To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Primary care practice-based research is well positioned to address clinically relevant research questions that can inform real-world practice. However, many practices lack the infrastructure or readiness to participate in research. This study developed and evaluated the Practice Assessment for Research Readiness (PAR2), a survey tool designed to assess research readiness in healthcare systems and community-based primary care practices, including family medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine.
Methods:
The PAR2 survey was developed through partner engagement, adapting prior organizational survey questions, and pilot testing. Six Subscales included: Perceived Value of Research, Capacity for Change, Change Commitment, Change Efficacy, Task Knowledge, and Resource Availability. Cronbach’s alphas and composite reliabilities were calculated to assess internal consistency reliability of each subscale. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity.
Results:
A total of 249 participants from 50 primary care practices completed the PAR2 survey. The internal consistency reliability of each subscale was high (alpha and CR >0.7) except for the Capacity for Change subscale (CR = 0.77 but alpha = 0.69), which improved (alpha and CR = 0.82) after removing one question due to its low item-total correlation. The scales also showed good structural validity after minor modifications.
Conclusions:
The PAR2 survey provides a practice-level research specific measure that can be used to align practices with studies suited to their readiness, potentially improving recruitment, reducing attrition and guiding capacity-building interventions.
To examine the use of vitamin D supplements during infancy among the participants in an international infant feeding trial.
Design
Longitudinal study.
Setting
Information about vitamin D supplementation was collected through a validated FFQ at the age of 2 weeks and monthly between the ages of 1 month and 6 months.
Subjects
Infants (n 2159) with a biological family member affected by type 1 diabetes and with increased human leucocyte antigen-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes from twelve European countries, the USA, Canada and Australia.
Results
Daily use of vitamin D supplements was common during the first 6 months of life in Northern and Central Europe (>80 % of the infants), with somewhat lower rates observed in Southern Europe (>60 %). In Canada, vitamin D supplementation was more common among exclusively breast-fed than other infants (e.g. 71 % v. 44 % at 6 months of age). Less than 2 % of infants in the USA and Australia received any vitamin D supplementation. Higher gestational age, older maternal age and longer maternal education were study-wide associated with greater use of vitamin D supplements.
Conclusions
Most of the infants received vitamin D supplements during the first 6 months of life in the European countries, whereas in Canada only half and in the USA and Australia very few were given supplementation.
Following a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) there is a complex presentation of psychological symptoms which may impact on recovery. Validated treatments addressing these symptoms for this group of people are limited. This article reports on the protocol for a single-centre, two-armed, Phase II Randomised Control Trial (RCT) to address the adjustment process following a severe TBI. Participants will be recruited from Liverpool Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit and randomly allocated to one of two groups, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) or an active control (Befriending). The active treatment group utilises the six core processes of ACT with the intention of increasing participation and psychological flexibility and reducing psychological distress. A number of primary and secondary outcome measures, administered at assessment, post-treatment and 1-month follow-up, will be used to assess clinical outcomes. The publication of the protocol before the trial results are available addresses fidelity criterion (intervention design) for RCTs. This ensures transparency in the RCT and that it meets the guidelines according to the CONSORT statement. The protocol has also been registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000851066.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.