Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 13 - Regulating the ‘Benefits’ of eHealth

  • from Part IV - Balancing Regulation, Innovation and Ethics
  • Edited by Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, University of Copenhagen, Michael Lowery Wilson, University of Turku, Finland, Mark Fenwick, Kyushu University, Japan, Nikolaus Forgó, Universität Wien, Austria, Till Bärnighausen, Universität Heidelberg
  • Book:
    AI in eHealth
    Published online:
    08 September 2022
    Print publication:
    15 September 2022, pp 378-400

  • Summary

    Much legal and ethical attention in the area of eHealth focuses on the risks of health data processing ‘going wrong’ – a breach of privacy occurs, data is misused in an unauthorised way, or the analysis of data gives a faulty result. However, significant challenges are also posed by such processing where the data processing ‘goes to plan’ – the analysis gives the correct result in the way intended. Such challenges stem both from the nature of the information generated, and the new contexts in which this occurs. Thus, Big Data analysis may produce ever more information in relation to a person’s future health, usually of a probabilistic nature. In what situations should such information be returned to the subject (bearing in mind also that the decision-maker increasingly will be an entity outside the traditional health care context)? This chapter considers key ethical considerations that arise in such cases, and how well the law – through liability rules for harm, caused by failure to disclose, or by unjustified disclosure – is equipped to respond.