To evaluate the impact of a mobile-app-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention program in nursing home residents with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).

Pre-post prospective cohort study with baseline (September 2015–December 2016), phase-in (January 2017–April 2017), and intervention (May 2017–December 2018). Generalized linear mixed models compared intervention with baseline frequency of localized inflammation/infection, dressing peeling, and infection-related hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards models compared days-to-removal of lines with localized inflammation/infection.

Six nursing homes in Orange County, California.

Adult nursing home residents with PICCs.

CLABSI prevention program consisting of an actionable scoring system for identifying insertion site infection/inflammation coupled with a mobile-app enabling photo-assessments and automated physician alerting for remote response.

We completed 8,131 assessments of 817 PICCs in 719 residents (baseline: 4,865 assessments, 422 PICCs, 385 residents; intervention: 4,264 assessments, 395 PICCs, 334 residents). The intervention was associated with 57% lower odds of peeling dressings (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28–0.64, P < .001), 73% lower local inflammation/infection (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13–0.56, P < .001), and 41% lower risk of infection-related hospitalizations (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42–0.83, P = .002). Physician mobile-app alerting and response enabled 62% lower risk of lines remaining in place after inflammation/infection was identified (HR 0.38, CI: 0.24–0.62, P < .001) and 95% faster removal of infected lines from mean (SD) 19 (20) to 1 (2) days.

A mobile-app-based CLABSI prevention program decreased the frequency of inflamed/infected central line insertion sites, improved dressing integrity, increased speed of removal when inflammation/infection were found, and reduced infection-related hospitalization risk.

To assess the impact of a newly developed Central-Line Insertion Site Assessment (CLISA) score on the incidence of local inflammation or infection for CLABSI prevention.

A pre- and postintervention, quasi-experimental quality improvement study.

Adult inpatients with central venous catheters (CVCs) hospitalized in an intensive care unit or oncology ward at a large academic medical center.

We evaluated CLISA score impact on insertion site inflammation and infection (CLISA score of 2 or 3) incidence in the baseline period (June 2014–January 2015) and the intervention period (April 2015–October 2017) using interrupted times series and generalized linear mixed-effects multivariable analyses. These were run separately for days-to-line removal from identification of a CLISA score of 2 or 3. CLISA score interrater reliability and photo quiz results were evaluated.

Among 6,957 CVCs assessed 40,846 times, percentage of lines with CLISA score of 2 or 3 in the baseline and intervention periods decreased by 78.2% (from 22.0% to 4.7%), with a significant immediate decrease in the time-series analysis (P < .001). According to the multivariable regression, the intervention was associated with lower percentage of lines with a CLISA score of 2 or 3, after adjusting for age, gender, CVC body location, and hospital unit (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.06–0.34; P < .001). According to the multivariate regression, days to removal of lines with CLISA score of 2 or 3 was 3.19 days faster after the intervention (P < .001). Also, line dwell time decreased 37.1% from a mean of 14 days (standard deviation [SD], 10.6) to 8.8 days (SD, 9.0) (P < .001). Device utilization ratios decreased 9% from 0.64 (SD, 0.08) to 0.58 (SD, 0.06) (P = .039).

The CLISA score creates a common language for assessing line infection risk and successfully promotes high compliance with best practices in timely line removal.