Infection with Sars-CoV-2 is known to cause cardiac injury and coronary artery changes in moderate to severe acute COVID-19 and post-acute multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). However, little is known about the potential for cardiac involvement, in particular coronary artery dilation, in asymptomatic or mild cases of COVID-19.

A retrospective review of children ≤ 18 years of age with a history of asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 disease who underwent echocardiography after Sars-CoV-2 infection is conducted. Patients were excluded if they had been hospitalised for COVID-19/MIS-C or had a history of cardiac disease that could affect coronary artery dimension. Coronary artery dilation was defined as the Boston Z-score greater than 2.0.

One hundred and fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 9.4 years (+/– 5.4 years). Eighty-four (54%) patients were identified as having COVID-19 through positive antibody testing. All patients underwent electrocardiogram and echocardiogram as part of their cardiology evaluation. One hundred and thirty-five (86%) patients had a normal evaluation or only a minor variant on electrocardiogram, while 22 patients had abnormalities on echocardiogram, 4 of which demonstrated coronary artery dilation based on the Boston Z-score.

Much of the literature for post-infectious screening and follow-up focuses on patients with a history of moderate to severe COVID-19 disease, emphasising the need for surveillance for the potential development of myocarditis. In this study, 4 out of 157 (2.5%) children with a history of asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 disease without MIS-C were found to have some degree of coronary artery dilation. The significance of this finding currently remains unknown.

In January of 2010, North Carolina (NC) USA implemented state-wide Trauma Triage Destination Plans (TTDPs) to provide standardized guidelines for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) decision making. No study exists to evaluate whether triage behavior has changed for geriatric trauma patients.

The impact of the NC TTDPs was investigated on EMS triage of geriatric trauma patients meeting physiologic criteria of serious injury, primarily based on whether these patients were transported to a trauma center.

This is a retrospective cohort study of geriatric trauma patients transported by EMS from March 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 (pre-TTDP) and March 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 (post-TTDP) meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) age 50 years or older; (2) transported to a hospital by NC EMS; (3) experienced an injury; and (4) meeting one or more of the NC TTDP’s physiologic criteria for trauma (n = 5,345). Data were obtained from the Prehospital Medical Information System (PreMIS). Data collected included proportions of patients transported to a trauma center categorized by specific physiologic criteria, age category, and distance from a trauma center.

The proportion of patients transported to a trauma center pre-TTDP (24.4% [95% CI 22.7%-26.1%]; n = 604) was similar to the proportion post-TTDP (24.4% [95% CI 22.9%-26.0%]; n = 700). For patients meeting specific physiologic triage criteria, the proportions of patients transported to a trauma center were also similar pre- and post-TTDP: systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (22.5% versus 23.5%); respiratory rate <10 or >29 (23.2% versus 22.6%); and Glascow Coma Scale (GCS) score <13 (26.0% versus 26.4%). Patients aged 80 years or older were less likely to be transported to a trauma center than younger patients in both the pre- and post-TTDP periods.

State-wide implementation of a TTDP had no discernible effect on the proportion of patients 50 years and older transported to a trauma center. Under-triage remained common and became increasingly prevalent among the oldest adults. Research to understand the uptake of guidelines and protocols into EMS practice is critical to improving care for older adults in the prehospital environment.