Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

9 results

  • 8 - On Rawls and Political Liberalism

  • Edited by Samuel Freeman, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Companion to Rawls
    Published online:
    28 May 2006
    Print publication:
    04 November 2002, pp 316-346

  • Summary

    I spoke here approximately five years ago. Then I spoke on Frege and Wittgenstein, [and] so I thought I would continue the series by now talking about Rawls. Some might think there is no connection between Frege and Wittgenstein, on [the] one hand, and Rawls, on the other. For me there is a very close connection, and I hope to bring it out implicitly if not explicitly today.

    Everyone knows that in 1971 John Rawls published A Theory of Justice, which is very widely considered the most important work in political philosophy and perhaps even in moral philosophy since the end of World War II, and many think the most important work in political philosophy since the writings of John Stuart Mill. But what is not so widely known is that in 1993 Rawls brought out a second book, Political Liberalism, which a few of us believe is even more important. This book did not receive much praise upon coming out and has had [much less] attention paid to it. That I should like to change. (As I told Rawls yesterday afternoon just before I came out here, I view myself as an apostle going west.)

  • A supplement to Herbrand

  • Burton Dreben, John Denton
  • Journal:
    The Journal of Symbolic Logic / Volume 31 / Issue 3 / 02 September 1966
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    12 March 2014, pp. 393-398
    Print publication:
    02 September 1966

  • In [5] it was shown that to complete Herbrand's argument for his Fundamental Theorem (see [6]) a weak analyzing function for certain applications of the rules of passage is needed. The following theorem describes such a function. (We use the terminology and notation of [5] except that, for each schema S and each p ≧ 1, we shall write D(S,p) rather than DSp for the domain of order p generated by S. In addition, we shall say that an element of D(S, p) is of order k, 1 ≦ k ≦ p, if it belongs to D(S, k) but not to D(S,k—1).)