We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 23 sets Goethe’s Farbenlehre (Theory of Colours) in context. Colour had been the subject of intensive study, both aesthetic and scientific, in the eighteenth century, and the chapter reconstructs the many influences on Goethe and his contemporaries, from the recent discoveries of Herschel and Ritter, to earlier figures, above all Newton, but even Aristotle and Hippocrates. The chapter also presents the central tenets of Goethe’s Farbenlehre, with a particular focus on the theoretical first part, which offers a physiological theory of colours and deals with the physical nature of light.
Biochar as a boon for soil fertility in the tropics still has to show that it is able to provide the same benefits to soils in temperate regions. Here an Austrian study with the objective to analyze the extent of benefits that biochar application offers to agricultural soils in Europe beyond its role as a carbon sequestration strategy is presented. Based on hypothesis testing, several potential benefits of biochar were examined in a series of lab analyses, greenhouse and field experiments. Three hypotheses could be confirmed: biochar can protect groundwater by reducing the nitrate migration in seepage water; biochar can mitigate atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation by reducing soil N2O emissions; and biochar can improve soil physical properties by increasing water storage capacity. One hypothesis was only partly confirmed: biochar supports the thriving of soil microorganisms only in specific soil and climate settings. Two hypotheses were refuted: biochar does not generally provide nutrients to plants except when produced from specific feedstocks or by combining it with mineral or organic fertilizers; the cost-effectiveness of biochar application is not given under current production costs if the existing benefits of biochar are not transferable to financial value.
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Literary history offers a guide to the canon of great books. It matters little whether one picks up a history of literature from the nineteenth century or a modern one; they all tend to more or less salvage a small collection of books from the ocean of those published. For the year 1809, for example, any given history of German literature will highlight Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's novel Die Wahlverwandtschaften (Elective Affinities), as if no other work of literature had been published that year. This is the case regardless of whether one consults Hermann Hettner's literary history from 1870 or R. H. Stephenson's essay on the novel in Weimar classicism from 2005. A brief perusal of a book catalogue from around 1809, however, suggests an alternative to this canonical picture of literary history. Approximately one hundred German novels were published in 1809. Among the widely read novels included in this list are, for example, the third volume of August Lafontaine's Die beiden Bräute (The Two Brides) and August Kotzebue's Philbert oder die Verhältnisse (Philbert or the Circumstances). The canon is one story; the cultural history of read books is another. For those who believe that literary history should be more than the history of great books, a corpus-based approach offers one way of dealing with the thousands of books that actually circulated. And we are not using “thousands” metaphorically in speaking of the literary history of the nineteenth century, even when we limit ourselves to the German-speaking countries.
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
Edited by
Matt Erlin, Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures,Lynne Tatlock, Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis
In nineteenth-century Germany, breakthroughs in printing technology and an increasingly literate populace led to an unprecedented print production boom that has long presented scholars with a challenge: how to read it all? This anthology seeks new answers to the scholarly quandary of the abundance of text. Responding to Franco Moretti's call for "distant reading" and modeling a range of innovative approaches to literary-historical analysis informed by theburgeoning field of digital humanities, it asks what happens when we shift our focus from the one to the many, from the work to the network. The thirteen essays in this volume explore the evolving concept of "distant reading" and its application to the analysis of German literature and culture in the long nineteenth century. The contributors consider how new digital technologies enable both the testing of hypotheses and the discovery of patterns and trends, as well as how "distant" and traditional "close" reading can complement each another in hybrid models of analysis that maintain careful attention to detail, but also make calculation, enumeration, and empirical descriptioncritical elements of interpretation. Contributors: Kirsten Belgum, Tobias Boes, Matt Erlin, Fotis Jannidis and Gerhard Lauer, Lutz Koepnick, Todd Kontje, Peter M. McIsaac, Katja Mellmann, Nicolas Pethes, Andrew Piper and Mark Algee-Hewitt, Allen Beye Riddell, Lynne Tatlock, Paul A. Youngman and Ted Carmichael. Matt Erlin is Professor of German and Chair of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures, and Lynne Tatlock is Hortense and Tobias Lewin Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, both at Washington University, St. Louis.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.