We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Retroperitoneal hematoma is an uncommon clinical entity that may be encountered more frequently as iatrogenic injuries occur during interventional procedures. This chapter presents a case study of a 71-year-old male who presented to the emergency room with new onset headache, stiff neck, and slight confusion. The clinical manifestations of retroperitoneal hematoma are vague and thus the clinician must have a high index of suspicion to make the diagnosis. If the hematoma develops near or within the iliopsoas muscle, patients will present with a femoral neuropathy. Diagnosis of retroperitoneal hematoma is made either via computed tomography (CT) or angiography. However, if the patient is unstable or has ongoing bleeding, endovascular therapy with stent-grafting across the injured vessel is a treatment option if interventional radiology is available. Surgery may also be indicated to decompress the retroperitoneal space if nerve or ureteral compression exists.
Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough is a potentially catastrophic event after arteriovenous malformation (AVM) surgery. Anesthesia providers should strive for tight perioperative blood pressure control and should be vigilant for signs of postoperative neurologic deterioration. This chapter presents a case study of a 37-year-old female with a 2-month history of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The patient underwent a successful left craniotomy for clipping and resection of an AVM located in the left parietooccipital lobe. Emergent computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain showed massive cerebral edema, as well as enlarged vascular enhancement suggesting hyperperfusion and a small intracerebral hemorrhage. One month after surgery, examination demonstrated no neurologic deficit and a cerebral angiography showed normalization of flows and diameter of the left posterior cerebral artery. Neuroimaging evidence of normal pattern of cerebral vasoreactivity along with neurologic status improvement may warrant barbiturate withdrawal and careful liberalization of the blood pressure control.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.