Traditional therapies are crucial in maintaining and improving human well-being. China’s healthcare policymakers are attempting to use health technology assessment (HTA) as a decision-making supportive tool. The value assessment framework for Chinese patent medicine (CPM) has been developed and is being adopted and validated widely by research institutions. Subsequently, the healthcare decision-makers particularly hanker for the value framework of traditional non-pharmacological therapies.

To construct a practical value framework for traditional non-pharmacological therapies, a scoping review methodology was adopted to identify the evaluation domains and obstacles. A search, screening, and analysis process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Evidence was retrieved from scientific databases and HTA agencies’ websites.

The search strategy identified 5 guidelines records and 17 acupuncture HTA reports. By synthesizing the valuable reports of CPM and acupuncture evaluation in representative countries, this study found that Mainland China was promoting the comprehensive value assessment of CPM, whereas the United Kingdom, Singapore, Canada, the United States, and Malaysia had carried out the HTA evaluation of acupuncture for various conditions among which chronic pain was the most common. UK and Singapore applied the HTA results to support acupuncture reimbursement decisions. Three domains, including safety, effectiveness, and economy, were commonly adopted. The identified biggest challenge of evaluating traditional non-pharmacological therapies is the scarce high-quality clinical evidence.

This study identified value domains and issues of traditional therapies, and pointed out future research implications, to promote the development value framework of traditional therapies.

According to the World Health Organization, there were approximately 0.5 million new cases of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in 2018, of which 78 percent were multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), and China has one of the largest shares of the global burden (14%). In recent years, the Chinese government has made progress in TB control and prevention, but for MDR-TB, treatment options are still limited and expensive, and novel drugs are not always available. This research aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding bedaquiline to a background regimen (BR) of drugs for MDR-TB treatment in China, and to provide evidence for government to improve public health policies.

A cohort-based Markov model was developed to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of bedaquiline plus BR (BBR) versus BR alone in MDR-TB treatment, over a 10-year time horizon. Data were sourced from a phase II clinical trial, real-world data in China, published literature, and expert opinion. Outcomes were evaluated in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life-years gained (LYG). The discount rate was 3.5%. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

The discounted costs per person for BBR was CNY 135,706 [USD 19,172], compared with CNY 92,465 [USD 13,063] for BR. The discounted utility per person for BBR was also higher than that for BR (3.943 QALYs versus 3.193 QALYs). The ICER of BBR was CNY 58,096 [USD 8,208]/QALY, which was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of CNY 212,676 [USD 30,046] (three-times the gross domestic product per capita). Therefore, BBR was considered to be cost-effective. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. BBR remained cost-effective in the sensitivity analysis, with a 77.2 percent probability of being cost-effective versus BR.

In China, bedaquiline is not included in the National Reimbursement Medicine List, which results in a heavy financial burden for MDR-TB patients. From this study, BBR was cost-effective by significantly reducing time to sputum culture conversion and increasing QALYs and LYGs, which offset the higher drug costs.

The scientific application of clinical evidence-based guidelines can reduce the variability of clinical practice, and standardize clinical diagnosis and treatment pathways. At present, many evidence-based guidelines on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) prevention have been issued in countries around the world, but the procedures and evaluation strategies developed by different guidelines are not the same. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) relating to COPD using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.

Databases were systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Wan Fang, and CNKI as well as guidelines websites on COPD prevention and treatment. The search period was from inception of the database up to May 2019. The inclusion criteria for this study are as follows: (i) published and in accordance with the definition of the practice guidelines; (ii)the main target population is COPD patients with the diagnostic criteria of the 2019 edition of the global initiative for COPD (GOLD), and the content of the guideline is related to the prevention and treatment practice of COPD; (ii) the same guide is included in the latest updated version; (iv) the published language is English or Chinese. Guidelines that met these inclusion criteria were evaluated for the quality of the AGREE II guidelines. Then, a descriptive analysis was made of the consensus that exists in the guidelines.

A total of fifteen guidelines/Consensuses Statements were included in the study. Two guidelines were assessed as recommended, eleven guidelines were assessed as recommended with modifications and two guidelines were not recommended. The mean scores of the included guidelines in the six domains (scope and purpose, personnel involved in guideline development, rigor of development, clarity, applicability, independence) were 90 percent, 72 percent, 49 percent, 96 percent, 60 percent, 69 percent, respectively. Thus, the study identified a consensus that disease risk factors and recommended interventions were mentioned in the guidelines, and that they comprehensively evaluated the quality of guideline reporting to provide reference for standardizing the development of practice guidelines for COPD in China.

The overall methodological quality of COPD CPGs should be improved. The key recommended areas for improvement include standardization of guideline report writing and synthesis of the latest and best evidence, to develop CPGs for COPD to improve the quality of clinical diagnosis and treatment for COPD.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a common disease that causes pain and affects productivity. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) like adalimumab can bring better clinical efficacy and improve quality of life. Adalimumab is likely to be covered by health insurance. It is necessary to assess the impact of adalimumab for patients with AS on the medical insurance budget in China. Our research aims to give support evidence for policy-making.

From the perspective of medical insurance payers, a budget impact model was established to evaluate the impact of adalimumab for the treatment of adults with severe active AS that has responded inadequately to conventional therapy. The time horizon was 5 years (2020–2024). The cost of measurement included drug and treatment costs for adverse events. Scenario analysis was conducted to evaluate the results under different drug price reimbursement ratios and treatment ratios.

Based on the current price of adalimumab (CNY 3,160 [USD 446]/unit), under the reimbursement ratio of 70 percent, adalimumab will increase medical insurance expenditure by CNY 162 [USD 22] million, CNY 152 [USD 21] million, CNY 114 [USD 16] million, CNY 100 [USD 14] million and CNY 88.11 [USD 12] million in the next 1–5 years, respectively. The increased medical insurance expenditure accounts for 0.091, 0.085, 0.064, 0.056, and 0.049 percent of the annual medical insurance expenditure in the next 1–5 years, respectively, which is assumed to be equivalent to the expenditure in 2018 of CNY 1782.2 [USD 251] billion.

The budget impact of adalimumab for AS on medical insurance expenditure is limited, and including adalimumab in the medical insurance catalogue can reduce the burden on individuals, enrich treatment options, and satisfy clinical needs better.

Malignant tumors have become a major public health problem and their treatment cost is increasing rapidly in China, but treatment aimed at healing diseases or extending patients’ life. There is little empirical research on utilization of healthcare resources of terminally ill cancer patients. In order to explore the optimal treatment decision for patients and provide information for relevant decision makers, this study analyzed the consumption status of medical resources in patients with cancer during the whole treatment period, and the current medical resource utilization efficiency in different levels of hospital for end-stage cancer patients.

This study was based on the clinical treatment and payment data of 2,536 cases of patients with lung cancer from the medical insurance database during the period of 2007 to 2014 in Hubei province. We retrospectively analyzed patients’ medical expenditure and utilization of different medical resources during their whole treatment period as well as at the end stage.

The per capita inpatient expenditures of patients under 50 years old was 193,000 CNY (27,451 USD), while that of the patients over 70 years were 80,000–90,000 CNY (11,379–12,802 USD). Secondly, the medical expenditures spent during the last 6 months of life accounted for 66.1 percent of the total expenditures. Lastly, the medical expenditure spent in tertiary hospitals accounted for 95.3 percent of the total expenditure, and the expenditure was 14,200 ± 17,030 CNY (2,019.82 ± 2,422.36 USD) per visit.

Population aging is not the only factor causing the rise of medical expenditure. The unclear objectives of treatment and the reverse of medical resource allocation are also important factors to boost the growth of medical expenditure. It is necessary to improve the healthcare insurance payment system, strengthen the capacity of primary medical institutions, and develop the palliative care system in China.

Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), remarkable achievements have been made in poverty alleviation. Over the past five years, the population of people living in poverty had decreased by 68.53million, fallen from 98.99 million in 2012 to 30.46 million at the end of 2017. As an impoverished province, Hebei province has been implementing the CPC Central Committee's guidance in the battle against poverty. In 2016, the government released the Implementation Scheme Plan for Improving the Level of Medical Security and Assistance. The plan introduces multi-layer medical security and assistance mechanisms which covers basic medical insurance, major disease insurance and medical assistance. In 2017, the government formulated the Implementation Plan for the Three-Batch Action Plan on the Health Care Program for Poverty Alleviation in Hebei Province, for people with major disease. Hebei Province has carried out many explorations on the health care program for poverty alleviation, and its effectiveness is a problem worthy of attention.

Based on data including basic medical insurance, major illness insurance, medical assistance, and other related information, we used descriptive statistics and quantitative methods to evaluate the overall expenditure of the poverty alleviation for Hebei province and the areas under its jurisdiction. Additionally, the expenditure of different levels of medical security system, the medical burden for people facing poverty and the distribution of disease in the population with assistance were evaluated.

The out-of-pocket payment per capita has decreased year by year, and it has dropped to 3% of catastrophic medical expenditure and 20% below the poverty line by June 2018. An imbalanced situation occurred with the implementation, with the more impoverished areas having greater the pressure on medical care and poverty alleviation. For people with medical assistance, diseases with higher population and overall expenditure are cerebrovascular disease, malignant tumor, diabetes and some other chronic diseases.

The health policies for poverty alleviation in Hebei province has achieved a remarkable success, and the medical burden of the poor has been significantly reduced. However, the implementation of the policies in various cities has shown an imbalanced situation, and the poverty alleviation policies need to be further improved.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, life-threatening, and seriously debilitating neuromuscular disorder, which has a heavy burden on patients, caregivers and the health system. Technological advances have improved clinical effect, but have also increased the financial burden. There is limited information in the literature on the resource utilization and economic burden of SMA. Our research aims to summarize the current literature on resource use, cost and economic evaluations of treatments for SMA, to inform further research and policy decision making.

Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CRD Database, were searched from inception. Two reviewers undertook title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening, and any disagreement was resolved in consensus. Data extraction was conducted using a customized form. Included studies were summarized using narrative synthesis structured around general and economic characteristics. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were adhered to where applicable.

We reviewed 552 abstracts and included twenty-six from 2015 to 2019. Four-fifths were published in the United States and Europe. Five full economic evaluations and one budget impact analysis compared nusinersen with AVXS-101 or best supportive care, and the remaining evaluated the economic burden of SMA. The most common outcomes were healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs, only a few studies evaluated direct non-medical costs or indirect cost.

SMA patients have significant medical expenditures and high utilization of healthcare services, including nusinersen-treated patients. The results highlight the substantial burden of treatment for SMA, not only for patients but also for their caregivers. SMA represents a significant hidden cost that society should be made aware of, and that should be considered in the design, implementation and evaluation of support programs for people who suffer from this disease and their families, as well as in the economic evaluation of new treatments.

Since 2009, China has initiated a national program on free provision of essential public health services. The national program has expanded both in terms of service categories and funding, showing China's great commitment to universal health coverage. However, with slowdown of public input in the health sector, the government decided to prioritize interventions and optimize reimbursement packages. Researchers in the China National Health Development Research Center (CNHDRC)—the Chinese national health technology assessment (HTA) agency were asked to design the tools to facilitate the decision process.

With multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method, the researchers analyzed value dimensions in public health issues, and built an evidence matrix for the priority-setting decisions. Supported by HTA tools, they appraised interventions and services through literature review and field studies, and projected budget impact of potential adjustment decisions based on cost analysis results. A deliberative process of key stakeholder groups was taken, and their views were counted in making the final recommendations.

Based on evidence review and scores of stakeholders’ judgment, two public health service interventions were recommended for removal, and another two for adjustment (one for merger, one for optimizing care pathway). Cost estimation and potential budgetary impact were also analyzed to support financial decisions.

HTA and MCDA are key tools for defining the value criteria, evidence framework, and deliberative process for the essential public health program. However, lack of cost-effectiveness evidence hinders fine-tuned decisions on resource allocation. Continual health economic evaluation needs to be conducted in the near future.