Negative symptoms are a key feature of several psychiatric disorders. Difficulty identifying common neurobiological mechanisms that cut across diagnostic boundaries might result from equifinality (i.e., multiple mechanistic pathways to the same clinical profile), both within and across disorders. This study used a data-driven approach to identify unique subgroups of participants with distinct reward processing profiles to determine which profiles predicted negative symptoms.

Participants were a transdiagnostic sample of youth from a multisite study of psychosis risk, including 110 individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR; meeting psychosis-risk syndrome criteria), 88 help-seeking participants who failed to meet CHR criteria and/or who presented with other psychiatric diagnoses, and a reference group of 66 healthy controls. Participants completed clinical interviews and behavioral tasks assessing four reward processing constructs indexed by the RDoC Positive Valence Systems: hedonic reactivity, reinforcement learning, value representation, and effort–cost computation.

k-means cluster analysis of clinical participants identified three subgroups with distinct reward processing profiles, primarily characterized by: a value representation deficit (54%), a generalized reward processing deficit (17%), and a hedonic reactivity deficit (29%). Clusters did not differ in rates of clinical group membership or psychiatric diagnoses. Elevated negative symptoms were only present in the generalized deficit cluster, which also displayed greater functional impairment and higher psychosis conversion probability scores.

Contrary to the equifinality hypothesis, results suggested one global reward processing deficit pathway to negative symptoms independent of diagnostic classification. Assessment of reward processing profiles may have utility for individualized clinical prediction and treatment.

Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) exist to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but implementation remains slow in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Assessing organizational readiness can improve EBI implementation outcomes, but no studies have quantitatively examined the relation between organizational readiness subcomponents and implementation outcomes. This study examines associations between readiness subcomponents and CRC screening EBI implementation outcomes in FQHCs.

We used data from an ongoing parent study to develop an organizational readiness measure using the R = MC2 heuristic. We conducted descriptive and cross-sectional analyses using FQHC clinic (n = 57) data across three states. A clinic contact completed a survey about clinic characteristics and then distributed an EBI-specific survey to clinic staff containing readiness and implementation questions about Community Guide EBIs (e.g., patient reminders). Pearson correlations assessed bivariate associations between readiness variables and implementation outcomes. We then computed multivariable linear associations between readiness variables and implementation outcomes while controlling for clinic-level variables. One-way analysis of variance tested group differences in readiness subcomponent mean scores using EBI implementation responses.

Respondents’ most common job type was medical assistant, and the most frequently implemented EBIs were provider or patient reminders. Organizational structure was associated with implementing patient reminders. Clinics reporting inconsistent implementation had lower organizational structure scores than clinics planning or fully implementing patient reminders.

This study guides researchers in prioritizing organizational structure and selecting specific implementation strategies to improve this construct to implement CRC screening-related EBIs. Future research should examine these associations using a larger sample size to explore additional relations between organizational readiness and implementation outcomes.

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of hospitalizations and mortality in the US. Overuse of extended spectrum antibiotics (ESA) for CAP contributes to antimicrobial resistance. The 2019 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society CAP guidelines emphasize de-escalation of ESA following negative cultures, early switch to oral (PO) antibiotics, and limited duration of therapy (DOT). This study describes clinicians’ acceptance of an infectious diseases-trained (ID) pharmacist-led stewardship recommendations in hospitalized patients with CAP.

This prospective, single-arm, cohort study included adults admitted with a diagnosis of pneumonia to six Cleveland Clinic hospitals receiving ID pharmacist-led stewardship recommendations. The ID pharmacist provided recommendations for ESA de-escalation, DOT, intravenous (IV) to PO transition, and antimicrobial discontinuation. Descriptive statistics were used to describe clinician acceptance rates.

From November 1, 2022, to January 31, 2024, the ID pharmacist made recommendations for 685 patient encounters to 327 clinicians. Of these patients, 52% received an ESA and 15% had severe CAP. There were 959 recommendations: ESA de-escalation (19%), DOT (46%), IV to PO transition (19%), antimicrobial discontinuation (13%), and other (3%). Clinicians accepted 693 recommendations (72%): IV to PO transition (148/184, 80%), ESA de-escalation (141/181 78%), antimicrobial discontinuation (94/128, 73%), DOT (286/437, 65%), and other (24/29, 83%).

Clinicians were generally receptive to ID pharmacist-led CAP recommendations with an overall acceptance rate of 72%. Prescribers were most receptive to recommendations for IV to PO conversion and least receptive to limiting DOT.

3q29 deletion syndrome (3q29del) is a rare (~1:30 000) genomic disorder associated with a wide array of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric phenotypes. Prior work by our team identified clinically significant executive function (EF) deficits in 47% of individuals with 3q29del; however, the nuances of EF in this population have not been described.

We used the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) to perform the first in-depth assessment of real-world EF in a cohort of 32 individuals with 3q29del (62.5% male, mean age = 14.5 ± 8.3 years). All participants were also evaluated with gold-standard neuropsychiatric and cognitive assessments. High-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed on a subset of participants (n = 24).

We found global deficits in EF; individuals with 3q29del scored higher than the population mean on the BRIEF global executive composite (GEC) and all subscales. In total, 81.3% of study subjects (n = 26) scored in the clinical range on at least one BRIEF subscale. BRIEF GEC T scores were higher among 3q29del participants with a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and BRIEF GEC T scores were associated with schizophrenia spectrum symptoms as measured by the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes. BRIEF GEC T scores were not associated with cognitive ability. The BRIEF-2 ADHD form accurately (sensitivity = 86.7%) classified individuals with 3q29del based on ADHD diagnosis status. BRIEF GEC T scores were correlated with cerebellar white matter and subregional cerebellar cortex volumes.

Together, these data expand our understanding of the phenotypic spectrum of 3q29del and identify EF as a core feature linked to both psychiatric and neuroanatomical features of the syndrome.

Chronic pain patients often contend with insomnia symptoms, creating a reciprocal relationship that adds complexity to their condition. Evaluating interventions targeting insomnia in this population becomes paramount, given the intertwined nature of pain and sleep disturbances.

This retrospective pretest design aimed to assess the efficacy of an Internet-delivered sound healing intervention in reducing insomnia severity and addressing sleep- and pain-related parameters among individuals with chronic pain.

Conducted as a community-based project, Tuning for Health provided support to individuals grappling with long-term illnesses. The intervention involved the virtual delivery of a specially crafted sound track using tuning forks over a 6-week period, supervised by an experienced therapist and administered weekly for an hour. Participants were instructed to play the track daily at a time convenient for them. A total of 68 participants (mean age 59.3 years) completed the intervention. Outcome measures, including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), a sleep diary, and assessments for anxiety, depression, and pain-related parameters, were collected at the end of the 6-week intervention and repeated after a 6-month follow-up. Negative effects were monitored and reported.

Significant immediate interaction effects (time by treatment) were observed for the pain severity, ISI and various sleep parameters, such as sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, early morning awakenings, and wake time after sleep onset. A time effect for anxiety and depression was noted at the 6-month follow-up. The group exhibited highly significant improvements in pain-related parameters. At the 6-month follow-up, sustained enhancements in sleep parameters and mental health were reported, with no reported side effects.

These unique results suggest the potential efficacy of sound healing in alleviating chronic pain and associated insomnia. Further research with a larger sample size is warranted to validate these findings. Combining sound healing with other treatments may offer enhanced outcomes for individuals dealing with both chronic pain and comorbid insomnia. This study lays the groundwork for future investigations into the promising intersection of sound healing, chronic pain management, and sleep improvement.

None Declared

The European Alliance for Sport and Mental Health (EASMH) is a partnership of scientific institutions, charity associations and sport organizations, funded by EU-Erasmus+. It aimed at developing good clinical practice in psychiatric rehabilitation through sport-based interventions as an integration of pharmacological and psychological therapies. Within the framework of the EASMH projects, several actions have been promoted including an assessment of the dissemination of sport-based interventions, a training course for specialized coaches and the implementation of pilot actions in four European Countries.

To briefly describe EASMH pilot actions performed in Finland, Italy, Romania and United Kingdom, where trained coaches delivered sport-based interventions to patients with severe mental disorders.

After completing pilot actions, charity associations and sport organizations belonging to EASMH network described general and specific aims, sport activities, composition of staff, timing and tools for assessing the outcomes.

In Italy, “Crazy for Rugby”, including adolescents and young patients, and “Not only headshots”, a football project for adults with severe mental disorders were performed. In UK, a football-based activity called “Imagine Your Goal” and a walking-football program for participants aged more than 40 were delivered. In Romania, two courses including gymnastics, yoga and pilates called “Get fit!” were provided. Different team sport-based activities were implemented in Finland, where “Multiple Sport Group” and “Rehabilitating Sports” aimed at increasing patients’ autonomy. Assessment of psychopathological, social, cognitive and sport/fitness outcomes confirmed the overall beneficial effects of sport on mental health.

Pilot actions represent the final step of EASMH project, which showed improvement of mental health outcomes by also delivering sport-based rehabilitation to patients with severe mental disorders. Institutions and stakeholders are now called to promote the implementation of such initiatives on a broader scale.

None Declared

Although over 100 million pregnant women worldwide are at risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, little data exists on the impact of COVID-19 and related treatments on maternal/neonatal health.

1) To quantify the prevalence of medication use in pregnancy to treat COVID-19; 2) To quantify and compare the risk of adverse pregnancy/neonatal outcomes in those with and without COVID-19.

In the Canadian Mother-Child population-based cohort (CAMCCO), two key sub-cohorts were identified using prospective data collection of medical services, prescription drugs, hospitalization archives data, and COVID-19 surveillance testing program (02/28/2020-2021). The first cohort included all pregnant women with at least one completed trimester of pregnancy during the study period regardless of pregnancy status (delivery, induced/planned or spontaneous abortion); this cohort was further stratified on COVID-19 status. The second cohort included all non-pregnant women (aged 15-45) with a positive COVID-19 test. COVID-19 infection in pregnant or non-pregnant women was assessed using COVID-19 test results or ICD-10CM codeU07.1 from hospital data. COVID-19 severity was categorized based on hospital admission. Women were considered exposed to COVID-19 medications if they filled at least one prescription for a medicine included in the WHO list in the 30 days pre- or 30 days post-COVID-19 positive test/diagnosis. Considering potential confounders, association between COVID-19 during pregnancy, treated vs not, and perinatal outcomes were quantified using log-binomial regression models.

150,345 pregnant women (3,464 (2.3%) had COVID-19), and 112,073 non-pregnant women with COVID-19 diagnoses were included. Pregnant women with COVID-19 were more likely to have severe infections compared to non-pregnant women with COVID-19 (11.4% vs 1.6%, p< 0.001). The most frequent medications used in pregnancy to treat COVID-19 were antibacterials (13.96%), psychoanaleptics (7.35%), and medicines for obstructive airway disease (3.20%). In pregnancy COVID-19 was associated with spontaneous abortions (adjRR 1.76, 95%CI 1.3, 2.25), gestational diabetes (adjRR 1.52, 95%CI 1.18, 1.97), prematurity (adjRR 1.30, 95%CI 1.01, 1.67), NICU admissions (adjRR 1.32, 95%CI 1.10, 1.59); COVID-19 severity was increasing these risks but COVID-19 treatment with study medications reduced all risks.

Severity of COVID-19 was greater in pregnancy. Antibacterials, psychoanaleptics, and medicines for obstructive airway disease were the most used overall. Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy was associated with higher risks of adverse maternal, and neonatal outcomes.

None Declared