We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
By
Emlyn Nardone, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway,
Terrence McDonough, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway
In Chapter 4, David Kotz and one of the present authors argue that the resolution of the crisis of the1970s and early 1980s involved the construction of a new social structure of accumulation (SSA). This new SSA is best characterized as one of global neoliberalism. Kotz and McDonough argue that neoliberalism in this period constituted a multileveled phenomenon that included neoliberal institutions, neoliberal policies, neoliberal theories, and neoliberal ideology. Among neoliberal policies, the aggressive attempt to remove any barriers to the free movement of goods and capital across borders was especially prominent. This provides one of the many links between neoliberalism and globalization. Neoliberalism promoted globalization, and globalization in a dialectical fashion was also at the root of support by capital for the new neoliberal orientation. Increasing international competition undermined profitability. Capital began to pursue a program of deregulation and capital flight as a means to recover profitability. Further, the resultant globalization of production weakened labor and strengthened capital's ability to effectively pursue its newly preferred strategy.
Transformations at the level of the state must be counted among the prominent institutions of this global neoliberalism. Indeed the contemporary changes in domestic state structures and policy have attracted a great deal of analysis. Globalization is easily identified as an influence on these changes. International “competitiveness” has become the stated rationale for government policy in all areas of social life.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.