The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the continuity of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) worldwide. However, the use of teleneuropsychology (TNP) to provide CR has contributed significantly to the continuity of treatment. The objective of this study was to measure the effects of CR via the TNP on cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and memory strategies in a cohort of patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

A sample of 60 patients (60% female; age: 72.4±6.96) with MCI according to Petersen criteria was randomly divided into two groups: 30 cases (treatment group) and 30 controls (waiting list group). Subjects were matched for age, sex, and MMSE or MoCA.

The treatment group received ten weekly CR sessions of 45 minutes weekly. Pre-treatment (week 0) and post-treatment (week 10) measures were assessed for both groups. Different Linear Mixed Models were estimated to test treatment effect (CR vs. Controls) on each outcome of interest over Time (Pre/Post), controlling for Diagnosis, Age, Sex, and MMSE/MoCA performance.

A significant Group (Control/Treatment) x Time (pre/post) interaction revealed that the treatment group at 10 weeks had better scores in cognitive variables: memory (RAVLT learning trials p=0.030; RAVLT delayed recall p=0.029), phonological fluency(p=0.001), activities of daily living (FAQ p=0.001), satisfaction with memory performance (MMQ Satisfaction p=0.004) and use of memory strategies (MMQ Strategy p=0.00), and a significant reduction of affective symptomatology: depression (GDS p=0.00), neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPIQ p=0.045), Forgetfulness (EDO-10 p=0.00), Stress (DAS Stress p=0.00).

This is the first study to test CR using teleNP in South America. Our results suggest that CR through teleNP is an effective intervention to improve performance on cognitive variables and reduce neuropsychiatric symptomatology compared to patients with MCI. These results have great significance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in South America, where teleNP is proving to be a valuable tool.

The objective of this study is to explore the impact on the mental health of caregivers of people with dementia during the period of mandatory preventive social isolation (ASPO) and to study which of these factors were predictors of caregiver overload.

During the first 3 months of the ASPO (June 2020 to september 2020). A sample of 112 caregivers (75.89% female; age 58.65 ± 14. 30) of patients with dementia from a Memory Center answered, remotely (online or telephone) a survey with the following questionnaires: the Zarit Caregiver Overload Scale (ZBI), Weekly hourly load dedicated to the care of patients with dementia), the use of time in unpaid activities through an activity diary, provided by Argentine National Institute of Statistics and Census (INDEC), the Caregiver Activities Survey (CAS) and the Anxiety, Depression and Stress Scale (DASS-21). These questionnaires evaluate the conditions and characteristics of caregiving tasks and their impact on the caregiver in the context of ASPO. Additionally, it was recorded whether the person with dementia, the caregiver, or persons living with them had had COVID-19.

Descriptively, a disparity in frequency was observed in the gender of caregivers of persons with dementia, i.e., caregiving is inequitably distributed between men (24.11%) and women (75.89%). This difference hinders direct comparison between men and women. A regularized L2 regression was performed for the identification of predictors of caregiver overload identifying the number of caregiving hours (β=0.090), DAS depression (β=0.085), DASS anxiety (β=0.099) DASS stress (β=0.164), fear of Covid (0.141) and lower patient cognitive performance according to MMSE (β=-0.41) and to lesser extent sex as the greatest contributors to patient overload. Additionally, a mediation analysis was performed in which the factors number of caregiving hours (CAS; r= 0.254,r= 0.292,r= 0.252,r= 0.252,r= -0.37), being a primary caregiver and fear of Covid-19 (r= 0.335,r= 0.432,r= 0.402,r= -0.496) were found to be mediators of the effect between anxiety, depression, stress (DASS) and overload (ZBI).

Caregivers of patients with dementia have suffered sequelae such as anxiety, stress, depression, and overload (caregivers’ burden) in the context of the COVID-19 virus spread and during mandatory preventive social isolation. Being a primary caregiver, dedicating more hours to caregiving, and fear of Covid-19 are factors that contribute significantly to caregiver burden and mediate between this burden and mood variables. Public policies to support caregivers and information about the disease could modify these variables and reduce caregiver burden.

Craft Story 21 is a practical, comprehensive, and freely available tool to assess logical memory in patients with memory impairment. Currently, the test does not have normative values in Spanish that adjust to our specific population. Furthermore, the original test does not have a recognition phase to increase the specificity of the memory profile by allowing a distinction between different amnesic profiles. Therefore, this study has two main aims: 1) the generation of normative data for the Craft Story 21 memory test, adjusting to the characteristics of our Spanish-speaking country according to sex, age, and educational level; and 2) the design and validation of the recognition phase of the test and the assessment of its psychometric properties.

The baremization sample comprised 81 healthy participants aged 41 to 91, assessed through the Uniform Data Set III (UDS III) battery of the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC). The design of the recognition phase included three steps: (1) construction of the scale and review by experts, (2) pilot study, and (3) analysis of its psychometric properties. In the latter, 190 participants were recruited and classified into two groups matched by age, sex, and educational level: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI n=96) according to Petersen’s (1999) criteria and healthy controls (HC n=94). In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of the test was studied by the ROC curve method, its concurrent validity by correlation with other memory tests (RAVLT), and its internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha test.

The Baremization sample was divided into 16 groups: 4 age groups (41-51, 51-61, 6171 and >72 years), two educational levels (6-12 years and >12 years), and sex (male and female). Performance was significantly different between age groups (p < 0.003**). No significant differences were found in Craft Story 21 performance between education (p > 0.09) or sex (p > 0.56) groups within the same age group. Normative values in terms of means and standard deviations are presented for each group. Regarding the design of the recognition phase, the groups did not show significant differences in age (p= 0.13), sex (p= 0.88), or schooling (p= 0.33). The overall score of Craft Story 21 test showed the ability to discriminate between healthy controls from patients with MCI (sensitivity = 81.6% and specificity = 72.4%). Its diagnostic accuracy by phase (immediate AUC= 0.86; delayed AUC= 0.86 and recognition AUC= 0.75) was superior than Rey Auditory and Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT): immediate (AUC= 0.79), delayed (AUC= 0.82) and recognition (AUC= 0.74). It presented evidence of concurrent validity with RAVLT in its immediate (r=0.56, p<0.001), delayed (r= 0.66, p<0.001) and recognition (r= 0.37, p<0.001) trails. The instrument also presented evidence of reliability (a= 0.82).

The Craft Story 21 test is a practical, brief and multicultural scale. Thus having appropriate scales for the specific population to be assessed to a more accurate and precise description of the memory profile. Additionally, the new Recognition phase of the test showed evidence of validity and reliability for assessing memory processes.

Previous research has suggested that there is a degree of variability among older adults’ response to memory training, such that some individuals benefit more than others. The aim of the present study was to identify the profile of older adults who were likely to benefit most from a strategic memory training program that has previously proved to be effective in improving memory in healthy older adults.

In total, 44 older adults (60–83 years) participated in a strategic memory training. We examined memory training benefits by measuring changes in memory practiced (word list learning) and non-practiced tasks (grocery list and associative learning). In addition, a battery of cognitive measures was administered in order to assess crystallized and fluid abilities, short-term memory, working memory, and processing speed.

Results confirmed the efficacy of the training in improving performance in both practiced and non-practiced memory tasks. For the practiced memory tasks, results showed that memory baseline performance and crystallized ability predicted training gains. For the non-practiced memory tasks, analyses showed that memory baseline performance was a significant predictor of gain in the grocery list learning task. For the associative learning task, the significant predictors were memory baseline performance, processing speed, and marginally the age.

Our results indicate that older adults with a higher baseline memory capacity and with more efficient cognitive resources were those who tended to benefit most from the training. The present study provides new avenues in designing personalized intervention according to the older adults’ cognitive profile.