Accumulating evidence suggests that rapid eye movement sleep (REM) supports the consolidation of extinction memory. REM is disrupted in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and REM abnormalities after traumatic events increase the risk of developing PTSD. Therefore, it was hypothesized that abnormal REM in trauma-exposed individuals may pave the way for PTSD by interfering with the processing of extinction memory. In addition, PTSD patients display reduced vagal activity. Vagal activity contributes to the strengthening of memories, including fear extinction memory, and recent studies show that the role of vagus in memory processing extends to memory consolidation during sleep. Therefore, it is plausible that reduced vagal activity during sleep in trauma-exposed individuals may be an additional mechanism that impairs extinction memory consolidation. However, to date, the contribution of sleep vagal activity to the consolidation of extinction memory or any emotional memory has not been investigated.

Trauma-exposed individuals (n = 113) underwent a 2-day fear conditioning and extinction protocol. Conditioning and extinction learning phases were followed by extinction recall 24 h later. The association of extinction recall with REM characteristics and REM vagal activity (indexed as heart rate variability) during the intervening consolidation night was examined.

Consistent with our hypotheses, REM disruption was associated with poorer physiological and explicit extinction memory. Furthermore, higher vagal activity during REM was associated with better explicit extinction memory, and physiological extinction memory in males.

These findings support the notion that abnormal REM, including reduced REM vagal activity, may contribute to PTSD by impairing the consolidation of extinction memory.

Alterations in cerebral blood flow (CBF) are associated with risk of cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Although apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 and greater vascular risk burden have both been linked to reduced CBF in older adults, less is known about how APOE ε4 status and vascular risk may interact to influence CBF. We aimed to determine whether the effect of vascular risk on CBF varies by gene dose of APOE ε4 alleles (i.e., number of e4 alleles) in older adults without dementia.

144 older adults without dementia from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) underwent arterial spin labeling (ASL) and T1-weighted MRI, APOE genotyping, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), lumbar puncture, and blood pressure assessment. Vascular risk was assessed using pulse pressure (systolic blood pressure -diastolic blood pressure), which is thought to be a proxy for arterial stiffening. Participants were classified by number of APOE ε4 alleles (n0 alleles = 87, m allele = 46, n2 alleles = 11). CBF in six FreeSurfer-derived a priori regions of interest (ROIs) vulnerable to AD were examined: entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, inferior temporal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, rostral middle frontal gyrus, and medial orbitofrontal cortex. Linear regression models tested the interaction between categorical APOE ε4 dose (0, 1, or 2 alleles) and continuous pulse pressure on CBF in each ROI, adjusting for age, sex, cognitive diagnosis (cognitively unimpaired vs. mild cognitive impairment), antihypertensive medication use, cerebral metabolism (FDG-PET composite), reference CBF region (precentral gyrus), and AD biomarker positivity defined using the ADNI-optimized phosphorylated tau/ß-amyloid ratio cut-off of > 0.0251 pg/ml.

A significant pulse pressure X APOE ε4 dose interaction was found on CBF in the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, and inferior parietal cortex (ps < .005). Among participants with two e4 alleles, higher pulse pressure was significantly associated with lower CBF (ps < .001). However, among participants with zero or one ε4 allele, there was no significant association between pulse pressure and CBF (ps > .234). No significant pulse pressure X APOE ε4 dose interaction was found in the inferior temporal cortex, rostral middle frontal gyrus, or medial orbitofrontal cortex (ps > .109). Results remained unchanged when additionally controlling for general vascular risk assessed via the modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale.

These findings demonstrate that the cross-sectional association between pulse pressure and region-specific CBF differs by APOE ε4 dose. In particular, a detrimental effect of elevated pulse pressure on CBF in AD-vulnerable regions was found only among participants with the e4/e4 genotype. Our findings suggest that pulse pressure may play a mechanistic role in neurovascular unit dysregulation for those genetically at greater risk for AD. Given that pulse pressure is just one of many potentially modifiable vascular risk factors for AD, future studies should seek to examine how these other factors (e.g., diabetes, high cholesterol) may interact with APOE genotype to affect cerebrovascular dysfunction.

Higher educational attainment is associated with reduced risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and its protective effect may act through alterations in cerebral blood flow (CBF) that allow for better coping with accumulating neuropathology. Additionally, there are sex differences in both the risk of developing AD as well as the potential protective effects of education. We therefore sought to investigate whether education moderates the association of hippocampal CBF and memory in cognitively unimpaired older adults, and to examine if these interactions were moderated by sex.

Cognitively unimpaired older adults from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; 51 men, 50 women) underwent neuropsychological evaluation and arterial spin labeling MRI, which was used to quantify bilateral hippocampal CBF. Sex was defined as sex at birth. Multiple linear regressions assessed (1) the independent associations among education, CBF, and memory performance separately in men and women and (2) the three-way interactions among CBF, sex, and education, followed by sex-stratified analyses. Three outcome measures were examined: Logical Memory Story A immediate and delayed recall, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) intrusions. All models adjusted for age and APOE epsilon-4 allele frequency, and all models with CBF additionally adjusted for cerebral metabolism (baseline FDG-PET composite) and pulse pressure.

CBF was not associated with education or memory in either women or men. There was a positive association between education and delayed memory in women (ß=0.14, t=2.64, p=0.008) as well as trending, positive associations between education and immediate memory in women (ß=0.09, t=1.79, p=0.074) and education and delayed memory in men (ß=0.09, t=1.94, p=0.054). Three-way interactions among sex, CBF, and education were significant on immediate recall (ß=2.55, t=2.53, p=0.013), delayed recall (ß=2.56, t=2.44, p=0.017), and RAVLT intrusions (ß=-2.28, t=-2.27, p=0.026). In women, there were interactions between education and hippocampal CBF on both immediate (ß=2.49, t=2.90, p=0.006) and delayed recall (ß=2.30, t=2.78, p=0.009), such that as education increased, the strength of the association between CBF and immediate memory increased. There was also an interaction between education and hippocampal CBF on RAVLT intrusions in women (ß=-2.42, t=-3.05, p=0.004), such that as education increased, the strength of the association between CBF and number of intrusions decreased; there was a main effect where in women with lower education, as CBF increased, the number of intrusions increased (ß=0.76, t=2.59, p=0.032); in women with higher education, there was no association between CBF and intrusions. In men, none of these two-way interactions were significant.

These results suggest that, in cognitively unimpaired older women, the relationship between hippocampal CBF and memory is moderated by education level, even when adjusting for several other factors. Specifically, higher education may serve as a protective factor in the hippocampal CBF-memory relationship, and this relationship was sex-dependent, occurring in women only. Further research is needed to examine these relationships longitudinally across the clinical continuum of AD. Additionally, this work needs to be conducted in more diverse samples to allow for analyses investigating the impact of education on the intersection of race/ethnicity and sex/gender.

Bayesian statistical approaches are extensively used in new statistical methods but have not been adopted at the same rate in clinical and translational (C&T) research. The goal of this paper is to accelerate the transition of new methods into practice by improving the C&T researcher’s ability to gain confidence in interpreting and implementing Bayesian analyses.

We developed a Bayesian data analysis plan and implemented that plan for a two-arm clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of a new opioid in reducing time to discharge from the post-operative anesthesia unit and nerve block usage in surgery. Through this application, we offer a brief tutorial on Bayesian methods and exhibit how to apply four Bayesian statistical packages from STATA, SAS, and RStan to conduct linear and logistic regression analyses in clinical research.

The analysis results in our application were robust to statistical package and consistent across a wide range of prior distributions. STATA was the most approachable package for linear regression but was more limited in the models that could be fitted and easily summarized. SAS and R offered more straightforward documentation and data management for the posteriors. They also offered direct programming of the likelihood making them more easily extendable to complex problems.

Bayesian analysis is now accessible to a broad range of data analysts and should be considered in more C&T research analyses. This will allow C&T research teams the ability to adopt and interpret Bayesian methodology in more complex problems where Bayesian approaches are often needed.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a dramatic impact on the health and social care landscape, both in terms of service provision and citizen need. Responsive, evidence-based research is essential to develop and implement appropriate policies and practices that manage both the pandemic itself, and the impact COVID-19 has on other health and social care issues.

To address this, the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was launched in 2021 with the aim of providing the best available, up-to-date, and relevant evidence to inform health and care decision making across Wales.

Funded by the Welsh Government, the WCEC comprises of a core team and several collaborating partner organizations, including Health Technology Wales, Wales Centre for Evidence-Based Care, Specialist Unit for Review Evidence Centre, SAIL Databank, Public Health Wales, Bangor Institute for Health & Medical Research in conjunction with Health and Care Economics Cymru, and the Public Health Wales Observatory. Over the last year, WCEC has developed its rapid review processes and methodology informed by best international practice and aims to provide around 50 reviews each year. WCEC works alongside various stakeholder groups from health and social care across Wales, and they form an integral part of the review process, from scoping to knowledge mobilization.

To date, the WCEC has produced reviews on a diverse range of COVID-19 topics, including transmission, vaccination uptake (barriers, facilitators and interventions), mental health and wellbeing, as well as face coverings and other preventative interventions. The topics have also covered a wide range of populations, from general public, to healthcare workers, to children. These reviews have been used to inform policy and decision-making, including the Welsh Government’s Chief Medical Officer 21-day COVID-19 reviews.

The WCEC has brought together multiple specialist centers with a diverse range of skills to produce timely reviews of the most up-to-date research to support decision makers across health and social care. These reviews have informed policy and decision-making across Wales.

Cognitive dispersion across neuropsychological measures within a single testing session is a promising marker predictive of cognitive decline and development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, little is known regarding brain changes underlying cognitive dispersion, and the association of cognitive dispersion with in vivo AD biomarkers and regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) has received limited study. We therefore examined associations among cognitive dispersion, amyloid-beta (Aβ) positivity, and regional CBF among older adults free of dementia.

One hundred and forty-eight Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants underwent neuropsychological testing and neuroimaging. Pulsed arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was acquired to quantify CBF. Florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) imaging determined Aβ positivity.

Adjusting for age, gender, education, and mean cognitive performance, older adults who were Aβ+ showed higher cognitive dispersion relative to those who were Aβ-. Across the entire sample, higher cognitive dispersion was associated with reduced CBF in inferior parietal and temporal regions. Secondary analyses stratified by Aβ status demonstrated that higher cognitive dispersion was associated with reduced CBF among Aβ+ individuals but not among those who were Aβ-.

Cognitive dispersion may be sensitive to early Aβ accumulation and cerebrovascular changes adjusting for demographics and mean neuropsychological performance. Associations between cognitive dispersion and CBF were observed among Aβ+ individuals, suggesting that cognitive dispersion may be a marker of brain changes among individuals on the AD continuum. Future studies should examine whether cognitive dispersion predicts brain changes in diverse samples and among those with greater vascular risk burden.

Optimizing needleless connector hub disinfection practice is a key strategy in central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention. In this mixed-methods evaluation, 3 products with varying scrub times were tested for experimental disinfection followed by a qualitative nursing assessment of each.

Needleless connectors were inoculated with varying concentrations of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus followed by disinfection with a 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) wipe (a 15-second scrub time and a 15-second dry time), a 70% IPA cap (a 10-second scrub time and a 5-second dry time), or a 3.15% chlorhexidine gluconate with 70% IPA (CHG/IPA) wipe (a 5-second scrub time and a 5-second dry time). Cultures of needleless connectors were obtained after disinfection to quantify bacterial reduction. This was followed by surveying a convenience sample of nursing staff with intensive care unit assignments at an academic tertiary hospital on use of each product.

All products reduced overall bacterial burden when compared to sterile water controls, however the IPA and CHG/IPA wipes were superior to the IPA caps when product efficacy was compared. Nursing staff noted improved compliance with CHG/IPA wipes compared with the IPA wipes and the IPA caps, with many preferring the lesser scrub and dry times required for disinfection.

Achieving adequate bacterial disinfection of needleless connectors while maximizing healthcare staff compliance with scrub and dry times may be best achieved with a combination CHG/IPA wipe.

This project aimed to further develop a teaching programme for Foundation Doctors attached to a psychiatry rotation. The purpose was threefold – to educate foundation doctors about important psychiatric topics; to encourage them to think about wider impacts of psychiatry; and to inspire them to consider psychiatric training in the longer term.

The Royal College of Psychiatrists’ mission statement includes actively promoting psychiatry as a career and improving knowledge of mental health, including its interactions with people's physical and social backgrounds. Targeting foundation doctors rotating into psychiatry posts is a good opportunity to achieve these objectives, as they will be the cross-speciality doctors of the future, and have specific learning needs given their unique rotations and new medical careers.

On one Wednesday morning per month Foundation Doctors had a specific teaching session for them. The sessions consisted of four 30-minute teaching blocks which, crucially, were given by foundation doctors. They were facilitated by a core psychiatry trainee, and the topics were decided by the doctor teaching each 30-minute block. The foundation doctors were able teach on any topic related to psychiatry that interested them. Feedback forms were developed and provided at the end of each session for the foundation doctors, as well as at the end of each recent foundation rotation, to get feedback on the overall quality of the course delivered.

The programme has now had 6 complete cohorts of foundation doctors. We have built a varied topic bank from past sessions, including the Mental Health Act, dementia, the Mind-Body Problem, psychiatry in video games and sociology of psychiatric illness, amongst other topics. All foundation doctors questioned have agreed or strongly agreed that the sessions were helpful for their psychiatric rotation and general medical training. Particularly praised aspects were the ability to discuss psychiatric topics that weren't normally discussed in an academic environment, being able to take ownership over learning and practicing giving teaching. Vitally, core trainee facilitators also found the sessions inspiring for their training.

The Foundation Teaching Programme has increased doctors’ knowledge of a range of psychiatric topics, the breadth of which and agency in choosing topics has increased engagement with psychiatry, regardless of planned medical training speciality. Areas to explore in the future include potentially opening attendance to medical students and physician associate students, and to other regions of the deanery. Evaluating the long-term impact of this training is also warranted.

To examine associations between household food insecurity and children’s physical activity and sedentary behaviours.

Secondary analysis was conducted on the Healthy Communities Study, an observational study from 2013 to 2015. Household food insecurity was assessed by two items from the US Department of Agriculture’s 18-item US Household Food Security Survey Module. Physical activity was measured using the 7-d Physical Activity Behaviour Recall instrument. Data were analysed using multilevel statistical modelling.

A total of 130 communities in the USA.

In sum, 5138 US children aged 4–15 years.

No associations were found for the relationship between household food insecurity and child physical activity. A significant interaction between household food insecurity and child sex for sedentary behaviours was observed (P = 0·03).

Additional research capturing a more detailed assessment of children’s experiences of food insecurity in relation to physical activity is warranted. Future studies may consider adopting qualitative study designs or utilising food insecurity measures that specifically target child-level food insecurity. Subsequent research may also seek to further explore sub-group analyses by sex.

The rapid spread of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) throughout key regions of the United States in early 2020 placed a premium on timely, national surveillance of hospital patient censuses. To meet that need, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), the nation’s largest hospital surveillance system, launched a module for collecting hospital coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) data. We present time-series estimates of the critical hospital capacity indicators from April 1 to July 14, 2020.

From March 27 to July 14, 2020, the NHSN collected daily data on hospital bed occupancy, number of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and the availability and/or use of mechanical ventilators. Time series were constructed using multiple imputation and survey weighting to allow near–real-time daily national and state estimates to be computed.

During the pandemic’s April peak in the United States, among an estimated 431,000 total inpatients, 84,000 (19%) had COVID-19. Although the number of inpatients with COVID-19 decreased from April to July, the proportion of occupied inpatient beds increased steadily. COVID-19 hospitalizations increased from mid-June in the South and Southwest regions after stay-at-home restrictions were eased. The proportion of inpatients with COVID-19 on ventilators decreased from April to July.

The NHSN hospital capacity estimates served as important, near–real-time indicators of the pandemic’s magnitude, spread, and impact, providing quantitative guidance for the public health response. Use of the estimates detected the rise of hospitalizations in specific geographic regions in June after they declined from a peak in April. Patient outcomes appeared to improve from early April to mid-July.