We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Terrorist incidents lead to a range of mental health outcomes for people affected, sometimes extending years after the event. Secondary stressors can exacerbate them, and social support can provide mitigation and aid recovery. There is a need to better understand distress and mitigating factors among survivors of the Manchester Arena attack in 2017.
Aims
We explored three questions. First, what experiences of distress did participants report? Second, how might secondary stressors have influenced participants’ psychosocial recoveries? Third, what part has social support played in the relationships between distress and participants’ recovery trajectories?
Method
We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of a convenience sample of survivors of the Manchester Arena bombing (N = 84) in January 2021 (3 years 8 months post-incident), and a longitudinal study of the same participants’ scores on mental health measures over 3 years from September 2017.
Results
Survivors’ mental well-being scores in early 2021 were significantly lower than general population norms. Longitudinal follow-up provided evidence of enduring distress. Secondary stressors, specifically disruptions to close relationships, were associated with greater post-event distress and slower recovery. We found an indirect relationship between identifying with, and receiving support from, others present at the event and mental well-being >3 years later.
Conclusions
The Arena attack has had an enduring impact on mental health, even in survivors who had a mild response to the event. The quality of close relationships is pivotal to long-term outcome. Constructive support from family and friends, and people with shared experiences, are key to social cure processes that facilitate coping and recovery.
Doctors have a higher prevalence of mental ill health compared with other professional occupations but incidence rates are poorly studied.
Aims
To determine incidence rates and trends of work-related ill health (WRIH) and work-related mental ill health (WRMIH) in doctors compared with other professions in Great Britain.
Method
Incidence rates were calculated using an occupational physician reporting scheme from 2005–2010. Multilevel regression was use to study incidence rates from 2001 to 2014.
Results
Annual incidence rates for WRIH and WRIMH in doctors were 515 and 431 per 100000 people employed, respectively. Higher incidence rates for WRIH and WRMIH were observed for ambulance staff and nurses, respectively. Doctors demonstrated an annual average incidence rates increase for WRIH and WRMIH, especially in women, whereas the other occupations demonstrated a decreasing or static trend. The difference in trends between the occupations was statistically significant.
Conclusions
WRIH and WRMIH incidence rate are increasing in doctors, especially in women, warranting further research.
Judging whether we can trust other people is central to social
interaction, despite being error-prone. A fear of others can be instilled
by the contemporary political and social climate. Unfounded mistrust is
called paranoia, and in severe forms is a central symptom of
schizophrenia.
Aims
To demonstrate that individuals without severe mental illness in the
general population experience unfounded paranoid thoughts, and to
determine factors predictive of paranoia using the first laboratory
method of capturing the experience.
Method
Two hundred members of the general public were comprehensively assessed,
and then entered a virtual reality train ride populated by neutral
characters. Ordinal logistic regressions (controlling for age, gender,
ethnicity, education, intellectual functioning, socio-economic status,
train use, playing of computer games) were used to determine predictors
of paranoia.
Results
The majority agreed that the characters were neutral, or even thought
they were friendly. However, a substantial minority reported paranoid
concerns. Paranoia was strongly predicted by anxiety, worry, perceptual
anomalies and cognitive inflexibility.
Conclusions
This is the most unambiguous demonstration of paranoid ideation in the
general public so far. Paranoia can be understood in terms of cognitive
factors. The use of virtual reality should lead to rapid advances in the
understanding of paranoia.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.