This is a qualitative evaluation of a simulation/debrief based training session to address discrimination in an NHS workplace, delivered to psychiatry trainees. Videos portraying discrimination acted as the simulation, followed by a diamond model informed debrief.

This evaluation aimed to:

• • assess the effectiveness of this training session in terms raising awareness of discrimination, problematising discrimination, empowerment to act and skills building

• • explore the extent to which these stated aims are relevant to participants’ experience of discrimination, harassment and bullying at work

• • establish if this is a meaningful and acceptable training model for this topic

• • establish if there are more relevant themes that this training session should be focusing on and if so, what these are?

A total of 8 trainees were interviewed between December 2022 and May 2023, having recently completed the training. A thematic analysis was undertaken by two researchers following established recommendations, seeking to bring out latent themes with an inductive, interpretative approach within a constructionist paradigm.

Trainees attended with existing knowledge, skills and attitudes about discrimination, harassment and bullying, and about the training session itself.

Both the simulation and debrief were valued by trainees. The debrief was more than just a discussion. Portrayals of discrimination in the videos/simulation could have been more subtle, and tackled a more diverse range of examples such as LGBTQ+.

The learning objectives were largely met, and related to real challenges that trainees face. Trainees took away more than this, citing learning related to team cohesion and developing their sense in which discrimination in the context of mental illness requires special consideration.

This model of training is providing good value in addressing a topic of strategic importance in a novel way. The impact on empowerment and skills development is likely to be particularly valuable in impacting real world responses to workplace experiences of discrimination. Promoting team cohesion and a space to thoughtfully consider the special case of discrimination in the context of mental illness are important additional benefits. The simulation/debrief model is likely to be crucial, providing learning which would be inaccessible to didactic or e-learning based modes of delivery. The simulation materials may be improved by depicting LGBTQ+ issues, and a more subtle portrayal of discrimination. While this evaluation was situated in a psychiatric context, it could have wide applicability to tackling similar challenges throughout NHS workplaces.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) prevalence is expected to increase in East Africa as treatment coverage increases, survival improves, and this population ages. This study aimed to better understand the current cognitive phenotype of this newly emergent population of older combination antiretroviral therapy (cART)-treated people living with HIV (PLWH), in which current screening measures lack accuracy. This will facilitate the refinement of HAND cognitive screening tools for this setting.

This is a secondary analysis of 253 PLWH aged ≥50 years receiving standard government HIV clinic follow-up in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. They were evaluated with a detailed locally normed low-literacy neuropsychological battery annually on three occasions and a consensus panel diagnosis of HAND by Frascati criteria based on clinical evaluation and collateral history.

Tests of verbal learning and memory, categorical verbal fluency, visual memory, and visuoconstruction had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.7 for symptomatic HAND (s-HAND) (0.70–0.72; p < 0.001 for all tests). Tests of visual memory, verbal learning with delayed recall and recognition memory, psychomotor speed, language comprehension, and categorical verbal fluency were independently associated with s-HAND in a logistic mixed effects model (p < 0.01 for all). Neuropsychological impairments varied by educational background.

A broad range of cognitive domains are affected in older, well-controlled, East African PLWH, including those not captured in widely used screening measures. It is possible that educational background affects the observed cognitive impairments in this setting. Future screening measures for similar populations should consider assessment of visual memory, verbal learning, language comprehension, and executive and motor function.

Common mental disorders (CMDs), particularly depression, are major contributors to the global mental health burden. South Asia, while diverse, has cultural, social, and economic challenges, which are common across the region, not least an aging population. This creates an imperative to better understand how CMD affects older people in this context, which relies on valid and culturally appropriate screening and research tools. This review aims to scope the availability of CMD screening tools for older people in South Asia. As a secondary aim, this review will summarize the use of these tools in epidemiology, and the extent to which they have been validated or adapted for this population.

A scoping review was performed, following PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy was developed iteratively in Medline and translated to Embase, PsychInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science. Data were extracted from papers in which a tool was used to identify CMD in a South Asian older population (50+), including validation, adaptation, and use in epidemiology. Validation studies meeting the criteria were critically appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies – version 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

Of the 4694 papers identified, 176 met the selection criteria at full-text screening as relevant examples of diagnostic or screening tool use. There were 15 tool validation studies, which were critically appraised. Of these, 10 were appropriate to evaluate as diagnostic tests. All of these tools assessed for depression. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-based tools were predominant with variable diagnostic accuracy across different settings. Methodological issues were substantial based on the QUADAS-2 criteria. In the epidemiological studies identified (n = 160), depression alone was assessed for 82% of the studies. Tools lacking cultural validation were commonly used (43%).

This review identifies a number of current research gaps including a need for culturally relevant validation studies, and attention to other CMDs such as anxiety.