Introduction: The organizational readiness for change assessment survey (ORCA) is a tool to assess a site’s readiness for implementation and identify barriers to change. As the “Kicking CAUTI” antibiotic stewardship intervention rolled out on a national scale, we administered ORCA surveys to participating sites to capture baseline actionable information about differences among sites, to inform implementation. Methods: ORCA surveys were distributed by email to prescribing providers, nurses, pharmacists, infection preventionists, and quality managers at 40 participating VA Hospitals. VA hospital sites who submitted three or more surveys and their complexity level (measured as Level 1 (highest)-3) were included in the analysis. The highest complexity level facilities are those with the largest patient volume/risk, teaching and research, along with the largest number of physician specialists and contain at least five ICUs. Mean Likert scores were calculated for each of the 7 ORCA subscales on a scale of 1-5 (5 highest), and the mean of the 7 subscales was the overall ORCA score for a site. Non-parametric testing was performed comparing overall ORCA and each subscale based on complexity. Results: Among the participating sites, 30/40 (75%) completed at least three surveys, with a total of 202 surveys included for analysis, with 82% of surveys coming from higher complexity centers (Level 1). The highest ranked ORCA domain was the evidence subscale (measures perceived strength of evidence), mean 4.2, (SD 0.7). The lowest ranked ORCA domain across sites was resources (available to facilitate implementation), mean 3.3 (SD 0.9). Higher complexity centers had a significantly higher overall ORCA score than lower complexity centers (Level 1 or 2 vs. Level 3, p= 0.02). This difference was driven by the subscales evidence (p < 0 .01), leadership (p =0.05), measurement (p= 0.06), and resources (p=0.07) all being higher in the higher complexity facilities (Figure 1). Two of the categories (leadership and measurement) pertain to an organization’s leaders ability to create an environment for change to occur as well as promoting team building. Conclusions: The lowest scoring ORCA domain across all sites was the respondents’ perception of resources (staff, training) available for achieving change. Perceived resources were also lower in lower complexity sites, implying that medical centers of lower complexity may have higher barriers when implementing an antimicrobial stewardship intervention. This finding highlights the benefit of a national stewardship campaign that provides support to lower complexity medical centers that may not otherwise receive targeted training and support for their efforts.

Disclosure: Barbara Trautner: Stock: Abbvie--sold in December 2023; Abbott Laboratories--sold in December 2023; -Bristol Myers Squibb--sold in December 2023; Pfizer--sold in December 2023; Consultant--Phiogen--consultant. Contracted research through NIAID for STRIVE trial, currently testing Shionogi product; Contracted research--Peptilogics; Contracted research—Genentech

Background: Non-prescription antibiotic use is defined as taking antibiotics without medical guidance, which includes using leftover antibiotics, obtaining antibiotics from friends or relatives, or purchasing antibiotics without a prescription. This study aimed to (1) determine the symptoms prompting individuals to use non-prescription antibiotics, identify their sources of acquisition, and document the types of antibiotics utilized, (2) identify any associated side effects, and (3) gain insights into antibiotic storage practices, including whether antibiotics were used beyond their expiration date. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted from January 2020-June 2021 in waiting rooms of six safety-net primary care clinics and two private emergency departments in Houston, Texas. Participants were read survey questions in English or Spanish by a bilingual research coordinator, and their responses to five questions about antibiotic use were recorded. Descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Among the 564 patients surveyed, the median age was 51 (range 19-92). The majority identified as female (72%), Hispanic/Latinx (47%), Black/African American (33%), held a college education (44%), and received public health insurance, such as Medicaid or County Financial Assistance (56%). Of all patients surveyed, 44% (246) reported taking an antibiotic without a prescription and answered questions about associated symptoms. Of all symptoms/illnesses associated with non-prescription use, the most common were sore throat (18%), dental symptoms (16%), and cold/flu (13%). The most common sources for non-prescribed antibiotics were leftover antibiotics (50%), from friends or relatives (31%), and purchased abroad (13%), although 3% had purchased non-prescription antibiotics from a local store or market (Figure 1). The most common antibiotics used were amoxicillin (38%) and penicillin (7%). The reported side effects were stomach pain/upset (24%), nausea and vomiting (19%), allergic reaction (e.g., rash) (14%), and diarrhea (14%). Among 246 participants reporting antibiotic use, 63% reported that the antibiotic they took had been previously prescribed for the same symptom/illness, and 93% had acquired antibiotics in a container, of which 90% reported that the container had an expiration date. Conclusions: Our survey reveals that 63% of individuals who use non-prescription antibiotics were motivated by having received prescribed antibiotics for similar symptoms previously. Leftover antibiotics were the source for half of all non-prescription use. These observations suggest that outpatient antibiotic stewardship campaigns have a window of opportunity at the time of the initial prescription of antibiotics, to focus on providing the shortest course possible, and to deliver antibiotic safe use information at that time. Acknowledgments: Financial Support AHRQ R01HS026901

Disclosure: Barbara Trautner: Stock: Abbvie--sold in December 2023; Abbott Laboratories--sold in December 2023; -Bristol Myers Squibb--sold in December 2023; Pfizer--sold in December 2023; Consultant--Phiogen—consultant. Contracted research through NIAID for STRIVE trial, currently testing Shionogi product; Contracted research--Peptilogics; Contracted research—Genentech

Background: Using antibiotics without medical guidance (non-prescription use) is a potential safety threat to individual and public health. Patients' situations can impact their intentions to use non-prescription antibiotics in the future (intended use). This survey (1) explores the dimensionality of 13 predefined situations to identify ‘summary factor,’ which include conceptually similar situations that influence patients’ intended use of non-prescription antibiotics, and (2) identifies the sociodemographic predictors associated with these summary factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from January 2020–June 2021 in the waiting rooms of six safety-net primary care clinics and two private emergency departments. We used principal component analysis as a data reduction technique and confirmed the factor structure of the situations (identifying three situational summary factors). Multivariate linear regression identified the sociodemographic predictors (e.g., age, gender, race, education, insurance, healthcare system, language preference, birth country, and health literacy) associated with each summary factor. Results: Of the 564 patients surveyed, the majority were female (72%), Hispanic or Latinx (47%), college-educated (44%), and received public health insurance (e.g., Medicaid or County Financial Assistance) (56%). The largest proportion of patients endorsed intended non-prescription antibiotic use for situations involving high doctor visit costs (29.8%), having leftover prescription antibiotics (50.4%), and experiencing symptom relief with prior use of antibiotics (47.5%) (Figure 1). We identified three situational summary factors: (1) perceived barriers to a doctor visit and receiving a prescription (Cronbach’s alpha [α]=0.96), (2) convenience and accessibility of non-prescription antibiotics (α=0.81), and (3) previous symptom relief with antibiotics (α=0.95). After controlling for gender, race, education, insurance, language preference, birth country, and health literacy, our multivariate regression results revealed that younger patients (P < 0 .04) and patients attending the safety-net health system (P < 0 .001) had more intended use of non-prescription antibiotics for all three summary factors (Figure 2). Conclusions: Our study revealed that younger patients and individuals receiving care from the safety-net clinics had an increased risk of intended non-prescription antibiotic use across all summary factors. Future stewardship interventions should consider the types of situations that drive patients' decisions to use antibiotics without a prescription. Interventions aimed at reducing barriers to healthcare (e.g., high costs and long waits associated with doctor appointments) and educating individuals on the risks associated with inappropriate antibiotic use while providing alternative (non-antibiotic) treatment options may reduce antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. Acknowledgments: This work is supported by grant number R01HS026901 from AHRQ and NRSA T-32 (6T32HC10031).

Disclosure: Barbara Trautner: Stock: Abbvie--sold in December 2023; Abbott Laboratories--sold in December 2023; -Bristol Myers Squibb--sold in December 2023; Pfizer--sold in December 2023; Consultant--Phiogen—consultant. Contracted research through NIAID for STRIVE trial, currently testing Shionogi product; Contracted research--Peptilogics; Contracted research--Genentech

Background: Inappropriate urine-culture ordering is associated with increased antibiotic prescribing in myriad care environments, including acute and long-term care. In primary care, where urinary tract infections (UTIs) are commonly encountered, the appropriateness of urine-culture ordering has not been well described. We examined the appropriateness of urine-culture ordering and factors associated with inappropriate urine-culture ordering in primary care. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a previous prospective study that included patients aged ≥18 years presenting with provider-suspected UTI with an accompanying urine culture at 2 safety-net, primary-care clinics in Houston, Texas, between November 2018 and March 2020. Patients with complicated or uncomplicated UTI were included, but those with a urinary catheter and pregnant females were excluded. Urine cultures were considered appropriate if the patient had an evidence-based symptom of UTI (ie, dysuria, frequency, urgency, hematuria, fever, chills, costovertebral angle tenderness, suprapubic, pelvic, or flank pain, or nephrolithiasis) as a diagnostic code or listed in providers’ free-text documentation. Diagnostic codes for symptoms that were not evidence based were grouped into categories based on body system, visit type (eg, routine visit), or sign or symptom clusters. We evaluated the relationships among demographic and clinical factors, the clinic visited, and non–evidence-based diagnostic codes with inappropriately ordered cultures. Results: We examined 870 cultures from 807 patients. Overall, 61.5% of patients were Hispanic (61.5%) and 23% were African American or Black. Also, 70.6% were women; the mean age was 49.2 years (SD, 14.6); and the mean Elixhauser score was 1.9 (SD, 5.4). Among the 870 cultures, 210 (24%) were ordered inappropriately. Dysuria (n = 289), frequency (n = 129), and UTI or cystitis (n = 117) were the most common, evidence-based codes among appropriate cultures. In the adjusted model, the nonteaching clinic (aOR, 6.33) and diagnostic codes comprising the following categories were associated with inappropriate culturing: acute lower back pain (aOR, 5.42), cardiac-related visits (aOR, 2.41), urinary incontinence (aOR, 4.46), routine health visits (aOR, 3.66), urine characteristics (aOR, 14.32), voiding difficulties (aOR, 3.88), and well-woman visits with a gynecological exam or family planning aspect (aOR, 12.27) (all P < .05). Conclusions: This research highlights potential gaps or miscues in provider behavior related to urine culture ordering, and unveiled problematic culturing related to urine characteristics and to routine visits, especially of a gynecological nature. This information can be incorporated into diagnostic stewardship interventions to address misconceptions, and to further explore the reasoning or processes wherein urine cultures are ordered for routine visits.

Financial support: NIAID UM1AI104681

Disclosure: None

Background: Antibiotic use without a prescription (nonprescription use) leads to antibiotic overuse, with negative consequences for patient and public health. We studied whether screening patients for prior nonprescription antibiotic use in the past 12 months predicted their intentions to use them in the future. Methods: A survey asking respondents about prior and intended nonprescription antibiotic use was performed between January 2020 and June 2021 among patients in waiting rooms of 6 public clinics and 2 private emergency departments in economically and socially diverse urban and suburban areas. Respondents were classified as prior nonprescription users if they reported previously taking oral antibiotics without contacting a doctor, dentist, or nurse. Intended use was defined as answering “yes” or “maybe” to the question, “Would you use antibiotics without contacting a doctor, nurse, or dentist?” We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of prior nonprescription antibiotic use in the past 12 months for future intended nonprescription use. Bayes PPV and NPV were also calculated, considering the prevalence of nonprescription antibiotic use (24.8%) in our study. Results: Of the 564 patients surveyed, the median age was 51 years (SD, 19–92), with 72% of patients identifying as female. Most were from the public healthcare system (72.5%). Most respondents identified as Hispanic or Latino(a) (47%) or African American (33%), and 57% received Medicaid or the county financial assistance program. Prior nonprescription use was reported by 246 (43%) of 564 individuals, with 91 (16%) reporting nonprescription use within the previous 12 months. Intention to use nonprescription antibiotics was reported by 140 participants (25%). The sensitivity and specificity of prior nonprescription use in the past 12 months to predict the intention to use nonprescription antibiotics in the future were 75.9% (95% CI, 65.3–84.6) and 91.4% (95% CI, 87.8–94.2), respectively. After the Bayes’ adjustment, the PPV and NPV of prior use to predict future intention were 74.5% (95% CI, 66.7–80.9) and 92.0% (95% CI, 88.7–94.4) (Table 1). Conclusions: These results show that prior nonprescription antibiotic use in the past 12 months predicted the intention to use nonprescription antibiotics in the future (PPV of 75%). As a stewardship effort, we suggest clinicians use a simple question about prior nonprescription antibiotic use in primary-care settings as a screening question for patients at high risk for future nonprescription antibiotic use.

Financial support: HSQR-R 5R01HS026901-04

Disclosure: None

Background: Nonprescription antibiotic use includes taking an antibiotic without medical guidance (eg, leftover antibiotics, antibiotics from friends or relatives, or antibiotics purchased without a prescription). Nonprescription use contributes to antimicrobial resistance, adverse drug reactions, interactions, and superinfections such as Clostridioides difficile colitis. Qualitative studies exploring perspectives regarding nonprescription use among Hispanic patients are lacking. We used the Kilbourne Framework for Advancing Health Disparities Research to identify factors influencing Hispanic patients’ nonprescription use and to organize our findings. Methods: Our study includes Hispanic primary-care clinic patients with different types of health coverage in the Houston metroplex who endorsed nonprescription use in a previous quantitative survey. Semistructured interviews explored the factors promoting nonprescription use in Hispanic adults. Interviews were conducted remotely, in English or Spanish, between May 2020 and October 2021. We used inductive coding and thematic analysis to identify the factors and motives for nonprescription use. Results: Of the 35 Hispanic participants surveyed, 69% were female and between the ages of 27 and 66. All participants had some form of healthcare coverage (eg, Medicare or private insurance, Medicaid, or the county financial assistance program). Participants reported obtaining antibiotics from their own leftover prescriptions and through trusted persons (eg, herbalists, pharmacists, friends/relatives, and others), buying them under the counter in US markets, and purchasing them without a prescription outside the United States. Thematic analysis revealed the factors contributing to nonprescription use (Fig. 1). Themes included beliefs that the ‘doctor visit was unnecessary,’ ‘limited direct access to healthcare’ in the United States (due to limited insurance coverage, high costs of the doctor’s visits and medications, and long clinic wait times), ‘more open indirect access to healthcare’ abroad and under the counter in the United States, and communication difficulties (eg, language barriers with clinicians, perceived staff rudeness, and gaps in health literacy). Figure 2 shows representative quotes across thematic domains. Participants expressed having confidence in medical recommendations from pharmacists and trusted community members in their social networks. Conclusions: Antibiotic stewardship interventions that include pharmacist-driven patient education regarding appropriate antibiotic use may decrease nonprescription antibiotic use in Hispanic communities. Additionally, improving access to care while addressing communication barriers and cultural competency in clinics may improve primary care delivery and reduce potentially unsafe antibiotic use.

Disclosure: None

Background: Taking antibiotics outside the guidance of a clinician (nonprescription use) is a potential safety issue and runs counter to antibiotic stewardship efforts. We identified the symptoms and illnesses and situations that may predispose patients to take antibiotics, and we compared these findings between patients attending public primary care clinics and private emergency departments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between January 2020 and March 2021 in 6 primary care clinics and 2 emergency departments in the United States. We queried patients about 5 symptoms and illnesses (Fig. 1) and 14 situations (Fig. 2) to investigate whether these would lead the patients to take antibiotics without a prescription. We used the χ2 test to compare the symptoms and illnesses and situations between the respondents from public and private healthcare systems. We set the P value for significance at <.025. Results: In total, the survey had 564 respondents (median age, 49.7 years; range, 19–92), and 72% were female. Most respondents identified as either Hispanic or Latina/Latino (46.6%) or African American or Black (33%), followed by White (15.8%), and other (4.6%). Most respondents had visited public clinics (72%). The most common insurance status for our respondents included Medicaid or county financial assistance program (56.6%), followed by private insurance or Medicare (36.7%) and self-pay (6.7%). In public primary care clinics, only 23% had private insurance or Medicare compared to 72.9% in private emergency departments. Of those surveyed, 69% agreed that antibiotics would improve the recovery from sinus infections, followed by bronchitis (64%), sore throat (64%), cold/flu (61.4%), and diarrhea (31.5%). The proportions of respondents who believed that antibiotics would improve the recovery from diarrhea (36.2% vs 19.4%; P = .004) and sore throat (59.9% vs 48.4%; P < .001) were significantly higher among public versus private outpatient respondents. We did not find significant differences for cold/flu, sinus infection, or bronchitis between these 2 healthcare systems (Fig. 1). In 11 of the 14 situations, patients in public clinics were more likely to report a likelihood of using nonprescription antibiotics than the patients visiting the private emergency rooms (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Future stewardship interventions should be aware of the symptoms and illnesses and situations that may influence outpatients to take nonprescription antibiotics. Addressing modifiable factors (eg, leftover antibiotics, antibiotics given by friends or family, and antibiotics available without a prescription in stores or markets) may also curtail these unsafe practices and reduce antibiotic resistance.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) experience frequent exposure to antimicrobial regimens, leaving them at higher risk for developing antibiotic resistance. Little information on the prevalence of antibiotic resistance among patients with rUTI has been published. Although the IDSA recommends using a prior culture to guide empiric treatment, studies have not examined the predictive ability of a prior culture among patients meeting rUTI criteria. We constructed an antibiogram and evaluated test metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of a prior culture (any organism), on predicting resistance (PPV) or susceptibility (NPV) of a future culture among patients with uncomplicated rUTI in an outpatient setting. Methods: We retrospectively extracted electronic health record data from outpatients aged ≥18 years who had an ICD-10 code for cystitis listed twice in 6 months or thrice in 12 months between November 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Patients sought care at either urology or primary care practices within an academic medical center in Houston, Texas. Patients with functional or structural abnormalities of the genitourinary tract, signs or symptoms of pyelonephritis, or pregnancy were excluded. Antibiogram data were reported for uropathogens with ≥30 isolates, and intermediate results were considered resistant. Test metrics and Bayes’ PPV and NPV were calculated using standard formulas. Results: We included 597 visits from 232 unique patients. Most were White (63%) and female (92%), and the cohort had a median age of 58 (IQR, 41–68). Among 310 rUTI episodes with a urine culture, 189 (61%) had at least 1 uropathogen isolated, and Escherichia coli (n = 130, 66%) was most common among all 196 uropathogens. E. coli isolates had >20% resistance to 10 of 18 antibiotics (Fig. 1). E. coli resistance to ciprofloxacin was 27.9%, resistance to nitrofurantoin was 5.5%, and resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was 38.0%. The PPVs for predicting resistance were highest for ceftriaxone (0.86; 95% CI, 0.60–0.96), ciprofloxacin (0.84; 95% CI, 0.63–0.94), and levofloxacin (0.84; 95% CI, 0.63–0.94). NPVs of resistance were highest for gentamicin (0.97; 95% CI, 0.83–1.00), ceftriaxone (0.94; 95% CI, 0.86–0.98), and cefepime (0.94; 95% CI, 0.84–0.98), whereas NPVs for cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin were all >0.83. Conclusions: We detected considerable antibiotic resistance among patients with rUTI to commonly prescribed antibiotics. Prior urine culture susceptibility demonstrated moderate-to-high PPVs for predicting future resistance to ceftriaxone and fluoroquinolones as well as high NPVs for several cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, which could inform empiric prescribing choices.

Funding: This investigator-initiated research study was funded by Rebiotix, a Ferring Company.

Disclosures: None

Background: Studies of antibiotic prescribing choice and duration have typically excluded women with recurrent UTI (rUTI), yet the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) UTI treatment guidelines are applicable to recurrent and sporadic cystitis. We sought to better understand prescribing practices among uncomplicated rUTI patients in terms of choice of drug, duration of therapy, and the risk factors for receiving guideline-discordant therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective database study by extracting electronic health record data from adults seen at academic primary care, internal medicine, or urology practices between November 2016 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria included having ≥2 or ≥3 International Classification of Diseases Tenth Edition (ICD-10) cystitis codes recorded within a 6- or 12-month period, respectively. We excluded patients with ICD-10 codes indicating any structural or functional genitourinary comorbidities, interstitial cystitis, vaginosis, compromised immune systems, or pregnancy in the prior year. Patients were also excluded if they had signs or symptoms of pyelonephritis at presentation. Results: Overall, 232 patients presented for 597 outpatient visits. Most were married (52.2%), non-Hispanic white (62.9%), and female (92.2%), with a median age of 58 years (IQR, 41–68). Only 21% of visits with an antibiotic prescribed for treatment consisted of a first-line therapy agent prescribed for the recommended duration. In terms of antibiotic choice, these agents were prescribed in 58.4% of scenarios, which primarily included nitrofurantoin (37.8%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (20.3%). Guideline-discordant choices of fluoroquinolones (28.8%), and β-lactams (11.2%) were the second and third most commonly prescribed drug categories, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression identified age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.002–1.04) or having a telephone visit (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.54–6.52) as independent risk factors for receiving a β-lactam. The duration exceeded the 3-day guideline recommendation in 87.6% of fluoroquinolones and 73% of TMP-SMX (73%) prescriptions, and 61% of nitrofurantoin prescriptions exceeded the recommended 5-day duration. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that seeking care at a urology clinic (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.59–5.17) served as an independent factor for therapy duration exceeding guideline recommendations. Conclusions: This retrospective study revealed shortcomings in prescribing practices in the type and duration of therapy for rUTI. rUTI as well as sporadic UTI are important targets for outpatient antibiotic stewardship interventions.

Funding: This investigator-initiated research study was funded by Rebiotix Inc, a Ferring Company.

Disclosures: None

Background: Urine cultures are the most common microbiological tests in the outpatient setting and heavily influence treatment of suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs). Antibiotics for UTI are usually prescribed on an empiric basis in primary care before the urine culture results are available. However, culture results may be needed to confirm a UTI diagnosis and to verify that the correct antibiotic was prescribed. Although urine cultures are considered as the gold standard for diagnosis of UTI, cultures can easily become contaminated during collection. We determined the prevalence, predictors, and antibiotic use associated with contaminated urine cultures in 2 adult safety net primary care clinics. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of visits with provider-suspected UTI in which a urine culture was ordered (November 2018–March 2020). Patient demographics, culture results, and prescription orders were captured for each visit. Culture results were defined as no culture growth, contaminated (ie, mixed flora, non-uropathogens, or ≥3 bacteria isolated on culture), low-count positive (growth between 100 and 100,000 CFU/mL), and high-count positive (>100,000 CFU/mL). A multivariable multinomial logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with contaminated culture results. Results: There were 1,265 visits with urine cultures: 264 (20.9%) had no growth, 694 (54.9%) were contaminated, 159 (12.6%) were low counts, and 148 (11.7%) were high counts. Encounter-level factors are presented in Table 1. Female gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 15.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.21–23.46; P < .001), pregnancy (aOR, 13.98; 95% CI, 7.93–4.67; P < .001), and obesity (aOR, 1.9; 95% CI 1.31–2.77; P < .001) were independently associated with contaminated cultures. Of 264 patients whose urine cultures showed no growth, 36 (14%) were prescribed an antibiotic. Of 694 patients with contaminated cultures, 153 (22%) were prescribed an antibiotic (Figure 1). Conclusions: More than half of urine cultures were contaminated, and 1 in 5 patients were treated with antibiotics. Reduction of contamination should improve patient care by providing a more accurate record of the organism in the urine (if any) and its susceptibilities, which are relevant to managing future episodes of UTI in that patient. Optimizing urine collection represents a diagnostic stewardship opportunity in primary care.

Funding: This study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (grant no. UM1AI104681). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosures: None

Table 1.

Figure 1.

Background: Targeted antibiotic stewardship interventions are needed to reduce unnecessary treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). Organizational readiness for change is a precursor to successful change implementation. The Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) is a validated survey instrument that has been used to detect potential obstacles and tailor interventions. In an outpatient stewardship study, primary care practices with high readiness to change trended toward greater improvements in antibiotic prescribing. We used the ORCA to assess barriers to change before implementing a multicenter inpatient stewardship intervention for ASB. Methods: Surveys were self-administered by healthcare professionals in inpatient medicine and long-term care units at 4 geographically diverse Veterans’ Affairs facilities during January–December 2018. Participants included providers (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners), nurses, pharmacists, infection preventionists, and quality managers. The survey included 7 subscales: evidence (perceived evidence strength) and 6 context subscales (favorability of the organizational context to support change). Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 meaning very weak or strongly disagree. Scores were compared between professional types and sites. We also measured allocated employee effort for stewardship at each site. Results: Overall, 104 surveys were completed, with an overall response rate of 69.3%. For all sites combined, the evidence subscale had the highest score of the 7 subscales (mean, 4; SD, 0.9); the resources subscale was significantly lower than other subscales (mean, 2.8; SD, 0.9; P < .001). Scores for budget and staffing resources were lower than scores for training and facility resources (P < .001 for both comparisons). Pharmacists had lower scores than providers for the staff culture subscale (P = .04). Comparing subscales between sites, ORCA scores were significantly different for leadership behavior (communication and management), measurement (goal setting and accountability), and general resources (Fig. 1). The site with the lowest scores for resources (mean, 2.4) also had lower scores for leadership behavior and measurement, and lower pharmacist effort devoted to antibiotic stewardship. Conclusions: Although healthcare professionals endorsed the evidence about nontreatment of ASB, perceived barriers to antibiotic stewardship included inadequate resources and lack of leadership support. These findings provide targets for tailoring the intervention to maximize the success of our stewardship program. Our support to sites with lower leadership scores includes training of local champions who are dedicated to supporting the intervention. For sites with low scores for resources, our targeted implementation strategies include analyzing local needs and avoiding increased workload for existing personnel.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: The reported prevalence of nonprescription antibiotic use in the United States varies from 5% among socioeconomically and ethnically diverse primary care patients to 66% among Latino migrant workers. Reports indicate that people obtain and take antibiotics from stores or flea markets in the United States, friends or relatives, and leftover antibiotics from previous prescriptions. This unsafe practice may lead to unnecessary and inappropriate antibiotic use and increases the risk of antibiotic resistance. As groundwork to develop an intervention to decrease nonprescription antibiotic use, we mapped reported drivers of nonprescription use to the Kilbourne conceptual framework for advancing health disparities research. Methods: The Kilbourne framework consists of 3 phases: (1) detection of health disparities and identification of vulnerable populations, (2) understanding why disparities exist, and (3) reducing or eliminating disparities through interventions. We focused on the first 2 phases and mapped the identified drivers of nonprescription antibiotic use onto the key domains of the Kilbourne conceptual framework: patient, healthcare system, and clinical encounter factors. We also conducted brief field research to explore anecdotal reports regarding availability of nonprescription antibiotics in our community. Results: We found 8 studies addressing factors related to nonprescription antibiotic use in the United States. These studies were primarily qualitative and included Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino immigrants. Figure 1 shows the proposed factors that may directly or indirectly predict nonprescription antibiotic use. Key potential factors are individual factors, psychosocial factors, resources, healthcare system factors, and clinical-encounter factors. For example, patients with inadequate health literacy may have poor access to care because of difficulty finding providers and choosing or navigating insurance plans; thus, they may be at risk for nonprescription use. At the same time, patients with inadequate health literacy may be at risk for using nonprescription antibiotics for a viral infection because of difficulty understanding medication labels or package inserts. The relevance of resources (availability) to nonprescription antibiotic use was supported by our research team’s purchase of amoxicillin, tetracycline, and metronidazole without prescriptions from a flea market in Houston, Texas. Conclusions: The Kilbourne conceptual framework provides a strong, comprehensive basis for research and intervention in the challenging problem of nonprescription antibiotic use. Ongoing research will test the proposed relationships between patient, healthcare system, and clinical-encounter factors and nonprescription antibiotic use outcomes. We are conducting a survey among both indigent and insured patient populations to identify the relative importance of these factors and to validate our proposed conceptual framework of nonprescription antibiotic use.

Funding: This project was supported by grant number R01HS026901 from the Agency.

Disclosures: None

Background: Outpatients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are often treated empirically without culture, whereas urine cultures are typically collected from patients with complicated UTI. Susceptibilities for fosfomycin (a first-line agent) are not routinely performed or reported in the antibiogram. Understanding the prevalence of antibiotic resistance for UTI is critical for empiric treatment and antibiotic stewardship in primary care. Methods: We developed a UTI-focused antibiogram from a prospective sample of outpatients (women and men) with UTIs from 2 public family medicine clinics in an urban area with a diverse, international population (November 2018 to present). During the study period, providers ordered a urine culture for any adult patient presenting with UTI symptoms, including uncomplicated and complicated infections. We estimated the prevalence of resistance to UTI-relevant antibiotics in the overall study population and compared it between patients born in the United States and other countries. Results: We collected 678 urine cultures from 644 unique patients (79% female). Of these cultures, 158 (23.3%) had no growth, 330 (48.7%) grew mixed urogenital flora, and 190 (28.0%) were positive (>10,000 CFU/mL). Patients with positive cultures were mostly female (88.2%), and their mean age was 46.6 ± 14.8 years. Among patients with positive cultures, 42.7% were born in the United States and 57.3% were born Mexico or Central America. Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated organism (Fig. 1). Susceptibility results for E. coli and all gram-negative organisms combined are presented in Fig. 2. Susceptibility of uropathogens to TMP-SMX was significantly higher in patients born in the United States compared to patients from Mexico or Central America (82% vs 61%; P = .03). Susceptibility to ciprofloxacin was similar in patients born in the United States and other countries (79% vs 72%; P = .50). Of 77 E. coli isolates, 11 (14%) were positive for extended-spectrum β-lactamase production, including 8 isolates from patients whose country of origin was Mexico or a Central American country. Conclusions: More than 20% of outpatients presenting with UTI symptoms had a negative urine culture. Among outpatients with uncomplicated and complicated UTI, uropathogens had a high prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin and TMP-SMX, but susceptibility to fosfomycin (restricted in our system) was 100%. Resistance rates for TMP-SMX were higher in patients from Mexico and Central America. Our findings question whether TMP-SMX should remain a first-line agent in US primary-care settings.

Funding: This project was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UM1AI104681.

Disclosures: None

Adherence to 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for urinary tract infections (UTIs) remains low in primary care. Fluoroquinolones are commonly prescribed to treat uncomplicated cystitis, and most antibiotic prescriptions have durations that exceed current recommendations. We performed a difference-in-differences study to assess the effectiveness of a stewardship intervention in a family medicine clinic at an academic outpatient center from August 2016 to March 2019. During our intervention period, the FDA released 2 additional warnings about the side effects of fluoroquinolones. Methods: The study had 2 sites (intervention and comparison) and 3 periods: baseline, before the intervention, and the intervention. During the first 2 years, we obtained baseline data and performed interviews (preintervention period) exploring provider prescribing decisions for cystitis at both sites. During the intervention period at the intervention site only, we presented an educational lecture including an overview of the IDSA guidelines, definitions for various UTI syndromes and actual clinical examples, and instruction on use of a decision aid. During the audit and feedback phase, providers were contacted once per month in person or by phone to provide follow-up on whether their treatment decision adhered to the IDSA guidelines. We performed a log-binomial regression analysis of the primary outcome, adherence to the IDSA guidelines for management of uncomplicated cystitis, both to antibiotic choice and duration of therapy. Results: We performed 156 audit-and-feedback sessions with 13 providers during the intervention period (March 2018–2019). Patients in both sites were similar in terms of age and Charlson comorbidity index. Adherence to the guidelines for antibiotic choice and duration increased in the intervention period at both sites (Fig. 1). The treatment of cystitis in the intervention period of the intervention site was 11.5 times (95% CI, 6.1–21.6) as likely to be guideline-adherent as the treatment in the baseline period of the comparison site (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Adherence to IDSA guidelines for the choice of antibiotic and duration increased in both intervention and comparison sites. Even though the intervention site started with higher compliance, improvement was also greater in the intervention site. FDA warnings about the side effects of fluoroquinolones released during the intervention period may have contributed to the avoidance of fluoroquinolones at both sites. Our intervention was effective at improving antibiotic choice and duration, so our future plans include incorporating our decision-support algorithm into the electronic medical record.

Funding: This study was supported by Zambon Pharmaceuticals.

Disclosures: None