We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Deepak Cyril D'Souza, Staff Psychiatrist, VA Connecticut Healthcare System; Professor of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine,David Castle, University of Tasmania, Australia,Sir Robin Murray, Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, Psychosis Service at the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust; Professor of Psychiatric Research at the Institute of Psychiatry
People with psychosis and those at clinical high risk (CHR) for this syndrome have significantly higher prevalence of cannabis use compared to the general population. Furthermore, cannabis use can negatively impact the course and treatment outcomes in psychosis. Understanding the acute subjective and cognitive effects of cannabis and cannabinoids in this population is necessary if we are to disentangle the reasons for the increased prevalence of use; and also to help design interventions. There is little evidence to support the ’self-medication’ hypothesis, in its original form. Among principal phyto-cannabinoids, while THC exacerbates positive and cognitive symptoms of psychosis, cannabidiol lacks these effects and may even improve these symptoms. With the liberalization of cannabis laws in many countries, cannabis and cannabis-based products will be more accessible to both individuals with psychotic disorders and those at risk for psychosis. This chapter summarizes the literature regarding acute effects of cannabis and cannabinoids in people at CHR and with established psychosis.
Edited by
Deepak Cyril D'Souza, Staff Psychiatrist, VA Connecticut Healthcare System; Professor of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine,David Castle, University of Tasmania, Australia,Sir Robin Murray, Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, Psychosis Service at the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust; Professor of Psychiatric Research at the Institute of Psychiatry
Converging lines of pre-clinical, epidemiological, and experimental evidence support an association between cannabis, cannabinoid agonists, and psychosis (see Chapters 14 and 15). The earliest anecdotal reports on observations between the use of cannabis and subsequent psychosis have been validated by a rich literature of longitudinal studies and more recently experimental studies in humans using a wide array of subjective, cognitive, and electrophysiological outcomes relevant to psychosis. This chapter provides an overview of the subjective psychotic phenomena associated with cannabis and cannabinoids and expands on more objective cognitive and psychophysiological cannabis-related effects pertinent to psychosis.
To conduct a meta-analysis of the effect of ketamine on psychopathology in healthy volunteers and patients with schizophrenia, and the experimental factors affecting this.
Background
Ketamine is increasingly used to treat depression and other psychiatric disorders but can induce schizophrenia-like symptoms. Despite this, the consistency and magnitude of symptoms induced by ketamine, or what factors influence the effects of ketamine on these remain unknown.
Method
MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsychINFO databases were searched for within-subject placebo controlled studies reporting symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) or Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in response to an acute ketamine challenge in healthy participants or people with schizophrenia. Two independent investigators extracted study-level data for a random-effects meta-analysis. Total, positive and negative BPRS and PANSS scores were extracted. Sub-group analyses were conducted examining the effect of: blinding status, ketamine preparation, infusion method and time between ketamine and placebo condition. Standardized mean change scores were used as effect sizes for individual studies. Standardized mean changes between ketamine and placebo for total, positive and negative BPRS and PANSS were calculated.
Result
Of 7819 citations retrieved, 36 studies involving healthy participants were included. The overall sample included 725 healthy volunteers exposed to both the ketamine and placebo condition. Ketamine induced a significant increase in transient psychopathology in healthy participants, for total (Standardized mean change (SMC) = 1.50 (95% CI = 1.23 to 1.77), p < 0.0001), positive (SMC = 1.55 (95% CI = 1.29 to 1.81), p < 0.0001) and negative (SMC = 1.16, (95% CI = 0.96 to 1.35), p < 0.0001) symptom ratings, relative to the placebo condition. This effect was significantly greater for positive symptoms than negative symptoms (p = 0.004). Bolus followed by constant infusion increased ketamine's effect on positive symptoms relative to infusion alone (p = 0.006). Single-day study design increased ketamine's effect on total symptoms (p = 0.007), but age and gender did not moderate effects. There were insufficient studies for meta-analysis of studies in schizophrenia. Of these studies, two found a significant increase in symptoms with ketamine administration in total and positive symptoms. Only one study found an increase in negative symptom severity with ketamine.
Conclusion
These findings show that acute ketamine administration induces schizophrenia-like symptomatology with large effect sizes but there is a greater increase in positive than negative symptoms, and when a bolus is used. These findings suggest bolus doses should be avoided in its therapeutic use to minimize the risk of inducing transient positive psychotic symptoms.
To explore whether cannabis has a potential role in actually causing bipolar disorder, a general population cohort study design is informative. Cahill et al. reviewed the interactions between chronic cannabis use and cognitive compromise in bipolar disorder. In trying to understand the interaction between the cannabis and bipolar disorder, attention has been given to the endocannabinoid system. Ashton et al. have detailed the mechanisms of the endocannabinoid system that have been implicated in brain reward pathways, pain, sleep, mood and anxiety. The authors have acknowledged the difficulties with studying the cannabinoids, including issues with doses, mode of administration and tolerance. There is no doubt a great deal of comorbidity between bipolar disorder and cannabis use. There is also a growing body of evidence regarding the deleterious effects of cannabis use in patients with bipolar disorder.