Early identification of individuals at risk for dementia provides an opportunity for risk reduction strategies. Many older adults (30-60%) report specific subjective cognitive complaints, which has also been shown to increase risk for dementia. The purpose of this study is to identify whether there are particular types of complaints that are associated with future: 1) progression from a clinical diagnosis of normal to impairment (either Mild Cognitive impairment or dementia) and 2) longitudinal cognitive decline.

415 cognitively normal older adults were monitored annually for an average of 5 years. Subjective cognitive complaints were measured using the Everyday Cognition Scales (ECog) across multiple cognitive domains (memory, language, visuospatial abilities, planning, organization and divided attention). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between self-reported ECog items at baseline and progression to impairment. A total of 114 individuals progressed to impairment over an average of 4.9 years (SD=3.4 years, range=0.8-13.8). A subset of individuals (n=352) underwent repeat cognitive assessments for an average of 5.3 years. Mixed effects models with random intercepts and slopes were used to assess associations between baseline ECog items and change in episodic memory or executive function on the Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scales. Time in years since baseline, the ECog items, and the interaction were key terms of interest in the models. Separate models for both the progression analyses and mixed effects models were fit for each ECog item that included age at the baseline visit, gender, and years of education as covariates.

More complaints on five of the eight memory items, three of the nine language items, one of the seven visuospatial items, two of the five planning items, and one of the six organization items were associated with progression to impairment (HR=1.25 to 1.59, ps=0.003 to 0.03). No items from the divided attention domain were significantly associated with progression to impairment. In individuals reporting no difficulty on ECog items at the baseline visit there was no significant change over time in episodic memory(p>0.4). More complaints on seven of the eight memory items, two of the nine language items, and three of the seven visuospatial items were associated with more decline in episodic memory (ps=0.003 to 0.04). No items from the planning, organization, or divided attention domains were significantly associated with episodic memory decline. Among those reporting no difficulty on ECog items at the baseline visit there was slight decline in executive function (ps=<0.001 to 0.06). More complaints on three of the eight memory items and three of the nine language items were associated with decline in executive function (ps=0.002 to 0.047). No items from the visuospatial, planning, organization, or divided attention domains were significantly associated with decline in executive function.

These findings suggest that, among cognitively normal older adults at baseline, specific complaints across several cognitive domains are associated with progression to impairment. Complaints in the domains of memory and language are associated with decline in both episodic memory and executive function.

This study evaluated: (1) apolipoprotein E (APOE) ϵ4 prevalence among Black, Latino, and White older adults, (2) associations of APOE ϵ4 status with baseline level and change over time of cognitive outcomes across groups, and (3) combined impact of APOE ϵ4 prevalence and magnitude of effect on cognitive decline within each racial/ethnic group.

Participants included 297 White, 138 Latino, and 149 Black individuals from the longitudinal UC Davis Diversity Cohort who had APOE genotyping and ≥2 cognitive assessments. Magnitude of associations of ϵ4 with cognitive baseline and change across racial/ethnic groups was tested with multilevel parallel process longitudinal analyses and multiple group models.

ϵ4 prevalence in Black (46%) and White participants (46%) was almost double that of Latino participants (24%). ϵ4 was associated with poorer baseline episodic memory only in White participants (p = .001), but had a moderately strong association with episodic memory change across all racial/ethnic groups (Blacks= −.061 SD/year, Latinos = −.055,Whites= −.055). ϵ4 association with semantic memory change was strongest in White participants (−.071), intermediate in Latino participants (−.041), and weakest in Black participants (−.022).

Calculated cognitive trajectories across racial/ethnic groups were influenced in an additive manner by ϵ4 prevalence and strength of association with cognitive decline within the group. Group differences in ϵ4 prevalences and associations of ϵ4 with cognition may suggest different pathways from APOE to cognitive decline, and, AD possibly having less salient impact on cognitive decline in non-White participants. Differential effects of APOE on episodic memory and non-memory cognition have important implications for understanding how APOE influences late life cognitive decline.

We examined the association of generational status and age at immigration with later life cognitive outcomes in a diverse sample of Latinos and Asian Americans.

Baseline data were obtained from the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) study, and a prospective cohort is initiated in 2017.

Older adults in Northern California.

Our cohort consisted of Asians (n = 411) and Latinos (n = 340) who were on average 76 years old (SD = 6.8).

We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate associations between generational status and age at immigration (collapsed into one five-level variable) with measures of verbal episodic memory, semantic memory, and executive function, adjusting for age, gender, race and ethnicity, and own- and parental education.

Generational status and age at immigration were associated with cognitive outcomes in a graded manner. Compared to third-generation or higher immigrants, first-generation immigration in adulthood was associated with lower semantic memory (β = −0.96; 95% CI: −1.12, −0.81) than immigration in adolescence (β = −0.68; 95% CI: −0.96, −0.41) or childhood (β = −0.28; 95% CI: −0.49, −0.06). Moreover, immigration in adulthood was associated with lower executive function (β = −0.63; 95% CI: −0.78, −0.48) than immigration in adolescence (β = −0.49; 95% CI: −0.75, −0.23). Similarly, compared to third-generation individuals, first-generation immigrants had lower executive functioning scores.

Our study supports the notion that sociocontextual influences in early life impact later life cognitive scores. Longitudinal studies are needed to further clarify how immigration characteristics affect cognitive decline.