Emerging evidence suggests that an impaired foetal environment—defined as maternal factors such as hypertensive disorders and diabetes—might contribute to outcomes in neonates with CHD. With this multicentre study, we prospectively collected data regarding impaired foetal environment to assess the impact on mortality in two ventricle and single ventricle neonates with CHD.

A module of prospectively collected maternal-foetal environment data was linked to established Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium data from June 2019 to July 2020. All neonates undergoing cardiothoracic surgery were included in this study. The outcome was in-hospital mortality. The primary predictor was the degree of impaired foetal environment defined as none, mild, or significant based on the presence of maternal hypertensive and glucose homeostasis disorders.

There were a total of 1913 neonates included in this study from 26 different centres. 218 patients had at least 1 missing impaired foetal environment data field (11.8%). Impaired foetal environment was not associated with increased mortality; however, there was a strong trend in the preterm single ventricular population.

While the overall cohort did not demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between impaired foetal environment and mortality, a notable trend emerged among preterm infants with single-ventricle physiology, suggesting increased mortality associated with more severe impaired foetal environment. The absence of statistical significance in this subgroup is likely attributable to the limited sample size and the substantial proportion of missing data highlighting the challenges of the mother-baby dyad in data collections.

Patients with CHD are at risk for developing necrotising enterocolitis. Currently, no standardised approaches for identification, diagnosis, and treatment of necrotising enterocolitis exists, and there are varying rates and management strategies of necrotising enterocolitis across centres. We used the Paediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium to identify high- and low-performing centres based on necrotising enterocolitis rates and convened a necrotising enterocolitis working group. The aims of the group were to understand why variability exists, identify risk factors, and create a foundation for a prospective improvement project.

Nine centres participated, and collaborative learning sessions were held with multidisciplinary input. REDCap surveys were disseminated to centres to create consensus among site practices and recommendations.

The following topics were discussed: diagnosis, risk factors, and management. Diagnosis consensus suggests (1) Diagnosis would benefit from a comprehensive scoring tool, and (2) ultrasound may serve as a highly sensitive diagnostic tool for those at high risk with the absence of other radiologic findings of necrotising enterocolitis. Risk factor consensus suggests (1) those with ductal-dependent systemic blood flow are the highest risk, and (2) vasopressors with splanchnic constriction should be used with caution. Management consensus suggests (1) breastmilk be used first-line for feeding, 2) resume feeds 24–48 hours after a necrotising enterocolitis rule-out, and 3) surgical deference to physical examination and laboratory evaluation above radiographic findings.

Variability exists in diagnosing necrotising enterocolitis and feeding approaches for at-risk patients. Opportunities exist for collaboration to standardise definitions, compare outcomes, identify risk factors, and create consensus on the management of necrotising enterocolitis.

There is wide variation in institutional sedation strategies in paediatric cardiac ICU. Validated tools such as State Behavioral Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale were created to help standardise sedation practices.

This is a multi-phase, multicentre, prospective project with the goal of optimising safety and comfort for paediatric cardiac ICU patients. Phase one consisted of an educational intervention with a self-paced, web-based video module on optimal sedation practices using validated sedation screening tools. Participant knowledge was assessed via a de-identified, unmatched pre- and post-test survey. Survey scores were reported as an aggregate average score and compared using a t-test.

There were 259 pre-tests, and 142 post-tests collected during the video-assisted educational intervention. There was a significant increase in mean score on the post-test compared to the pre-test for both instruments: from 4 to 4.8/10 for State Behavioral Scale (p = 0.01) and from 4.5 to 4.9 for Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (p = 0.04). 81% of respondents who completed the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale post-test and 88.1% of those who completed the State Behavioral Scale post-test said their practice would change based on the new knowledge acquired.

We report that our newly developed learning module intervention was effective in increasing short-term knowledge about optimal sedation and sedation scoring. Ongoing phase two efforts include evaluation of long-term compliance of validated sedation screening tools and developing an objective score to measure individual cumulative opioid dosing in the cardiac critical care unit.

A standardised multi-site approach to manage paediatric post-operative chylothorax does not exist and leads to unnecessary practice variation. The Chylothorax Work Group utilised the Pediatric Critical Care Consortium infrastructure to address this gap.

Over 60 multi-disciplinary providers representing 22 centres convened virtually as a quality initiative to develop an algorithm to manage paediatric post-operative chylothorax. Agreement was objectively quantified for each recommendation in the algorithm by utilising an anonymous survey. “Consensus” was defined as ≥ 80% of responses as “agree” or “strongly agree” to a recommendation. In order to determine if the algorithm recommendations would be correctly interpreted in the clinical environment, we developed ex vivo simulations and surveyed patients who developed the algorithm and patients who did not.

The algorithm is intended for all children (<18 years of age) within 30 days of cardiac surgery. It contains rationale for 11 central chylothorax management recommendations; diagnostic criteria and evaluation, trial of fat-modified diet, stratification by volume of daily output, timing of first-line medical therapy for “low” and “high” volume patients, and timing and duration of fat-modified diet. All recommendations achieved “consensus” (agreement >80%) by the workgroup (range 81–100%). Ex vivo simulations demonstrated good understanding by developers (range 94–100%) and non-developers (73%–100%).

The quality improvement effort represents the first multi-site algorithm for the management of paediatric post-operative chylothorax. The algorithm includes transparent and objective measures of agreement and understanding. Agreement to the algorithm recommendations was >80%, and overall understanding was 94%.