Despite the large number of collection rocords available, there has recently been some debate concerning how host-specific ticks are. A quantitative data set is presented for the host preferences of African ticks. The results are based on 43,615 individual collection records from published sources covering most countries in mainland Africa. Out of 223 ticks species, 112 have been collected 20 times or more; 14 of these are generalists and at least 39 are potential specialists. Further collections are needed for greater clarity in many cases. It is important that people working on problems that relate to tick-host interactions are aware of the context in which these occur, lest they make false a prior hypotheses about the importance of hosts or parasites in the system.

The quantification of host–parasite associations from field data is a fundamental step towards understanding host–parasite and host-parasite–pathogen dynamics. For parasites that are not rigid host specialists, exemplified in this paper by ticks, the interpretation of host–parasite association data is difficult. Interpretations of tick collection records have largely assumed that off-host collection records offer a valid basis from which to make claims about the host specificity or generality of tick species. A simple simulation analysis of rudimentary tick–host interactions in a hypothetical 50 × 50-cell habitat demonstrates that perceptions of tick–host relationships can be strongly biased by spatial patterns. Regardless of their true level of host specificity or generality, it seems that: (i) more abundant ticks will be perceived as generalists, while rarer species will be considered specialists; and (ii) tick species that have patchy, strongly aggregated distributions will be more likely to be perceived as host specialists than species that have more dispersed or uniform distributions. Since all available evidence suggests that abundances and spatial patterns vary between tick species, there is no way of assessing the true validity of claims about host specificity without first undertaking detailed research on the relative abundances and spatial and temporal patterns of both tick and host distributions.

The factors that set broad-scale limits on the species ranges of ticks have not been clearly defined, despite their potential importance for the study and control of ticks. A database of 33,989 published collection records for African ticks is used to test the hypothesis that the outer limits to tick species ranges are determined by the distributions of their hosts. Distribution maps for many of the more economically important tick species are given. Direct comparisons of the known ranges of ticks and their hosts show that the hypothesis of a host-determined species range is supported for only one tick species, Amblyomma rhinocerotis (de Geer), which has been constrained by the near-eradication of its rhinoceros hosts. At least 97 other species are not host-limited; the quality of available host-use and distribution information is insufficient to draw strong conclusions about the (approximately) 132 remaining species. In general, the boundaries to tick species ranges are more likely to be set by factors such as vegetation and climate.