To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare and disabling neuroinflammatory disorder. Previous studies of aquaporin-4 IgG-positive (AQP4+) NMOSD in Canada have been limited by small sample sizes and regional focus. This study aimed to characterize the sociodemographic and clinical profile of individuals living with AQP4+ NMOSD and the treatment landscape in a multicenter study.
Methods:
Data were collected from the CAnadian Neuromyelitis OPTIca Spectrum Disorder and other atypical demyelinating diseases Cohort Study (CANOPTICS), a prospective longitudinal study involving seven Canadian centers. Participants were diagnosed with AQP4+ NMOSD using the 2015 International Panel for NMO Diagnostic criteria. We analyzed sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in addition to treatment utilization over time.
Results:
133 participants with AQP4+ NMOSD were included, with a mean (SD) age of 52.0 (15.0) years at enrollment and 45.9 (15.5) years at index attack. Most were female (84.9%), ethnically and racially varied (33.3% North American or European White, 25.2% African/Caribbean Black, 22.7% East/Southeast Asian) and born abroad (63.3%). Two-thirds had moderate or mild disability, as measured by an Expanded Disability Status Scale of 3.5 or less. Azathioprine was the most used first-line therapy (59.3%), followed by mycophenolate mofetil (12.5%) and rituximab (10.5%). Use of novel monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was least common (6.3%); however, first-line use of rituximab and novel MAbs increased in recent years (2018–2023).
Conclusions:
Canadians with AQP4+ NMOSD are predominantly female and ethnically and racially varied, with more favorable outcomes than in previous reports. Despite a trend toward increasing use of rituximab and novel MAbs, these higher-efficacy treatments remain underutilized for NMOSD in Canada.
We aimed to (1) report updated estimates of direct healthcare costs for people living with MS (pwMS), (2) contrast costs to a control population and (3) explore differences between disability levels among pwMS.
Methods:
Administrative data were used to identify adult pwMS (MS cohort) and without (control cohort) in Alberta, Canada; disability level (based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale) among pwMS was estimated. One- and two-part generalized linear models with gamma distribution were used to estimate the incremental direct healthcare cost (2021 $CDN) of MS during a 1-year observation period.
Results:
Adjusting for confounders, the total healthcare cost ratio was higher in the MS cohort (n = 13,089) versus control (n = 150,080) (5.24 [95% CI: 5.08, 5.41]) with a predicted incremental cost of $15,016 (95% CI: $14,497, $15,535) per person-year. Among the MS cohort, total predicted direct healthcare costs were higher with greater disability, $14,430 (95% CI: $13,980, $14,880) to $58,697 ($51,514, $65,879) per person-year in mild and severe disability, respectively. The primary health resource cost component shifted from disease-modifying therapies in mild disability to supportive care in moderate and severe disability.
Conclusion:
Adult pwMS had greater direct healthcare costs than those without. Extrapolating to the population level (where 14,485 adult pwMS were identified in the study), it is estimated that $218 million per year in healthcare costs may be attributable to MS in Alberta. The significantly larger economic impact associated with greater disability underscores the importance of preventing or delaying disease progression and functional impairment in MS.
Understanding disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use and healthcare resource utilization by different geographical areas among people living with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) may identify care gaps that can be used to inform policies and practice to ensure equitable care.
Methods:
Administrative data was used to identify pwMS on April 1, 2017 (index date) in Alberta. DMT use and healthcare resource utilization were compared between those who resided in various geographical areas over a 2-year post-index period; simple logistic regression was applied.
Results:
Among the cohort (n = 12,338), a higher proportion of pwMS who resided in urban areas (versus rural) received ≥ 1 DMT dispensation (32.3% versus 27.4%), had a neurologist (67.7% versus 63.9%), non-neurologist specialist (88.3% versus 82.9%), ambulatory care visit (87.4% versus 85.3%), and MS tertiary clinic visit (59.2% versus 51.7%), and a lower proportion had an emergency department (ED) visit (46.3% versus 62.4%), and hospitalization (20.4% versus 23.0%). Across the provincial health zones, there were variations in DMT selection, and a higher proportion of pwMS who resided in the Calgary health zone, where care is managed by MS tertiary clinic neurologists, had an outpatient visit to a neurologist or MS tertiary clinic versus those who resided in other zones where delivery of MS-related care is more varied.
Conclusions:
Urban/rural inequalities in DMT use and healthcare resource utilization appear to exist among pwMS in Alberta. Findings suggest the exploration of barriers with consequent strategies to increase access to DMTs and provide timely outpatient MS care management, particularly for those pwMS residing in rural areas.
Autoimmune encephalitis is increasingly recognized as a neurologic cause of acute mental status changes with similar prevalence to infectious encephalitis. Despite rising awareness, approaches to diagnosis remain inconsistent and evidence for optimal treatment is limited. The following Canadian guidelines represent a consensus and evidence (where available) based approach to both the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with autoimmune encephalitis. The guidelines were developed using a modified RAND process and included input from specialists in autoimmune neurology, neuropsychiatry and infectious diseases. These guidelines are targeted at front line clinicians and were created to provide a pragmatic and practical approach to managing such patients in the acute setting.
Early and effective treatment of central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory disorders is vital to reduce neurologic morbidity and improve long-term outcomes in affected children. Rituximab is a B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody whose off-label use for these disorders is funded in the province of Alberta, Canada, by the Short-Term Exceptional Drug Therapy (STEDT) program. This study describes the use of rituximab for pediatric CNS inflammatory disorders in Alberta.
Methods:
Rituximab applications for CNS inflammatory indications in patients <18 years of age were identified from the STEDT database between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. Patient information was linked to other provincial datasets including the Discharge Abstract Database, Pharmaceutical Information Network, and Provincial Laboratory data. Analysis was descriptive.
Results:
Fifty-one unique rituximab applications were identified, of which 50 were approved. New applications increased from one in 2012 to a high of 12 in 2018. The most common indication was autoimmune encephalitis without a specified antibody (n = 16, 31%). Most children were approved for a two-dose (n = 33, 66%) or four-dose (n = 16, 32%) induction regimen. Physician-reported outcomes were available for 24 patients, of whom 14 (58%) were felt to have fully met outcome targets.
Conclusion:
The use of rituximab for pediatric CNS inflammatory disorders has increased, particularly for the indication of autoimmune encephalitis. This study identified significant heterogeneity in dosing practices and laboratory monitoring. Standardized protocols for the use of rituximab in these disorders and more robust outcome reporting will help better define the safety and efficacy of rituximab in this population
Intravenous rt-PA (IV rt-PA) for acute stroke has raised many concerns, including its inadvertent use in patients presenting with acute stroke-like symptoms as the expression of their somatoform disorder. Diagnosis of the somatoform disorder is often delayed, and thrombolytics in these patients for their stroke-like presentation subjects them to risk for hemorrhage.
Methods:
The presentation, neurological findings, and the therapeutic decision making was audited in 85 patients who received IV rt-PA for a diagnosis of acute stroke. All the surviving patients were re-examined neurologically at least three months after IV rt-PA. Baseline and follow-up brain CT scans were re-reviewed by a neuroradiologist who was blinded to clinical presentation and outcome. Patients whose clinical presentation, brain CT and neurological outcome did not fit into known or expected anatomical and clinical patterns of stroke underwent psychological assessment using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2.
Results:
In two patients three stroke-like presentations of somatoform disorder inadvertently were treated with IV rt-PA. This was primarily caused by abbreviated neurological examination and narrow differential diagnosis.
Interpretation:
Patients with somatoform disorder may present with symptoms mimicking acute stroke. Under the time constraints of IV rt-PA use, a diagnosis of somatoform disorder can be missed, subjecting such patients to the potential complications of thrombolytics.
Environmental Biology offers a fresh, problem-solving treatment of the topic for students requiring a biology background before further study in environmental science, sustainable development or environmental engineering. It begins with an environmental theme that carries through the text, using three major case studies with a regional focus. Key foundational knowledge is introduced and developed as the text progresses, with students encouraged to integrate their accumulated learning to reach solutions. A comprehensive coverage of scientific method, including field experimentation and field techniques, is an important part of the approach. While emphasising the environmental theme, the book introduces all facets of the biology discipline, including cell biology, evolution, ecology, conservation and restoration. There are over 500 line drawings, diagrams and photos throughout, including full-colour sections, and each chapter includes summaries and comprehensive questions. The accompanying online Instructors' Resource includes multiple-choice questions, 'Test your knowledge' solutions and video footage.
About 65 million years ago, life on Earth was stressed by global climate change and rising sea levels. At this time, two large asteroids struck the planet simultaneously in North and South America. The impacts threw a huge dust cloud into the atmosphere and blocked the sun for at least several months. They also coincided with the extinction of the large dinosaurs and profound changes in other life.
Biologist Peter Ward has called attention to similarities between that time and our own. Climate change and rising sea levels are stressing the world's biota again and, to use Ward's analogy, another ‘asteroid’ struck in Africa about 100000 years ago – the evolution of the human species. Ward argues that the rise of humans has meant the diminishment of the great diversity of life on Earth, in just the same way as the impacts of the earlier asteroids altered the direction of evolution.
In this first theme of Environmental Biology we examine why an understanding of our species is essential to understanding and conserving the diversity of life.
In introducing the discipline of conservation biology Gary Meffe, C. Ronald Carroll and Martha Groom stated three unifying principles:
Evolution unites all biology (the evolutionary play).
The ecological world is dynamic (the ecological theatre).
Humans must be included in conservation planning (people are part of the play).
Your study so far in Environmental Biology should leave you in no doubt about all three maxims, but we have not yet discussed how to integrate the human element with your understanding of evolution and ecology.
In this final theme of Environmental Biology we apply your knowledge and understanding from the earlier themes to solving applied conservation problems or to redressing environmental damage. Good scientific method is at the core of all solutions, complemented by a thorough understanding of biodiversity and the interactions of species through the application of evolutionary and ecological principles.
The main characteristics of organisms from the various kingdoms of life were selected through evolution because they adapt the organisms to their physical and biotic environments. As biologists Marc Johnson and John Stinchcombe point out, we now realise that genetic variation and evolution within a species influence not only that species but also others with which it interacts and the surrounding environment. Thus the study of the interactions within and between species and their environment, collectively called ecology, is also the study of evolution in action. This is the topic of this theme.
We consider interactions between organisms of the same species as they build up a population and then examine the interactions between different species living together and forming a community. Finally, we cover the main characteristics of marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments and how the interactions between the communities within them and the physical environment form characteristic ecosystems. We need different techniques to study the microbes, plants and animals in the ecosystems and we describe some of them, as well as some of the instruments available and the ways of analysing and presenting data.
There are many excellent introductory biology textbooks available, so why write another? The answer lies partly in the rapid expansion of modern biology and partly in the needs and aspirations of modern students.
The second half of the 20th century and the early 21st century have seen such major developments as the unravelling of the structure of DNA, the complete cataloguing of the genome of humans and other species, and the first successful cloning. These developments are reflected in university biology curricula, which offer new units and courses in subjects such as molecular genetics and biotechnology and a much greater prominence for molecular biology in introductory textbooks. Simultaneously, other biologists have noted with concern the impacts of climate change, increasing human populations and changing technologies on natural environments and other species. They note that the rate of extinction in species at present is well above the background extinction rate shown in the fossil record, suggesting that the world is in a period of human-caused mass extinction that is reducing our biological heritage. These realisations are reflected in the curricula too, with new courses and units in conservation biology and restoration biology, as well as chapters on conservation in introductory textbooks.
Students majoring in biology at university need a thorough grounding in all these new areas as well as the more traditional aspects of the discipline. They are well served by existing textbooks, but many non-majors lack the space in their crowded timetables to cover all the topics in such detail.
Early this century biologists recognised that some regions of the Earth were unusually rich in the number of unique species living there but also threatened by human activity. They called these regions ‘biodiversity hotspots’. Thirty-four are currently recognised, including the South-west Botanical Province in Western Australia. This area of about 360000 km2 is characterised by low soil fertility and a Mediterranean climate, with most rainfall during winter and dry summers. It is bounded to the south and west by ocean and by desert to the north and east. The climate, low soil fertility and isolation are the driving forces in the evolution of a diverse and unique biota. The province contains nearly 6000 described plant species (including about 4500 unique to the region) and 456 vertebrates (including 100 unique to the region). Although the invertebrate diversity is poorly described, it is likely to be extremely rich as well.
In this third theme of Environmental Biology we apply your understanding of the scientific method to the problems of classifying the diversity of life in biodiversity hotspots and elsewhere on Earth. You will also learn how the abundance and distribution of species is determined by interactions within and between species and between species and their environment.