Childhood bullying is a public health priority. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of KiVa, a whole-school anti-bullying program that targets the peer context.

A two-arm pragmatic multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded economic evaluation. Schools were randomized to KiVa-intervention or usual practice (UP), stratified on school size and Free School Meals eligibility. KiVa was delivered by trained teachers across one school year. Follow-up was at 12 months post randomization. Primary outcome: student-reported bullying-victimization; secondary outcomes: self-reported bullying-perpetration, participant roles in bullying, empathy and teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Outcomes were analyzed using multilevel linear and logistic regression models.

Between 8/11/2019–12/02/2021, 118 primary schools were recruited in four trial sites, 11 111 students in primary analysis (KiVa-intervention: n = 5944; 49.6% female; UP: n = 5167, 49.0% female). At baseline, 21.6% of students reported being bullied in the UP group and 20.3% in the KiVa-intervention group, reducing to 20.7% in the UP group and 17.7% in the KiVa-intervention group at follow-up (odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.97, p value = 0.009). Students in the KiVa group had significantly higher empathy and reduced peer problems. We found no differences in bullying perpetration, school wellbeing, emotional or behavioral problems. A priori subgroup analyses revealed no differences in effectiveness by socioeconomic gradient, or by gender. KiVa costs £20.78 more per pupil than usual practice in the first year, and £1.65 more per pupil in subsequent years.

The KiVa anti-bullying program is effective at reducing bullying victimization with small-moderate effects of public health importance.

The study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research program (17-92-11). Intervention costs were funded by the Rayne Foundation, GwE North Wales Regional School Improvement Service, Children's Services, Devon County Council and HSBC Global Services (UK) Ltd.

Serious incident management and organisational learning are international patient safety priorities. Little is known about the quality of suicide investigations and, in turn, the potential for organisational learning. Suicide risk assessment is acknowledged as a complex phenomenon, particularly in the context of adult community mental health services. Root cause analysis (RCA) is the dominant investigative approach, although the evidence base underpinning RCA is contested, with little attention paid to the patient in context and their cumulative risk over time.

Recent literature proposes a Safety-II approach in response to the limitations of RCA. The importance of applying these approaches within a mental healthcare system that advocates a zero suicide framework, grounded in a restorative just culture, is highlighted.

Although integrative reviews and syntheses have clear methodological limitations, this approach facilitates the management of a disparate body of work to advance a critical understanding of patient safety in adult community mental healthcare.

In Australia, aeromedical retrieval provides a vital link for rural communities with limited health services to definitive care in urban centers. Yet, there are few studies of aeromedical patient experiences and outcomes, or clear measures of the service quality provided to these patients.

This study explores whether a previously developed quality framework could usefully be applied to existing air ambulance patient journeys (ie, the sequences of care that span multiple settings; prehospital and hospital-based pre-flight, flight transport, after-flight hospital in-patient, and disposition). The study aimed to use linked data from aeromedical, emergency department (ED), and hospital sources, and from death registries, to document and analyze patient journeys.

A previously developed air ambulance quality framework was used to place patient, prehospital, and in-hospital service outcomes in relevant quality domains identified from the Institutes of Medicine (IOM) and Dr. Donabedian models. To understand the aeromedical patients’ journeys, data from all relevant data sources were linked by unique patient identifiers and the outcomes of the resulting analyses were applied to the air ambulance quality framework.

Overall, air ambulance referral pathways could be classified into three categories: Intraregional (those retrievals which stayed within the region), Out of Region, and Into Region. Patient journeys and service outcomes varied markedly between referral pathways. Prehospital and in-hospital service variables and patient outcomes showed that the framework could be used to explore air ambulance service quality.

The air ambulance quality framework can usefully be applied to air ambulance patient experiences and outcomes using linked data analysis. The framework can help guide prehospital and in-hospital performance reporting. With variations between regional referral pathways, this knowledge will aid with planning within the local service. The study successfully linked data from aeromedical, ED, in-hospital, and death sources and explored the aeromedical patients’ journeys.

There is evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected mental health, but most studies have been conducted in the general population.

To identify factors associated with mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with pre-existing mental illness.

Participants (N = 2869, 78% women, ages 18–94 years) from a UK cohort (the National Centre for Mental Health) with a history of mental illness completed a cross-sectional online survey in June to August 2020. Mental health assessments were the GAD-7 (anxiety), PHQ-9 (depression) and WHO-5 (well-being) questionnaires, and a self-report question on whether their mental health had changed during the pandemic. Regressions examined associations between mental health outcomes and hypothesised risk factors. Secondary analyses examined associations between specific mental health diagnoses and mental health.

A total of 60% of participants reported that mental health had worsened during the pandemic. Younger age, difficulty accessing mental health services, low income, income affected by COVID-19, worry about COVID-19, reduced sleep and increased alcohol/drug use were associated with increased depression and anxiety symptoms and reduced well-being. Feeling socially supported by friends/family/services was associated with better mental health and well-being. Participants with a history of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder or eating disorder were more likely to report that mental health had worsened during the pandemic than individuals without a history of these diagnoses.

We identified factors associated with worse mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with pre-existing mental illness, in addition to specific groups potentially at elevated risk of poor mental health during the pandemic.

Many conservation initiatives call for ‘transformative change’ to counter biodiversity loss, climate change, and injustice. The term connotes fundamental, broad, and durable changes to human relationships with nature. However, if oversimplified or overcomplicated, or not focused enough on power and the political action necessary for change, associated initiatives can perpetuate or exacerbate existing crises. This article aims to help practitioners deliberately catalyze and steer transformation processes. It provides a theoretically and practically grounded definition of ‘transformative conservation’, along with six strategic, interlocking recommendations. These cover systems pedagogy, political mobilization, inner transformation, as well as planning, action, and continual adjustment.

Calls for ‘transformative change’ point to the fundamental reorganization necessary for global conservation initiatives to stem ecological catastrophe. However, the concept risks being oversimplified or overcomplicated, and focusing too little on power and the political action necessary for change. Accordingly, its intersection with contemporary biodiversity and climate change mitigation initiatives needs explicit deliberation and clarification. This article advances the praxis of ‘transformative conservation’ as both (1) a desired process that rethinks the relationships between individuals, society, and nature, and restructures systems accordingly, and (2) a desired outcome that conserves biodiversity while justly transitioning to net zero emission economies and securing the sustainable and regenerative use of natural resources. It first reviews criticisms of area-based conservation targets, natural climate solutions, and nature-based solutions that are framed as transformative, including issues of ecological integrity, livelihoods, gender, equity, growth, power, participation, knowledge, and governance. It then substantiates six strategic recommendations designed to help practitioners deliberately steer transformation processes. These include taking a systems approach; partnering with political movements to achieve equitable and just transformation; linking societal with personal (‘inner’) transformation; updating how we plan; facilitating shifts from diagnosis and planning to action; and improving our ability to adjust to transformation as it occurs.

Curious about stemming the global biodiversity and climate crises? Browse this article on transformative conservation!

Primary aim – To improve how physical health issues are addressed for inpatients with eating disorders

Secondary aim – To improve efficiency within the MDT

The Yorkshire Centre for Eating Disorders (YCED) is an inpatient unit for the treatment of patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Anorexia nervosa has the highest mortality of all psychiatric disorders with an extensive list of physical manifestations. This project was designed to help better address the physical health concerns of our patients by introducing a primary care style, once weekly clinic that patients could self-refer to.

Questionnaires were designed to assess whether a once weekly physical health clinic would benefit the service.

The clinic was run on a weekly basis from 26th April to 24th June 2019. Follow-up questionnaires were designed and distributed to both patients and staff following this period. Data were analysed with Microsoft Excel to determine if improvement had been made.

N = 12 inpatients responded to the initial questionnaires, n = 2 were discharged during the 8 week period so were included in the analysis but did not complete the follow-up questionnaire.

100% of the staff (n = 8) felt a once weekly clinic would benefit their patients. 62% (n = 5) stated they felt distracted from their other duties with physical health requests.

33% (n = 4) of the inpatient group felt the clinic would benefit them with 67% (n = 8) stating indifference to the idea.

26 appointments were conducted in the physical health clinic with 80% (n = 8) of the service users accessing at least once. 70% (n = 7) stated their physical health concerns had been better addressed since the clinic had been started.

90% (n = 9) of inpatients and 90% (n = 9) of staff responded that the physical health clinic should remain permanent. 90% (n = 9) of staff stated they had more time for their other duties since the introduction of the clinic.

Prior to the clinic 63% (n = 5) of staff responded that in a typical day they were approached between 2-5 times for physical health requests with the other 37% (n = 3) being approached once.

Following the clinic 80% (n = 8) of staff responded that they were approached once in a typical working day.

The qualitative data from the questionnaires indicated success in both improving patient care and reducing nursing workload.

The physical health clinic has been made a permanent feature on the ward and has been continued by the incoming foundation doctor and ward ANP.

To improve the confidence and preparedness of junior doctors in managing medical or psychiatric emergencies when on call at an inpatient psychiatric unit.

Facilities for emergency care differ between acute medical and psychiatric units. Protocols for managing acutely deteriorating patients and those requiring immediate resuscitation differ across these organisations.

Managing medical emergencies can be stressful for all involved. Junior doctors rotate between services where the level of support varies depending on specialty and setting. For doctors who have worked in a setting where the minimum emergency response includes a Resuscitation team, moving to an environment with less support available is a challenge.

In our unit, the protocol following an urgent call is for the on-call doctor (who has access to basic resuscitation equipment) to attend and assess the need for paramedics and transfer to local hospital. Stress can be worsened by change of environment, change of expectation and concern about best management in new settings.

A cohort of junior doctors were recruited. Baseline assessment included rating their confidence level (scale 1- 10), listing common medical and psychiatric scenarios they had experienced and those they felt least confident managing. Over a period of 10 weeks, follow-up data was obtained. Interventions to improve confidence were assessed during this period, including a handbook and a teaching session on emergency medications. At the end of the project a wordcloud was created in response to the request to “choose 5 words to describe your feelings when called to an emergency”. Identified themes have been fed back to relevant senior staff and will form the basis of future projects.

The initial average confidence score improved from 4.9 to 9.2 and was sustained out to 14 weeks. According the word cloud the most commonly used words were “morale” and “education”.

Prior to the study, confidence levels amongst the Junior Doctors was low. Introduction of the handbook and teaching session led to an improvement which was sustained. Key themes identified using a word cloud were “morale” and “education”.

For junior doctors moving from between services, different expectations and protocol for management of emergencies can influence confidence levels. Psychiatric units should be cognisant of these concerns and implement evidence-based intervention to support junior doctor confidence and improve quality of working experience.

In the psychiatric care of patients, family involvement is key to recovery. At the New Haven Unit, there have been a number of complaints regarding poor communication and lack of updates given to families during COVID-19.

The aim is to:

To increase the overall satisfaction of the family with the service received for their loved ones

Ensure effective and timely communication of updates to the families, to prevent further complaints, by assigning a member of staff per patient to be the primary individual responsible for family contact

Create an addition to the weekly ward round MDT proforma on ‘Carenotes’ where communication can be documented

A standardised questionnaire has been sent to the relatives of inpatients at the New Haven Unit. Qualitative data are being collated, which will lead to quantitative statistical analysis of the satisfaction ratings.

Based on the current bed state on the ward at the time of the project all 32 relatives of current inpatients were contacted and 23 agreed to complete the survey which was sent out either by email or post.

The new MDT proforma will be added, which will be used to record actions needed to be taken involving communication and updating family members on a weekly basis. This opportunity to record communication will improve continuity of care and satisfaction amongst family members.

There will be follow-up via a second questionnaire to identify improvement.

The average results of selected categories so far are shown below (still awaiting further responses):

Frequency of updates regarding loved ones = 4.33/10 (10-excellent)

To what degree were your concerns listened to? 7.33/10

Quality of content discussed with staff members = 3.33/4 (4- excellent)

Other categories scoring below the expected standard, included awareness of visiting guidelines and questions regarding lasting power of attorney, in which 33.3% of participants responded either ‘no’ or ‘not sure’ respectively.

Questions addressing formalities of introduction and confidentiality through identity confirmation, scored highly.

We are awaiting more survey responses in order to identify additional areas of improvement; however, it is already clear to see that there are areas that would be advanced through structured, assigned reminders via an MDT amendment.

We will also be introducing set dates for conference calls with the families now involving the whole MDT; one within the first week of admission, one after six weeks and one at the point of discharge as a minimum.