Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common condition, especially in the older population, and causes considerable morbidity. Recently, middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has shown promise as a minimally invasive intervention for cSDH by disrupting the flow to the hematoma neomembranes and thus reducing recurrence.

We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting on MMAE for cSDH over the past 30 years. After screening 4103 articles and reviewing 600 full-text studies, 176 studies were selected, including case reports, case series, retrospective and prospective studies and randomized controlled trials. Patient demographics, embolic agents used, frequency, type and severity of complications, hematoma recurrence and need for repeat surgery were extracted from the included studies.

Our analysis included 9780 patients (75.9% male), with mean/median ages ranging from 62.1 to 82.5 years. MMAE-related complications were reported in approximately 3%. Procedure-related neurological complications were the most frequent, followed by systemic complications, access site, non-procedure-related neurological complications, procedure-linked vascular complications specific to MMA and miscellaneous complications. Hematoma recurrence was reported in 6%, and repeat or rescue surgery was necessary in 6.1%. These results are consistent with major clinical trials evaluating MMAE safety and efficacy in cSDH.

Based on current published literature, MMAE appears to be an effective and overall safe treatment option for cSDH. Complications, although infrequent, can occur, and some of these are disabling. Meticulous pre-procedural planning and imaging are essential to reduce the risk of complications.

Adjunctive intraarterial (IA) thrombolysis after endovascular thrombectomy may improve clinical outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke possibly due to improvement in microvascular reperfusion.

We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating IA thrombolysis with tenecteplase, alteplase or urokinase in anterior or posterior circulation LVO stroke after successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b–3). Efficacy outcomes were excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1), functional independence (mRS 0–2) and recovery without any disability (mRS 0) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), any ICH and death. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using random-effects models.

Seven RCTs (n = 2,130; 2022–2025) were included. IA thrombolytic drugs used were alteplase, tenecteplase and urokinase with doses ranging from 10 % to 50% of recommended IV dosage. IA thrombolysis significantly improved excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1: OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.19–1.76) and recovery without any disability (mRS 0: OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09–1.64), without safety risks (symptomatic ICH: 5.05% with IA thrombolytics vs. 4.49% in standard). Paradoxically, there was no difference in functional independence (mRS 0–2) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.99–1.20). Additionally, tenecteplase or alteplase at doses equivalent to 25% or 50% of recommended IV dosage significantly improved excellent functional outcome.

IA thrombolysis offered immediately following EVT with successful reperfusion improved excellent functional outcome and recovery without disability at 90 days with an acceptable safety profile.

In acute ischemic stroke, a longer time from onset to endovascular treatment (EVT) is associated with worse clinical outcome. We investigated the association of clinical outcome with time from last known well to arrival at the EVT hospital and time from hospital arrival to arterial access for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion patients treated > 6 hours from last known well.

Retrospective analysis of the prospective, multicenter cohort study ESCAPE-LATE. Patients presenting > 6 hours after last known well with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT were included. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were good (mRS 0–2) and poor clinical outcomes (mRS 5–6) at 90 days, as well as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours. Associations of time intervals with outcomes were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

Two hundred patients were included in the analysis, of whom 85 (43%) were female. 90-day mRS was available for 141 patients. Of the 150 patients, 135 (90%) had moderate-to-good collaterals, and the median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 8 (IQR = 7–10). No association between ordinal mRS and time from last known well to arrival at the EVT hospital (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.02) or time from hospital arrival to arterial access (OR = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.02–0.00) was seen in adjusted regression models.

No relationship was observed between pre-hospital or in-hospital workflow times and clinical outcomes. Baseline ASPECTS and collateral status were favorable in the majority of patients, suggesting that physicians may have chosen to predominantly treat slow progressors in the late time window, in whom prolonged workflow times have less impact on outcomes.

Numerous studies have shown longer pre-hospital and in-hospital workflow times and poorer outcomes in women after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in general and after endovascular treatment (EVT) in particular. We investigated sex differences in acute stroke care of EVT patients over 5 years in a comprehensive Canadian provincial registry.

Clinical data of all AIS patients who underwent EVT between January 2017 and December 2022 in the province of Saskatchewan were captured in the Canadian OPTIMISE registry and supplemented with patient data from administrative data sources. Patient baseline characteristics, transport time metrics, and technical EVT outcomes between female and male EVT patients were compared.

Three-hundred-three patients underwent EVT between 2017 and 2022: 144 (47.5%) women and 159 (52.5%) men. Women were significantly older (median age 77.5 [interquartile range: 66–85] vs.71 [59–78], p < 0.001), while men had more intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions (48/159 [30.2%] vs. 26/142 [18.3%], p = 0.03). Last-known-well to comprehensive stroke center (CSC)-arrival time (median 232 min [interquartile range 90–432] in women vs. 230 min [90–352] in men), CSC-arrival-to-reperfusion time (median 108 min [88–149] in women vs. 102 min [77–141] in men), reperfusion status (successful reperfusion 106/142 [74.7%] in women vs. 117/158 [74.1%] in men) as well as modified Rankin score at 90 days did not differ significantly. This held true after adjusting for baseline variables in multivariable analyses.

While women undergoing EVT in the province of Saskatchewan were on average older than men, they were treated just as fast and achieved similar technical and clinical outcomes compared to men.

Decisions to treat large-vessel occlusion with endovascular therapy (EVT) or intravenous alteplase depend on how physicians weigh benefits against risks when considering patients’ comorbidities. We explored EVT/alteplase decision-making by stroke experts in the setting of comorbidity/disability.

In an international multi-disciplinary survey, experts chose treatment approaches under current resources and under assumed ideal conditions for 10 of 22 randomly assigned case scenarios. Five included comorbidities (cancer, cardiac/respiratory/renal disease, mild cognitive impairment [MCI], physical dependence). We examined scenario/respondent characteristics associated with EVT/alteplase decisions using multivariable logistic regressions.

Among 607 physicians (38 countries), EVT was chosen less often in comorbidity-related scenarios (79.6% under current resources, 82.7% assuming ideal conditions) versus six “level-1A” scenarios for which EVT/alteplase was clearly indicated by current guidelines (91.1% and 95.1%, respectively, odds ratio [OR] [current resources]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.31–0.47). However, EVT was chosen more often in comorbidity-related scenarios compared to all other 17 scenarios (79.6% versus 74.4% under current resources, OR: 1.34, 1.17–1.54). Responses favoring alteplase for comorbidity-related scenarios (e.g. 75.0% under current resources) were comparable to level-1A scenarios (72.2%) and higher than all others (60.4%). No comorbidity independently diminished EVT odds when considering all scenarios. MCI and dependence carried higher alteplase odds; cancer and cardiac/respiratory/renal disease had lower odds. Being older/female carried lower EVT odds. Relevant respondent characteristics included performing more EVT cases/year (higher EVT-, lower alteplase odds), practicing in East Asia (higher EVT odds), and in interventional neuroradiology (lower alteplase odds vs neurology).

Moderate-to-severe comorbidities did not consistently deter experts from EVT, suggesting equipoise about withholding EVT based on comorbidities. However, alteplase was often foregone when respondents chose EVT. Differences in decision-making by patient age/sex merit further study.