We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The full-scale invasion of Ukraine brought with it the criminalization of the free press in Russia and the bullying of independent reporters, exemplified by a red paint attack against Dmitry Muratov, one of the country’s foremost newspaper editors. The paint attack belongs to a cluster of wartime scenarios that make fluid use of “fake” blood and whose primary actors are not Kremlin cronies but antiwar protestors.
This chapter examines the wave of smaller performing arts festivals in North America and Europe that emerged at the turn of the twenty-first century. The author argues that this ‘second wave’ of international performing arts festivals prefigured the potential for new social relationships and artistic processes and shifted the event horizon around what constitutes a festival performance. To chart the ‘second wave’ is to diagram larger, systemic transformations from the cultural to creative industries, the rise of the ‘creative city’, and the rupturing of progressive social movements. This chapter links the imaginative realm of site-specific, socially engaged work and the activist realm of movement-building to explore how new forms of relational play exceed the very time of festival. If once international performing arts festivals were recruited to rebuild relations between nations, and later enrolled to bolster the economies of cities, ‘second-wave’ festivals have also shown that they can redistribute their resources to communities and support forms of belonging organized around the practice of place rather than its territorial claim over it.
100% Vancouver was created by Rimini Protokoll and produced in 2011 by Theatre Replacement as part of the PuSh Festival. One hundred Vancouver residents performed a statistical portrait of the city based on Canada's 2006 mandatory long-form census. In this article, I set out to understand how a show that felt so local is part of a global project and a transposable dramaturgy that is designed to be tented anywhere. I explore this seeming paradox in 100% Vancouver because it self-consciously shared the stage with a corporate sponsor connected to the globalizing force of finance capitalism. I propose that this transparent redistribution of artistic capital to corporations that deal in finance capital is not a capitulation to the market. Rather, it is a social relationship with the market. 100% Vancouver demonstrates how contemporary citizen-led performance is a battleground for declining and dominant visions of governmentality that range from welfare government to finance capitalism.
On 4 July 2012, the skies over Ivyanets – a small town 70 kilometres outside Minsk, the capital of Belarus – changed unpredictably. Brown teddy bears attached to parachutes canopied the streets and demanded the attention of the locals. The bears clutched protest signs in English and Belarusian between their paws: ‘You cannot silence us’ and ‘Free speech now’. The airdrop, initially bound for Minsk, was meant to scatter free-speech signs over the presidential palace of dictator Alexander Lukashenko. Since 1994, Lukashenko has maintained his grip on power through such repressive tactics as censorship, vote-rigging and state violence. He operates as if the Iron Curtain that divided east and west Europe during the Cold War had never been lifted, and continues to run the country like a Soviet state. This includes the use of military and police – including the secret KGB service – to silence citizens who question his regime. At the hands of Lukashenko, Belarus' most prominent opposition leaders, journalists, political activists, lawyers, academics and artists have faced imprisonment and torture, ‘disappeared’ without warning and ‘committed suicide’ on the eve of presidential elections. The unlikely campaigners of the more than 800 teddy-bear airdrop were not, however, Belarusian citizens. They were Studio Total, a Swedish advertising firm, who describe their action as ‘a performance to support democracy in Belarus’. This performance from above prevented a direct encounter with the despotic regime from below. It was at street level that a Belarusian journalism student, 20-year-old Anton Suryapin, did what young people just about everywhere do and posted the images online. This banal act of post-and-circulate resulted in the forced detention of Suryapin by the KGB, who now accuse the student of ‘assisting illegal entry’. Studio Total had illegally crossed into Belarusian airspace to campaign for Charter 97, an online organization that reports human rights abuses from inside Belarus, and the authors of the country's 1996 ‘Declaration of Resistance against Belarusian Dictatorship’.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.