Most patients with long-term conditions (LTC) receive regular blood tests to monitor disease progression and response to treatment and to detect complications. There is currently no robust evidence to inform recommendations on monitoring. Creating this evidence base is challenging because the benefits and harms of testing are dependent on what is done in response to the test results.

We identified a list of commonly used tests. We defined a series of filtering questions to determine whether there was evidence to support the rationale of monitoring, such as “Can the general practitioner do anything in response to an abnormal test result?” Through a series of rapid reviews we identified evidence to answer each question. The evidence was presented at a consensus meeting where clinicians and patients voted for inclusion, exclusion, or further analysis. A process evaluation was performed alongside this. Further analyses were performed using routinely collected healthcare data and by performing incidence analyses, emulating randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and modeling disease progression.

We tested this methodology on three common LTCs: chronic kidney disease (CKD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and hypertension. We found sufficient evidence to include hemoglobin A1C and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for monitoring patients with T2DM; hemoglobin and eGFR for patients with CKD; and eGFR for patients with hypertension. The consensus panel excluded four tests, while 10 tests were selected for further analysis. The emulated RCTs will investigate the effect of regular monitoring with certain tests on health outcomes among routinely monitored patients. In addition, we will investigate the signal-to-noise ratio of each test over time using a modeling approach.

The cost effectiveness of the evidence-based testing panels needs to be tested in clinical practice. We are currently developing an intervention package and are planning to run a feasibility trial. This program of work has the potential to change how LTCs are monitored in primary care, ultimately improving patient outcomes and leading to more efficient use of healthcare resources.

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is characterized by pathologically enlarged ventricles without elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure along with a triad of clinical symptoms including gait disturbances, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment. NPH is evaluated with lumbar drain trials (LDTs) where CSF is removed over several days to determine if patients would benefit from ventricular shunting. Candidate selection and success for these surgeries remains challenging because other diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) share common features with NPH in cognitive impairment and enlarged ventricles. Prior research has found that 20%-40% of presumed NPH cases have AD pathology as determined by brain biopsy or autopsy. CSF biomarkers of AD can be altered in NPH and are not always conclusive, complicating the interpretation of results when formulating diagnoses and prognoses. Studies to refine the analyses of AD CSF biomarkers in NPH are needed. We aimed to examine the frequency of CSF biomarker results among patients presenting for NPH evaluations with LDTs.

62 patients presented for LDTs upon physician recommendations. CSF specimens were sent to Mayo Clinic Laboratories for Alzheimer Disease Evaluation (ADEVL) that utilizes Elecsys (Lenexa, KS) CSF electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) to measure levels of amyloid-beta 42 (Aβ42), total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylatedtau (p-tau), and p-tau:Aβ42 ratio. Results were classified based on interpretation through the Amyloid/Tau/Neurodegeneration (ATN) framework1: 1) AD - biomarker profile consistent with AD pathologic change, 2) non-AD profile - biomarker levels normal or inconsistent with AD pathologic change, or 3) indeterminate - biomarkers were incongruous with only one or two abnormal levels of Aβ42, t-tau, p-tau, or ptau: Aβ42. Indeterminate cases may represent altered protein levels due to CSF dynamics or AD-related pathologic change. In reviewing recent research on CSF dynamics and AD biomarkers in NPH2 a p-tau threshold of 15 pg/mL was derived and implemented such that cases with Aß42 <=1026 pg/mL and p-tau <15 pg/mL were designated as suspected non-AD, and those with Aß42 <=1026 pg/mL and p-tau >15 pg/mL were designated suspected AD.

Of the 62 LDT cases, 12 (19.35%) were classified as AD, 31 (50%) were indeterminate and 22 (35.48%) were non-AD. Of the 31 indeterminate cases, 21 (33.87% of the overall sample) were suspected non-AD and 7 (11.29% of the full sample) were categorized as suspected AD.

Our findings show that 20%-30% of patients presenting for LDT showed evidence for AD-type pathologic change, consistent with prior reports of AD pathology in cases of possible NPH. Half of all LDT cases had indeterminate AD CSF biomarker results, the interpretations of which were confounded by the potential alterations of CSF biomarkers levels due to NPH independent of AD. Our findings emphasize the need to establish better approaches to interpreting CSF AD biomarkers in evaluating NPH. Future research should examine the discriminative utility of CSF AD biomarkers and the selected p-tau threshold in indeterminate cases for predicting response to LDT and shunting.

School lunches represent a key opportunity to improve diets and health of schoolchildren. No recent nationally representative studies have examined the nutritional differences between school meals and packed lunches in the UK. This study aimed to characterise and compare the nutritional quality of school meals and packed lunches among primary and secondary school-age children.

A pooled cross-sectional analysis of the UK’s National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008–2017).

United Kingdom.

3001 children (aged 4–16 years) who completed a 3/4-d food diary which recorded meal type (school meal/packed lunch). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations of meeting food and nutrient recommendations by meal type. Analyses were stratified by academic key stages (KS).

KS-1 (4–7 years) and 2 (8–11 years) children consuming school meals were more likely to meet minimum recommendations for vegetables, protein-rich foods and fibre, and not exceed maximum recommendations for salt, savoury and sweet snacks compared with pupils consuming packed lunches. However, in KS-3 (12–14 years) and 4 (14–16 years), these effects were reduced. As children aged, the median weight of fruits, vegetables, protein-rich foods and dairy products consumed typically decreased for both school meals and packed lunches, and generally an increasing proportion of school meals contained sweet and savoury snacks.

These findings suggest school meals are nutritionally superior to packed lunches but are not yet optimal. Quality declined at higher KS. Actions to improve lunches of primary and secondary schoolchildren across the UK are needed, with attention to KS-3 and 4 in secondary schools.

Registry-based trials have emerged as a potentially cost-saving study methodology. Early estimates of cost savings, however, conflated the benefits associated with registry utilisation and those associated with other aspects of pragmatic trial designs, which might not all be as broadly applicable. In this study, we sought to build a practical tool that investigators could use across disciplines to estimate the ranges of potential cost differences associated with implementing registry-based trials versus standard clinical trials.

We built simulation Markov models to compare unique costs associated with data acquisition, cleaning, and linkage under a registry-based trial design versus a standard clinical trial. We conducted one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, varying study characteristics over broad ranges, to determine thresholds at which investigators might optimally select each trial design.

Registry-based trials were more cost effective than standard clinical trials 98.6% of the time. Data-related cost savings ranged from $4300 to $600,000 with variation in study characteristics. Cost differences were most reactive to the number of patients in a study, the number of data elements per patient available in a registry, and the speed with which research coordinators could manually abstract data. Registry incorporation resulted in cost savings when as few as 3768 independent data elements were available and when manual data abstraction took as little as 3.4 seconds per data field.

Registries offer important resources for investigators. When available, their broad incorporation may help the scientific community reduce the costs of clinical investigation. We offer here a practical tool for investigators to assess potential costs savings.

Prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a national priority and may be facilitated by deployment of the Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) Strategy, a quality improvement framework providing a focused approach to infection prevention. This article describes the process and outcomes of TAP Strategy implementation for CDI prevention in a healthcare system.

Hospital A was identified based on CDI surveillance data indicating an excess burden of infections above the national goal; hospitals B and C participated as part of systemwide deployment. TAP facility assessments were administered to staff to identify infection control gaps and inform CDI prevention interventions. Retrospective analysis was performed using negative-binomial, interrupted time series (ITS) regression to assess overall effect of targeted CDI prevention efforts. Analysis included hospital-onset, laboratory-identified C. difficile event data for 18 months before and after implementation of the TAP facility assessments.

The systemwide monthly CDI rate significantly decreased at the intervention (β2, −44%; P = .017), and the postintervention CDI rate trend showed a sustained decrease (β1 + β3; −12% per month; P = .008). At an individual hospital level, the CDI rate trend significantly decreased in the postintervention period at hospital A only (β1 + β3, −26% per month; P = .003).

This project demonstrates TAP Strategy implementation in a healthcare system, yielding significant decrease in the laboratory-identified C. difficile rate trend in the postintervention period at the system level and in hospital A. This project highlights the potential benefit of directing prevention efforts to facilities with the highest burden of excess infections to more efficiently reduce CDI rates.