We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines the figure of Jesus in the letters of Paul, where Jesus is most often called Christ or messiah. The analysis briefly considers the linguistic puzzles around Paul’s use of the word “Christ,” then trace the contours of Paul’s particular account of Jesus as the Christ: his being sent by God, dying for others, effecting the resurrection of the dead, subduing all rival powers, and handing over kingship to God.
The apostle Paul was a Jew. He was born, lived, undertook his apostolic work, and died within the milieu of ancient Judaism. And yet, many readers have found, and continue to find, Paul's thought so radical, so Christian, even so anti-Jewish – despite the fact that it, too, is Jewish through and through. This paradox, and the question how we are to explain it, are the foci of Matthew Novenson's groundbreaking book. The solution, says the author, lies in Paul's particular understanding of time. This too is altogether Jewish, with the twist that Paul sees the end of history as present, not future. In the wake of Christ's resurrection, Jews are perfected in righteousness and – like the angels – enabled to live forever, in fulfilment of God's ancient promises to the patriarchs. What is more, gentiles are included in the same pneumatic existence promised to the Jews. This peculiar combination of ethnicity and eschatology yields something that looks not quite like Judaism or Christianity as we are used to thinking of them.
This chapter shows the Jewish context of the New Testament and discusses the implications of the fact that while these writings are primarily Jewish, they have become Christian scripture. The documents highlight continuities and discontinuities between Judaism and Christianity, including themes found throughout the Documentary History, such as covenant and the identity of the people of Israel.
Many interpreters have thought that Paul’s great religious contribution was his anti-legalism, but this is wrong. Not only is Paul not anti-legalist; by most standard definitions he could actually be considered a legalist. His big idea lay elsewhere.
Paul mentions Ioudaismos twice, both instances in Galatians 1:13–14 in reference to his own past. That Greek word, however, means not “Judaism” (that is, the religion of Jewish people) but rather a minority political movement for the defense and promotion of certain Jewish customs.
It is well known that Paul opposes what he calls “justification from works of the law,” and it is often claimed that this was a familiar type of ancient Jewish piety. In fact, none of the evidence often cited in support of this claim holds up to scrutiny.
What Paul offers to gentiles is not membership in Israel but the prospect of inheriting, alongside Israel, eschatological liberty (namely, from the forces of sin and death) and justice (that is, ethical perfection) for all (Jews and gentiles, now become newborn sons of God).
Paul’s controversial claim that Jesus the messiah is “the end of the law” is directly related to his other, lesser-known claim that Jesus is “the last man,” the last mortal human. After the resurrection of the dead, Paul reasons, the law must change to accommodate the change in the people for whom it legislates.
We know that Paul had some Jewish opponents, and we know that he had some opponents who preached proselyte circumcision. Scholars have usually conflated these two groups, but all the evidence suggests that Paul’s circumcision-preaching opponents were themselves recently circumcised gentile proselytes.
Many interpreters have thought that Paul’s great religious contribution was his anti-ethnocentrism, but this is wrong. Not only is Paul not anti-ethnocentric; by most standard definitions he could actually be considered an ethnic chauvinist. His big idea lay elsewhere.
Unlike many other later Christian thinkers, Paul never imagines any supposedly “true, spiritual Israel” to contrast with the actual, empirical Israel of which he was a member by birth. He never redefines the terms Israel, Jew, or circumcision, but takes them for granted as conventional ethnonyms.
The infamous problem of “Paul and Judaism” is not a problem in itself. It only emerges at all because of Christian hindsight, when Paul’s letters are read in light of the religion that canonized them rather than the religion of their author.