Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×

Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.

  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

38 results

Page 1 of 2

  • A living reasonable account: on the status of Timaeus’ eikōs logos (again)

  • Federico M. Petrucci
  • Journal:
    The Journal of Hellenic Studies / Volume 144 / November 2024
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 November 2024, pp. 209-227
    Print publication:
    November 2024
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Is an account of hair or nails as negotiable as one of the Demiurge? It should not be. The aim of this paper is to supplement existing interpretations of Timaeus’ eikōs logos in order to provide well-grounded answers to this and similar questions. More specifically, I shall demonstrate that Timaeus’ account cannot be confined to a single epistemological field, namely that of unstable likeliness, because it exhibits a much more nuanced and graduated structure, just as do the realities it deals with, and, as a whole, leaves minimal room for refutation and scepticism.

  • DIVINE CONFIRMATION: PLATO, TIMAEUS 55C7–D6

  • Federico M. Petrucci
  • Journal:
    The Classical Quarterly / Volume 71 / Issue 2 / December 2021
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    09 September 2021, pp. 886-891
    Print publication:
    December 2021
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Burnet's text at Pl. Ti. 55c7–d6 is at least questionable, and opting for a different reading at 55d5 (θεός instead of θεόν) would shed light on an intriguing argumentative aspect of Plato's cosmological account: God confirms the metaphysical reasons why there is just one perfect world.

  • Chapter 4 - Authority beyond Doctrines in the First Century bc

  • Edited by Michael Erler, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany, Jan Erik Heßler, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany, Federico M. Petrucci, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
  • Book:
    Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition
    Published online:
    19 February 2021
    Print publication:
    04 March 2021, pp 89-114

  • Summary

    After some decades of transition, in the first half of the first century bc, (almost) everything changed. This happened in the Stoa, where non-Athenian scholarchs felt the need for new perspectives, and for a clearer integration of Plato’s doctrine.1 This happened in the Garden, which found new life in Italy with Philodemus’ ‘adaptation’.2 This happened in the Peripatos, where both the recovery of Aristotle’s esoteric writings (in whatever form this may have occurred) and the introduction of a new approach to Aristotle’s philosophy ushered in a new era.3 More generally, the so-called decentralisation of philosophy strongly affected all schools, and determined the need for new ways of thinking and new approaches to authoritative texts.

  • Introduction

  • Edited by Michael Erler, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany, Jan Erik Heßler, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany, Federico M. Petrucci, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
  • Book:
    Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition
    Published online:
    19 February 2021
    Print publication:
    04 March 2021, pp 1-11

  • Summary

    If one had to provide a formal account of what ‘being a Platonist’ means, it would be tempting to refer to the broad idea that a Platonist is, in general, a follower of Plato, which implies a commitment to Plato’s authority. After all, this would be a reasonable description for all heirs of Plato, from the Academics – the scholarchs of the Academy were in any case the successors of Plato, and claimed for themselves the privilege of this relationship – to late-antique Platonists, who regarded themselves as exegetes and interpreters of Plato’s thought. Things are not that easy, however, for once one examines such a general account in detail a series of serious questions emerge. A first – and clearer – puzzle is related to the discontinuity of the tradition: while on the one hand one can say that there is a continuous stream of heirs of Plato from the Early Academy to late Neoplatonism, on the other it is quite obvious that, even admitting a strong continuity between Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, the philosophical history of the ‘Platonist tradition’ from the Early Academy to the early Imperial Age hardly constitutes a unified whole. As a consequence, just stating that all followers of Plato were committed to his authority would amount to an empty and uninformative statement: the more one generalises the notion in order to make it comprehensive, the less it is specific and able to really include the distinguishing features of each stage of the tradition.

Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition
  • Edited by Michael Erler, Jan Erik Heßler, Federico M. Petrucci
  • Published online:
    19 February 2021
    Print publication:
    04 March 2021
  • All disciplines can count on a noble founder, and the representation of this founder as an authority is key in order to construe a discipline's identity. This book sheds light on how Plato and other authorities were represented in one of the most long-lasting traditions of all time. It leads the reader through exegesis and polemics, recovery of the past and construction of a philosophical identity. From Xenocrates to Proclus, from the sceptical shift to the re-establishment of dogmatism, from the Mosaic of the Philosophers to the Neoplatonist Commentaries, the construction of authority emerges as a way of access to the core of the Platonist tradition.

Page 1 of 2