Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for individuals with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder (MDD), yet identifying which patients best respond remains an important area of inquiry. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) serves as a screen for psychological distress, providing measures across three separate domains (e.g., somatization, depression, and anxiety) and one composite score (i.e., global severity index). The psychometric properties of the BSI-18 have been validated across multiple studies; however, it has sparsely been used to track changes in patient symptoms in response to intervention. Assessing patient symptom severity across these domains is imperative since these symptoms can negatively influence cognitive functioning. Accordingly, the current study utilized the BSI-18 to measure psychological distress across these different domains in patients receiving TMS treatment. We hypothesized that all domains of the BSI-18 would see a significant decrease after treatment, that elevated scores in specific domains would predict a less favorable response to treatment, and that measurement of depressive symptoms will be consistent across measures of similar scope.

Veterans (n=94) with MDD and met standard clinical TMS criteria were administered the BSI-18 before and after receiving an adequate dose of treatment (e.g., 30 sessions). Paired Samples T-test were used to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores across domains.

The results of paired sample t-tests indicated a statistically significant reduction in measures of global psychological distress (t(93) = 7.99, p < .001, Cohen's d =.82), as well as depressive (t(93) = 8.34, p < .001, d = .86), anxious (t(93) = 7.64, p < .001, d = .79), and somatic symptoms (t(92) = 5.29, p < .001, d = .55) after receiving treatment. Individuals with elevated levels of anxiety (e.g., BSI-A>63) saw a significant reduction in depressive (t(62) = 8.15, p < .001, d = 1.03), anxious (t(62) = 8.34, p < .001, d = 1.05) and somatic (t(61) = 4.94, p < .001, d = .63) symptoms. Lastly, two measures of depressive symptoms, the BSI-D and PHQ-9, had a statistically significant strong, positive relationship before (r=.66) and after (r=.88) treatment (all n=65 and p<.001).

The BSI-18 can detect changes in different domains of psychological distress as a function of TMS treatment. Unexpectedly, TMS patients with elevated levels of anxiety responded well to treatment despite comorbid anxiety often being associated with less favorable outcomes in treatment trials. The positive relationship of the BSI-D and PHQ-9 before and after treatment suggests the use of the BSI as a valid, additional measure of depressive symptoms.

This study builds on the work by Rehman et al (2022) who argued that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment not only helps treat depression but also decreases sleep problems such as difficulty falling asleep,staying asleep, and waking too early. The present study further explores differences in sleep onset latency, meaning the time it takes to fall asleep, and duration of sleep per night in the pre and post treatment phases of rTMS. The information regarding major attributes of sleep is critical because recent research shows that about 90% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) also struggle with sleep disorders (Li et al., 2022), and sleeping for less than seven hours may eventually lead to sleep deprivation (Hirshkowitz et al., 2015), with increased risk of physical and mental health problems (Sheehan et al, 2019). Sleep onset latency estimates vary from individual to individual but typical sleep latency is considered between 10 to 20 minutes (Jung et al, 2013). As it has been shown that overall sleep problems improve with rTMS, we hypothesized that self-reported sleep onset latency will decrease, and sleep duration will increase.

All participants met inclusion criteria for MDD diagnosis and completed a full course of TMS treatment (N=470; Mean age=53.45, SD=13.73). The sample was mostly male (81%) and ethnically diverse: 77.7% non-Hispanic White, 13.3% Black Americans, 1.9% Asian, 0.2 % Asian Indian, and 1.9% other ethnicities. Sleep problems were assessed using the following questions at the pre and post treatment stages: the number of minutes it takes to fall asleep and duration of sleep each night.

A Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was conducted to determine whether there was a difference in sleep onset latency and hours of sleep per night between pre and post intervention. The results indicated a significant difference in time to fall asleep between pre and post treatment (pre-treatment M = 1.19, SD = 0.99, post-treatment M = 0.93, SD = 0.91; z = -5.01, p < .001. In addition, there was a significant increase in the minutes of sleep per night in pre (M = 6.11, SD = 2.07) compared to the post treatment (M = 6.32, SD = 1.77), z = -2.56, p = .010.

Reduced sleep is known to negatively impact mood, cognitive ability, work performance, and immune function (Besedovsky et al., 2012; Killgore, 2010; Massar et al, 2019; Vandekerckhove & Wang, 2018). Similarly, longer sleep onset latency can cause an individual to enter the first sleep stage later than expected and complete fewer sleep cycles. The results of the present study show the effectiveness of rTMS in decreasing sleep onset latency and increasing the duration of sleep. Given the comorbidity and bidirectionality between sleep disturbances and mood disorders (Fang et al., 2019; Palagini et al., 2019), further researching treatments such as rTMS to improve sleep as a means to also improve mood is crucial. We propose acquiring knowledge about sleep attributes as an essential part of clinicians’ work early on in the rTMS treatment in order to monitor an individual’s global functioning level in light of improved sleep.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an evidenced based treatment for adults with treatment resistant depression (TRD). The standard clinical protocol for TMS is to stimulate the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Although the DLPFC is a defining region in the cognitive control network of the brain and implicated in executive functions such as attention and working memory, we lack knowledge about whether TMS improves cognitive function independent of depression symptoms. This exploratory analysis sought to address this gap in knowledge by assessing changes in attention before and after completion of a standard treatment with TMS in Veterans with TRD.

Participants consisted of 7 Veterans (14.3% female; age M = 46.14, SD = 7.15; years education M = 16.86, SD = 3.02) who completed a full 30-session course of TMS treatment and had significant depressive symptoms at baseline (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9 score >5). Participants were given neurocognitive assessments measuring aspects of attention [Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS-IV) subtests: Digits Forward, Digits Backward, and Number Sequencing) at baseline and again after completion of TMS treatment. The relationship between pre and post scores were examined using paired-samples t-test for continuous variables and a linear regression to covary for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which is often comorbid with depression in Veteran populations.

There was a significant improvement in Digit Span Forward (p=.01, d=-.53), but not Digit Span Backward (p=.06) and Number Sequencing (p=.54) post-TMS treatment. Depression severity was not a significant predictor of performance on Digit Span Forward (f(1,5)=.29, p=.61) after TMS treatment. PTSD severity was also not a significant predictor of performance on Digit Span Forward (f(1,5)=1.31, p=.32).

Findings suggested that a standard course of TMS improves less demanding measures of working memory after a full course of TMS, but possibly not the more demanding aspects of working memory. This improvement in cognitive function was independent of improvements in depression and PTSD symptoms. Further investigation in a larger sample and with direct neuroimaging measures of cognitive function is warranted.

Prior trials suggest that intravenous racemic ketamine is a highly effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but phase 3 trials of racemic ketamine are needed.

To assess the acute efficacy and safety of a 4-week course of subcutaneous racemic ketamine in participants with TRD. Trial registration: ACTRN12616001096448 at www.anzctr.org.au.

This phase 3, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled multicentre trial was conducted at seven mood disorders centres in Australia and New Zealand. Participants received twice-weekly subcutaneous racemic ketamine or midazolam for 4 weeks. Initially, the trial tested fixed-dose ketamine 0.5 mg/kg versus midazolam 0.025 mg/kg (cohort 1). Dosing was revised, after a Data Safety Monitoring Board recommendation, to flexible-dose ketamine 0.5–0.9 mg/kg or midazolam 0.025–0.045 mg/kg, with response-guided dosing increments (cohort 2). The primary outcome was remission (Montgomery-Åsberg Rating Scale for Depression score ≤10) at the end of week 4.

The final analysis (those who received at least one treatment) comprised 68 in cohort 1 (fixed-dose), 106 in cohort 2 (flexible-dose). Ketamine was more efficacious than midazolam in cohort 2 (remission rate 19.6% v. 2.0%; OR = 12.1, 95% CI 2.1–69.2, P = 0.005), but not different in cohort 1 (remission rate 6.3% v. 8.8%; OR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.2–8.2, P = 0.76). Ketamine was well tolerated. Acute adverse effects (psychotomimetic, blood pressure increases) resolved within 2 h.

Adequately dosed subcutaneous racemic ketamine was efficacious and safe in treating TRD over a 4-week treatment period. The subcutaneous route is practical and feasible.