We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
As opposed to the simplistic promotion of one given technique or device, the multimodal airway management relies on the recognition that each individual approach may fail, that the maintenance of oxygenation during the procedure is a key point, that the prerequisites to the practical step of placing a tube in the trachea involve the knowledge of intelligent and intelligible algorithms and the previous acquisition of skills, with understanding of their foundations. An example of the ‘combination techniques’ using the specific advantages of one medical device to mitigate the limitations of another is the use of a videolaryngoscope to facilitate intubation with a flexible optical bronchoscope, which increases the ease and the success of the process during the clinical as well as the training phases. Other multimodal approaches such as the combination of bronchoscopy with the use of a supraglottic airway or with high flow nasal oxygen optimise the safety of the procedure by maintaining the delivery of oxygen. The multimodal approach is particularly useful for the anaesthesiologist and intensivist only occasionally exposed to the management of difficult airway situations. It improves high quality care of patients, education and training.
Failure to properly assess and identify possible difficulties with airway management and incorporate these findings to airway management strategies can lead to a poor clinical outcome. A thorough patient history review and physical examination, including bedside airway assessment, often reveal either congenital or acquired clinical conditions that may affect airway management. Ultrasound, radiographic studies and bedside flexible endoscopy for airway assessment are often necessary to understand the mechanism of pathophysiology of the lower airway. The advancement of technology, such as three-dimensional imaging, cone-beam computer tomography and virtual endoscopy, etc., is resulting in the emergence of potential future airway assessment tools. However, the ideal assessment tool for difficult airway management does not exist and unanticipated difficulties often occur. Using multiple tests to predict difficulty in airway management is better than any single test used in isolation. In addition, adverse human factors can significantly impact airway management. The importance of incorporating cognitive aids in our routine practice cannot be underestimated. Airway assessment forms the first part of any airway management strategy, including the use of certain medications and airway techniques. As practitioners, we must rise to the occasion and perform best clinical practice; there can no longer be a disconnect in what we know and what we do. We need to be the strong link in the chain in providing safe and quality care for our patients.
The incidence of difficult airway is higher in patients undergoing ENT surgery and, specifically, in patients undergoing ENT cancer surgery. Even the process of topicalization with local anesthetic can precipitate loss of the airway, as can some of the complications associated with awake intubation (e.g. airway bleeding and laryngospasm). The preoperative interview should also address the possibility of events having occurred since the last anesthetic such as weight gain, laryngeal stenosis from previous airway intervention, airway radiation, facial cosmetic surgery, and worsening temporomandibular joint disorder or rheumatoid arthritis. Prior to awake intubation, premedication is commonly used to reduce secretions, enable adequate topicalization of the airway, reduce the risk of epistaxis, and protect against the risk of aspiration. Depending on the clinical circumstance, intravenous sedation may be useful in allowing the patient to tolerate awake intubation by providing anxiolysis, amnesia, and analgesia.