Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

3333 results

Page 1 of 167

  • Troodontid specimens from the Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation of Montana (USA) and the validity of Troodon formosus

  • David J. Varricchio, Jason D. Hogan, Jacob D. Gardner
  • Journal:
    Journal of Paleontology , First View
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    13 May 2025, pp. 1-22
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • In 1855, Ferdinand Hayden collected a single tooth from the Judith River badlands of central Montana. Joseph Leidy named this specimen the following year as Troodon formosus. We describe troodontid material from the coeval Two Medicine Formation of Montana that compares closely to the recently resurrected and previously synonymized Stenonychosaurus inequalis from the lower Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta. We uphold that synonymy but recognize T. formosus as the senior synonym. Troodon formosus is distinguished from other troodontids by a maxilla with an anteriorly more broadly rounded maxillary fenestra, low-angled nasal process with stepped anterior portion, large palatal shelf, and 23 teeth; more pronounced basioccipital tubera; L-shaped to triangular frontal; and relatively shorter metatarsal III with convex to flat anterior face at maximum breadth. Phylogenetic analysis places T. formosus within the Troodontinae, a clade with poor within-group resolution. The T. formosus holotype was diagnostic at time of description. Despite numerous complications over the taxon’s long history, the original name of 1856 has come to encompass a robust and specific species concept despite originally fragmentary material. Troodon formosus best satisfies the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature’s tenants of priority and stability. Recent proposals to re-establish Stenonychosaurus inequalis as the proper name encounter an equally problematic and undiagnostic type specimen. Instead of either of these types, we propose that material from the Two Medicine Formation (Museum of the Rockies, MOR 553) would best serve as a neotype for Troodon formosus.

  • Exchange on David Laitin’s Identity in Formation

  • David D. Laitin, Pål Kolstø, Harris Mylonas
  • Journal:
    Nationalities Papers , FirstView
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    06 May 2025, pp. 1-18
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • In 2018, David Laitin and Pål Kolstø engaged in a discussion at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Nationalities held at Columbia University, New York. The panel was a 20-year retrospective on Identity in Formation: the Russian-speaking populations in the Near Abroad (Laitin 1998).

Page 1 of 167