We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
INTRODUCTION
Great apes and humans are the largest-brained primates. Aside from a few extinct subfossil lemurs, they are also the largest in body mass. Body size is a key aspect of a species' biology, a large organism having different energetic, ecological, and physical constraints than a small one. Brain size, in so far as it determines abilities to acquire, process, and act on information, is also a key aspect of a species' biology and is linked to body size. Large animals have different informational problems to solve than do small ones, hence their respective sensory organs and nervous systems are sized and organized differently.
Mammalian body and brain size scale consistently with each other (Figure 18.1). This relation is generally described by allometric exponents that vary between 2/3 and 3/4 (e.g., Bauchot & Stephan 1966, 1969; Hofman 1982; Jerison 1973; Lande 1979; Martin 1981; Martin & Harvey 1985; Stephan 1972). From a paleontological perspective, the body–brain size relation offers an appealing way to evaluate the cognitive abilities of fossil taxa, a problem of particular importance for understanding hominid evolution.
A convincing theoretical basis for this general allometric statistical pattern, however, remains elusive (Deacon 1997; Harvey & Krebs 1990). Body mass is not a strict determinant of brain size, as species of similar size can have different brain sizes and cognitive abilities (Pagel & Harvey 1989).
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.