To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
People who seek advice about their mental health or help with their psychological distress may use complex metaphors to communicate. It can be helpful for psychiatrists to be attuned to the details of people’s language. In this brief article, we offer two vignettes to illustrate how metaphors can open up understanding in psychiatric practice.
Edited by
Liz McDonald, East London NHS Foundation Trust,Roch Cantwell, Perinatal Mental Health Service and West of Scotland Mother & Baby Unit,Ian Jones, Cardiff University
Mothers who kill their own children are unusual women whose offences often elicit fear, horror and condemnation in others. Psychiatrists may be asked to assess such women to explore the relationship between the offence and maternal mental illness, and the potential risk to other children. In this chapter, I discuss some available data on mothers who kill, in terms of criminal justice statistics, and review accounts of motives for such killings. I briefly discuss the legal processes that mother who kill must face, and the role of the psychiatrist. I then discuss some recent research about the role of maternal attachment security in relation to attitudes towards children and the transition to motherhood and the potential for psychological disorder that arise during that transition. I also comment on social factors, such as the role of partners and fathers. I conclude with some discussion about the management of cases where mental illness is a risk factor for filicide, and the associated child protection issues that may arise in such cases.
Edited by
Liz McDonald, East London NHS Foundation Trust,Roch Cantwell, Perinatal Mental Health Service and West of Scotland Mother & Baby Unit,Ian Jones, Cardiff University
Personality disorder (PD) is a complex condition, which has been the subject of both debate and research. However, maternal PD has only been the focus of research in the last two decades. In this chapter I discuss that research in the context of what is known generally about PD, as a disorder with a predictable presentation of signs and symptoms; an aetiology, and indications for effective treatment. There has been more research on maternal PD in the last 15 years, which shows that mothers with PD may struggle to care for their children, especially in the postnatal period, and their mental health may also deteriorate during pregnancy. In this chapter I describe the issues described above and discuss how clinicians approach the management of mothers with PD. I place special emphasis on the impact of maternal PD on mother-child relationships and attachment, and the implications for child health.
‘Forensic psychotherapy’ is a shorthand term for the treatment of offenders with psychodynamic psychotherapy. Over the last decade, a range of psychological therapies for offenders have been developed, often based on improved therapies for personality disorder. The author discusses what distinguishes forensic psychotherapy from other psychological therapies offered to offenders; and which offenders might benefit most from psychodynamically focussed therapy. The author describes how psychological treatments broadly fit within the risk needs responsivity construct and the matched stepped care system. Matched stepped care and an appropriate governance framework ensure services deliver evidence-based practices, targeting underlying needs. Clear treatment pathways exist, low- to high-intensity interventions are provided with good fidelity and the right people skills are in place to deliver these interventions. The requirement to step up in intensity and expertise level of treatment is based on a clinical formulation and risk. Having the right service in the right place at the right time delivered by the right professional is critical to reducing risk among people who are violent.
This chapter discusses how issues of spirituality present in forensic psychiatric practice, and especially in the treatment of offenders with mental health disorders. The context of the work of forensic psychiatric services is described. Then three domains of forensic psychiatric practice (the medico-legal, secure psychiatric care and existential forensic psychiatry) are explored, and the ways in which issues of spirituality arise are considered. The chapter concludes with some comments about the importance of the forensic psychiatrist keeping an open mind that can change, in order that his or her patients may experience change. The work draws on the author’s experience of forensic and prison services in England and Wales; prisoners are referred to mainly as ‘he’ because the majority of both offenders and prisoners are male.
This chapter will be divided into two parts. The first on suicide will look at the current epidemiology of suicide, the psychodynamic understanding of the pathway to a death of this nature and the effect the suicide of a patient can have on the clinician and teams working with them. The second part will describe the psychodynamic understanding of homicide. The suicide section is written by Dr Rachel Gibbons and the homicide section by Dr Gwen Adshead.
To explore the experiences and support needs of consultant forensic psychiatrists, whose patients had committed homicide while under their care. We circulated a survey to all forensic psychiatrists in the UK, through the Royal College of Psychiatrists, asking about their experiences of a homicide by a patient under their care. Respondents were invited to discuss their experiences further in a structured telephone interview and themes were identified from these discussions. Data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively.
Results
One-third of the 86 respondents had had at least one patient who had committed a homicide while under their care. Of these, over three-quarters (78%) reported that the homicide had a significant impact on their personal life, professional life and/or mental/physical health. For some respondents, the impact was severe and long term. Respondents generally felt that they would have been helped by receiving more support in the aftermath of the homicide.
Clinical implications
Greater recognition is needed of the impact on treating psychiatrists of homicide by a patient and more support is needed for affected clinicians. Further research is necessary, including the effects of such events on colleagues in other specialties and examination of the costs versus the benefits of mandatory inquiries after homicides.
The Royal College of Psychiatrists’ continuing professional development (CPD) module on clinical ethics in psychiatry by Pearce & Tan describes some common ethical dilemmas in psychiatric practice and the work of clinical ethics committees in analysing these dilemmas. In this article we build upon their work and offer additional exploration of the nature of ethical dilemmas in psychiatry. We also build upon the models of reasoning that are described in the module and suggest ways for psychiatrists to think about ethical dilemmas when a clinical ethics committee is not available.
In this commentary, I draw on Hook & Devereux to explore the role of insecure attachment in boundary-violating doctors. I also explore the potential contribution of personality dysfunction in that small proportion of doctors who breach professional boundaries.
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
G. A. worked with Dr Hook at St George's Hospital, London, and has also worked at the Clinic for Boundaries Studies, where he has worked.
The 2015 Supreme Court judgment in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 established that consent to medical treatment requires shared decision-making based on dialogue between the clinician and patient. In this editorial, we examine what Montgomery means for standards of good psychiatric practice, and argue that it represents an opportunity for delivering best practice in psychiatric care.
Leadership is a key role for psychiatrists, with many models that can be adopted depending in part on the nature of the individual and their training, the primary task of the team and the nature of the organisation. In this article we suggest a new concept and model of leadership, ‘psychotherapeutic leadership’. We discuss the theoretical background to this model, its benefits and the implications for training and professional development.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Understand the concept and role of the psychiatrist in providing psychotherapeutic leadership at an individual patient, team and organisational level
• Explore how applying an understanding of psychodynamic principles in practice can provide containment in psychiatry and aid clinical leadership
• Understand the role of psychotherapeutically informed approaches in recognising factors influencing staff morale and burnout
In this editorial, I suggest that no psychiatrist should be without a working knowledge of attachment theory, and it is a capability that all trainees should cover in the proposed new curriculum. I have focused on three domains of research to argue that attachment theory is relevant to practicing psychiatrists.