This report describes the response, action plan, and after-action changes adopted by the Louisiana State University New Orleans (LSU-NO)–Emergency Medicine (EM) Residency Program in response to Hurricane Ida, which occurred in New Orleans, Louisiana in late August through early September 2021. Summarized are the redistribution of emergency department (ED) residents within the primary clinical site, University Medical Center New Orleans (UMCNO); the daily communication flow from chief residents and program leadership; and discussions pertaining to procedural revisions instituted following investigation of pre- and post-hurricane operations.

Small-group debrief sessions and after-action reports were conducted post-storm to discuss perceived deficiencies from a resident stand-point. Debriefing occurred between chief residents and individual classes through standardized residency forums. Additionally, an after-action committee, comprised of senior residents, academic faculty, and ancillary personnel, convened a separate counsel with hospital administration-level leadership to analyze retrospective limitations that occurred both during, and immediately following, Code Grey activation.

Following data collection and analysis from the various feedback channels, several changes were made to the residency’s Code Grey activation plan going into the 2022-2023 academic residency year. The information obtained was used to develop a more formalized Code Grey process, and to create more robust orientation and education materials for residents.

Throughout the events of Hurricane Ida, the LSU-NO Emergency Medicine Department at University Medical Center New Orleans managed a substantial intensification in daily emergency medical activity, while contending with a near-immediate reduction in available resources. Consequently, our program has formalized a more durable residency response to future disasters, including real-time, evolving evacuation correspondence and modernized protocols for rapid re-distribution of resident-power. These procedures are now distributed and practiced throughout each residency year and reinforced on an ad hoc basis in advance of any major weather-related events predicted to impact the greater New Orleans metropolitan area.

Previous research suggests that many people receiving mental health treatment do not meet criteria for a mental disorder but are rather ‘the worried well’.

To examine the association of past-year mental health treatment with DSM-IV disorders.

The World Health Organization's World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys interviewed community samples of adults in 23 countries (n = 62 305) about DSM-IV disorders and treatment in the past 12 months for problems with emotions, alcohol or drugs.

Roughly half (52%) of people who received treatment met criteria for a past-year DSM-IV disorder, an additional 18% for a lifetime disorder and an additional 13% for other indicators of need (multiple subthreshold disorders, recent stressors or suicidal behaviours). Dose–response associations were found between number of indicators of need and treatment.

The vast majority of treatment in the WMH countries goes to patients with mental disorders or other problems expected to benefit from treatment.

Mental and physical disorders are associated with total disability, but their effects on days with partial disability (i.e. the ability to perform some, but not full-role, functioning in daily life) are not well understood.

To estimate individual (i.e. the consequences for an individual with a disorder) and societal effects (i.e. the avoidable partial disability in the society due to disorders) of mental and physical disorders on days with partial disability around the world.

Respondents from 26 nationally representative samples (n = 61 259, age 18+) were interviewed regarding mental and physical disorders, and day-to-day functioning. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) was used to assess mental disorders; partial disability (expressed in full day equivalents) was assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in the CIDI 3.0.

Respondents with disorders reported about 1.58 additional disability days per month compared with respondents without disorders. At the individual level, mental disorders (especially post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and bipolar disorder) yielded a higher number of days with disability than physical disorders. At the societal level, the population attributable risk proportion due to physical and mental disorders was 49% and 15% respectively.

Mental and physical disorders have a considerable impact on partial disability, at both the individual and at the societal level. Physical disorders yielded higher effects on partial disability than mental disorders.

Little is known about the cross-national population prevalence or correlates of personality disorders.

To estimate prevalence and correlates of DSM–IV personality disorder clusters in the World Health Organization World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys.

International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE) screening questions in 13 countries (n = 21 162) were calibrated to masked IPDE clinical diagnoses. Prevalence and correlates were estimated using multiple imputation.

Prevalence estimates are 6.1% (s.e. = 0.3) for any personality disorder and 3.6% (s.e. = 0.3), 1.5% (s.e. = 0.1) and 2.7% (s.e. = 0.2) for Clusters A, B and C respectively. Personality disorders are significantly elevated among males, the previously married (Cluster C), unemployed (Cluster C), the young (Clusters A and B) and the poorly educated. Personality disorders are highly comorbid with Axis I disorders. Impairments associated with personality disorders are only partially explained by comorbidity.

Personality disorders are relatively common disorders that often co-occur with Axis I disorders and are associated with significant role impairments beyond those due to comorbidity.