Herbicides are a critical tool for controlling aggressive invasive species, especially during large-scale restoration efforts, but their persistence in soils can hinder the establishment and success of desirable vegetation. Soil residence times differ among herbicides, and plant species exhibit variable tolerance to residues, causing difficulty in determining appropriate timelines for revegetation activities following herbicide application. Imazapyr is a herbicide commonly used to control highly aggressive species such as giant reed (Arundo donax L.), with reported soil residence time ranging from 3 to 12 mo. However, we observed herbicide damage on foundational tree species installed more than 2 yr after imazapyr was applied to control expansive A. donax monocultures as part of a large-scale riparian forest restoration project. We monitored signs of herbicide damage and growth for willow (Salix) and cottonwood (Populus spp.) individuals installed from cuttings to evaluate the relative susceptibility to and differential impacts of imazapyr residues on trees established using this standard propagation technique. Individuals from all species exhibited signs of herbicide damage, and the height of damaged individuals was significantly lower than that of healthy individuals across species. Red willow (Salix laevigata Bebb) had the greatest percentage of damaged individuals (27%), but the smallest reduction in height due to herbicide damage (−13%). The frequency of herbicide damage was similar among Populus species (≤13%), but the fastest-growing species, black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & A. Gray), experienced a much greater decline in growth (−67%) compared with Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii S. Watson) (−32%) and Fremont × black cottonwood (P. × parryi Sarg.) (−31%). The study found that imazapyr, when used to control invasive monocultural species, can have lingering, previously undocumented effects on non-target riparian vegetation. Despite these negative impacts, imazapyr is still one of the most effective treatment options for some aggressive invaders. Thus, practitioners should be aware of the potential long-term effects of imazapyr and carefully consider species selection and planting schedule during revegetation.

Rodriguez-Nava et al. present a proof-of-concept study evaluating the use of a secure large language model (LLM) approved for healthcare data for retrospective identification of a specific healthcare-associated infection (HAI)—central line-associated bloodstream infections—from real patient data for the purposes of surveillance.1 This study illustrates a promising direction for how LLMs can, at a minimum, semi-automate or streamline HAI surveillance activities.

In 2020 a group of U.S. healthcare leaders formed the National Organization to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (NOHAP) to issue a call to action to address non–ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (NVHAP). NVHAP is one of the most common and morbid healthcare-associated infections, but it is not tracked, reported, or actively prevented by most hospitals. This national call to action includes (1) launching a national healthcare conversation about NVHAP prevention; (2) adding NVHAP prevention measures to education for patients, healthcare professionals, and students; (3) challenging healthcare systems and insurers to implement and support NVHAP prevention; and (4) encouraging researchers to develop new strategies for NVHAP surveillance and prevention. The purpose of this document is to outline research needs to support the NVHAP call to action. Primary needs include the development of better models to estimate the economic cost of NVHAP, to elucidate the pathophysiology of NVHAP and identify the most promising pathways for prevention, to develop objective and efficient surveillance methods to track NVHAP, to rigorously test the impact of prevention strategies proposed to prevent NVHAP, and to identify the policy levers that will best engage hospitals in NVHAP surveillance and prevention. A joint task force developed this document including stakeholders from the Veterans’ Health Administration (VHA), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), The Joint Commission, the American Dental Association, the Patient Safety Movement Foundation, Oral Health Nursing Education and Practice (OHNEP), Teaching Oral-Systemic Health (TOSH), industry partners and academia.

Physical scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, and journalists have all framed Antarctica as a place of global importance—as a laboratory for scientific research, as a strategic site for geopolitical agendas, and more recently as a source of melting ice that could catastrophically inundate populations worldwide. Yet, the changing cryosphere impacts society within Antarctica as well, and this article expands the focus of Antarctic ice research to include human activities on and around the continent. It reframes Antarctica as a place with human history and local activities that are being affected by melting ice, even if the consequences are much smaller in scale than the effects of global sea level rise. Specifically focused on tourism and conservation along the west Antarctica Peninsula (wAP), this article demonstrates the impacts of changing glaciers and sea ice on the timing, location, and type of tourism as well as the ability of changing ice to mediate human experiences through conservation agendas. As future ice conditions influence Antarctic tourism and conservation, an attention to issues emerging within the wAP region offers a new perspective on climate change impacts and the management of Antarctic activities in the 21st-century Anthropocene.