To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article examines the claim that experimental neuroscience is key to an improved understanding of actus reus. It focuses on the assumptions made by neuroscientists about the nature of actus reus and their principal conclusion that the voluntary act component thereof is essentially an endogenous process originating in the brain. The article contends that neuroscientists have misconstrued what lawyers and judges mean by actus reus such that their experimental findings on the subject are irremediably flawed.
B. STATUTORY RAPE UNDER THE CRIMINAL LAW AMENDMENT ACT 1935
C. CC v IRELAND
(1) Decision and reasoning
(2) Strict liability and punishing the morally innocent
(3) Strict liability and serious crime
(4) Strict liability and statutory rape
(5) The constitution and the criminal law
D. THE LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE TO CC
(1) The key provisions of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006
(2) An assessment of the 2006 Act
E. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter is based on a report written in my capacity as Criminal Law Rapporteur for the Legal Protection of Children,which I had the honour of submitting to the Dáil and Seanad for consideration and debate on the subject of statutory rape and cognate offences. It tells the story of what happens when the fundamental doctrines of the criminal law are perceived to conflict with constitutional norms; at all events, it offers an Irish perspective on this difficult problem. I am honoured to be able to contribute a chapter to this Festschrift. I have known Sir Gerald since the autumn of 1968 when, as a young law graduate, I arrived at Edinburgh University to take the Diploma in Criminology. In my first weeks in that beautiful city, I purchased and read the first edition of Sir Gerald's treatise on the criminal law of Scotland, and knew instantly that my relationship with the discipline of criminology was destined to be a flirtation.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.