We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The shallow-water equations are widely used to model interactions between horizontal shear flows and (rotating) gravity waves in thin planetary atmospheres. Their extension to allow for interactions with magnetic fields – the equations of shallow-water magnetohydrodynamics (SWMHD) – is often used to model waves and instabilities in thin stratified layers in stellar and planetary atmospheres, in the perfectly conducting limit. Here we consider how magnetic diffusion should be added to the equations of SWMHD. This is crucial for an accurate balance between advection and diffusion in the induction equation, and hence for modelling instabilities and turbulence. For the straightforward choice of Laplacian diffusion, we explain how fundamental mathematical and physical inconsistencies arise in the equations of SWMHD, and show that unphysical dynamo action can result. We then derive a physically consistent magnetic diffusion term by performing an asymptotic analysis of the three-dimensional equations of magnetohydrodynamics in the thin-layer limit, giving the resulting diffusion term explicitly in both planar and spherical coordinates. We show how this magnetic diffusion term, which allows for a horizontally varying diffusivity, is consistent with the standard shallow-water solenoidal constraint, and leads to negative semidefinite Ohmic dissipation. We also establish a basic type of antidynamo theorem.
While cognitive impairment is a core feature of psychosis, significant heterogeneity in cognitive and clinical outcomes is observed.
Aims
The aim of this study was to identify cognitive and clinical subgroups in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and determine if these profiles were linked to functional outcomes over time.
Method
A total of 323 individuals with FEP were included. Two-step hierarchical and k-means cluster analyses were performed using baseline cognitive and clinical variables. General linear mixed models were used to investigate whether baseline cognitive and clinical clusters were associated with functioning at follow-up time points (6–9, 12 and 15 months).
Results
Three distinct cognitive clusters were identified: a cognitively intact group (N = 59), a moderately impaired group (N= 77) and a more severely impaired group (N= 122). Three distinct clinical clusters were identified: a subgroup characterised by predominant mood symptoms (N = 76), a subgroup characterised by predominant negative symptoms (N= 19) and a subgroup characterised by overall mild symptom severity (N = 94). The subgroup with more severely impaired cognition also had more severe negative symptoms at baseline. Cognitive clusters were significantly associated with later social and occupational function, and associated with changes over time. Clinical clusters were associated with later social functioning but not occupational functioning, and were not associated with changes over time.
Conclusions
Baseline cognitive impairments are predictive of both later social and occupational function and change over time. This suggests that cognitive profiles offer valuable information in terms of prognosis and treatment needs.
Cremated bones are a commonly preserved material and often found in burial environments where unburned bone may not be preserved. As such direct radiocarbon dating of cremated bone could be essential in determining the chronology of an event. Pretreatment of cremated bone exploits the structural carbonate component of the bone which survives cremation. However, due to the low abundance (ca. 0.1%) of this component, the extraction of an amount of endogenous carbon sufficient for radiocarbon dating may represent a challenge. Here we investigate two modifications to the phosphoric acid digestion protocol used during the preparation of cremated bones at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). The first of these was to use ultrasonication to release evolved CO2 from the viscous phosphoric acid and cremated bone mixture that is formed during digestion. The second was to double the amount of time during which evolved CO2 was removed from the reaction vessel by transfer into a cryogenically cooled ampoule. Ultrasonication of the digestion mixture failed to produce a significantly higher carbon yield, while double-time collection resulted in an average 21.5±13.8% increase of C yield without affecting the measured age. Extending the collection time can better enable reliable dating of small (less than 1 g) samples.
The primary task of electrostatics is to find the electric field of a given stationary charge distribution. In principle, this purpose is accomplished by Coulomb’s law, in the form of Eq. 2.8:
The fundamental problem electrodynamics hopes to solve is this (Fig. 2.1): We have some electric charges, (call them source charges); what force do they exert on another charge, (call it the test charge)? The positions of the source charges are given (as functions of time); the trajectory of the test particle is to be calculated.
Remember the basic problem of classical electrodynamics: we have a collection of charges (the “source” charges), and we want to calculate the force they exert on some other charge (the “test” charge – Fig. 2.1). According to the principle of superposition, it is sufficient to find the force of a single source charge – the total is then the vector sum of all the individual forces.
If you ask the average person what “magnetism” is, you will probably be told about refrigerator decorations, compass needles, and the North Pole – none of which has any obvious connection with moving charges or current-carrying wires. And yet, in classical electrodynamics all magnetic phenomena are due to electric charges in motion; if you could examine a piece of magnetic material on an atomic scale you would find tiny currents: electrons orbiting around nuclei and spinning about their axes.
In this chapter we study conservation of energy, momentum, and angular momentum, in electrodynamics. But I want to begin by reviewing the conservation of charge, because it is the paradigm for all conservation laws. What precisely does conservation of charge tell us? That the total charge in the Universe is constant? Well, sure – that’s global conservation of charge. But local conservation of charge is a much stronger statement: if the charge in some region changes, then exactly that amount of charge must have passed in or out through the surface. The tiger can’t simply rematerialize outside the cage; if it got from inside to outside it must have slipped through a hole in the fence.
What is a “wave”? I don’t think I can give you an entirely satisfactory answer – the concept is intrinsically somewhat vague – but here’s a start: A wave is a disturbance of a continuous medium that propagates with a fixed shape at constant velocity. Immediately I must add qualifiers: in the presence of absorption, the wave will diminish in size as it moves; if the medium is dispersive, different frequencies travel at different speeds; in two or three dimensions, as the wave spreads out, its amplitude will decrease; and of course standing waves don’t propagate at all. But these are refinements; let’s start with the simple case: fixed shape, constant speed, one dimension (Fig. 9.1).
If you walk 4 miles due north and then 3 miles due east (Fig. 1.1), you will have gone a total of 7 miles, but you’re not 7 miles from where you set out – only 5. We need an arithmetic to describe quantities like this, which evidently do not add in the ordinary way. The reason they don’t, of course, is that displacements (straight line segments going from one point to another) have direction as well as magnitude (length), and it is essential to take both into account when you combine them.
In this chapter, we shall study electric fields in matter. Matter, of course, comes in many varieties – solids, liquids, gases, metals, woods, glasses – and these substances do not all respond in the same way to electrostatic fields. Nevertheless, most everyday objects belong (at least, in good approximation) to one of two large classes: conductors and insulators (or dielectrics).