatment, we also found a significant increase (p = 0.005) in the median door-to-needle time (61 min, IQR: 46–72 min vs. 37 min, IQR: 30–50 min). No delays in the time from symptom onset to hospital presentation were uncovered for patients receiving tPA and/or endovascular reperfusion treatments in the first 1.5 months after the establishment of regional and institutional restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We detected an increase in our institutional time to treatment metrics for acute ischemic stroke patients receiving tPA and/or endovascular reperfusion therapies, related to delays from hospital presentation to the acquisition of cranial CT imaging for both tPA- and EVT-treated patients, and an added delay to treatment with tPA.