We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
What makes a text generically trans? A central plank of the term ‘transgender’ and prefixial ‘trans’ was a genre shift. After the modernist and transsexual fixation on autobiography and medical case studies, trans writing was meant to play on a far more open semiotic field. Whether that transformation took place, however, is a matter of debate. If ‘trans’ as the denotive for a genre of writing remains vague and not very well distinguished from its cousin ‘queer,’ and so trans still generates few genres beyond the first person, perhaps the issue is not the narratological genealogy of trans, but an unspoken racial haunting of the very same, a presence that is unspoken even as it is explicitly conjured and exorcised. This chapter investigates three recent works of trans genre—Torrey Peters’s Detransition, Baby, Jordy Rosenberg’s Confessions of the Fox, and T. Fleischmann’s Time is the Thing A Body Moves Through—to propose an undisclosed inter-racial relation that trans conventionally serves to cover over. The foundational relation of trans genre may prove to be the white trans author to the trans woman of color, she who occupies the text through either absence or idealization.
The medicalization of transgender and nonbinary people is framed by an impossible drama. The demand for health care, particularly the medical and psychological care associated with transition, has since the mid-twentieth-century emergence of the contemporary diagnostic model required nothing less than the assertion of life and death stakes. The predominant architects of the medical model then called transsexuality, such as endocrinologist Harry Benjamin, stressed that offering hormones and surgery to trans people was a form of last resort. Writing in 1967, Benjamin polemicized that ‘untreated transsexuals are among the most miserable people I have ever met’. Claiming their ‘extreme unhappiness’ inevitably ‘brings them to the verge of suicide or self-mutilation’, Benjamin's ostensibly compassionate plea to his peers was simple: ‘sex reassignment surgery can truly save lives’. Over fifty years later, despite the tidal shifts in trans visibility and the delivery of health care in the United States, this logic of urgency and the spectre of death has hardly disappeared. Today, the twinned emergencies of the murder of Black and brown trans women and the suicide rate of trans people overall are frequently invoked as the moral and political imperative behind making trans health care delivery more accessible and competent. The ostensibly lifesaving purpose of transgender health care remains its primary drama.
This narrative drama is perhaps nowhere more heightened than in the case of transgender children, whose potential suicides are often invoked against the backdrop of various efforts under way to legally ban, administratively curtail and socially isolate them from possibilities of affirming their gender identities and living in even the most basic safety. Yet the increased targeting of children's access to health care in a wider political and cultural war over trans people is occurring at precisely the same moment that the diffuse, heterogeneous landscape of transgender health care is also undergoing one of its most profound historical shifts. The conditional, pathologizing model of transsexuality constructed by Benjamin and his peers is now being recast as what is called the gender affirming or trans affirmative model of care. This shift away from medical providers as evaluators of trans people's diagnostic worthiness and towards the default granting of whatever mental and physical care to which they might consent is an immense transition of its own.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.